If process_open1() creates a new open owner, but the open later fails,
the current code will leave the open owner around. It won't be on the
close_lru list, and the client isn't expected to send a CLOSE, so it
will hang around as long as the client does.
Similarly, if process_open1() removes an existing open owner from the
close lru, anticipating that an open owner that previously had no
associated stateid's now will, but the open subsequently fails, then
we'll again be left with the same leak.
Fix both problems.
Reported-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
d29b20cd58