Both functions do the same thing after proper locking, but with
different sigpending structs, so move the common code into a helper.
After this we have 4 places that look very similar: send_sigqueue: calls
do_send_sigqueue and signal_wakeup send_group_sigqueue: calls
do_send_sigqueue and __group_complete_signal __group_send_sig_info:
calls send_signal and __group_complete_signal specific_send_sig_info:
calls send_signal and signal_wakeup
Besides, send_signal performs actions similar to do_send_sigqueue's
and __group_complete_signal - to signal_wakeup.
It looks like they can be consolidated gracefully.
Oleg said:
Personally, I think this change is very good. But send_sigqueue() and
send_group_sigqueue() have a very subtle difference which I was never able
to understand.
Let's suppose that sigqueue is already queued, and the signal is ignored
(the latter means we should re-schedule cpu timer or handle overrruns). In
that case send_sigqueue() returns 0, but send_group_sigqueue() returns 1.
I think this is not the problem (in fact, I think this patch makes the
behaviour more correct), but I hope Thomas can take a look and confirm.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
9e3bd6c3fb