d838d2c09a
It seems drivers/firewire/ohci.c is making some optimistic assumptions about struct fw_ohci and that member "card" will always remain the first member of the struct. Plus it's probably going to confuse a lot of static code analyzers too. So I wonder if there is a good reason not to free the ohci struct just like it was allocated instead of the tricky &ohci->card way? Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> It is perhaps just a rudiment from before mainline submission of the driver. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
core-card.c | ||
core-cdev.c | ||
core-device.c | ||
core-iso.c | ||
core-topology.c | ||
core-transaction.c | ||
core.h | ||
init_ohci1394_dma.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile | ||
net.c | ||
nosy-user.h | ||
nosy.c | ||
nosy.h | ||
ohci.c | ||
ohci.h | ||
sbp2.c |