Ronny reported that the following scenario is not handled correctly: T1 (prio = 10) lock(rtmutex); T2 (prio = 20) lock(rtmutex) boost T1 T1 (prio = 20) sys_set_scheduler(prio = 30) T1 prio = 30 .... sys_set_scheduler(prio = 10) T1 prio = 30 The last step is wrong as T1 should now be back at prio 20. Commit |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Makefile | ||
lglock.c | ||
lockdep.c | ||
lockdep_internals.h | ||
lockdep_proc.c | ||
lockdep_states.h | ||
locktorture.c | ||
mcs_spinlock.h | ||
mutex-debug.c | ||
mutex-debug.h | ||
mutex.c | ||
mutex.h | ||
osq_lock.c | ||
percpu-rwsem.c | ||
qrwlock.c | ||
rtmutex-debug.c | ||
rtmutex-debug.h | ||
rtmutex-tester.c | ||
rtmutex.c | ||
rtmutex.h | ||
rtmutex_common.h | ||
rwsem-spinlock.c | ||
rwsem-xadd.c | ||
rwsem.c | ||
rwsem.h | ||
semaphore.c | ||
spinlock.c | ||
spinlock_debug.c |