7e55b59b2f
NFSv4 clients can contact port 2049 directly instead of needing the portmapper. Therefore a failure to register to the portmapper when starting an NFSv4-only server isn't really a problem. But Gareth Williams reports that an attempt to start an NFSv4-only server without starting portmap fails: #rpc.nfsd -N 2 -N 3 rpc.nfsd: writing fd to kernel failed: errno 111 (Connection refused) rpc.nfsd: unable to set any sockets for nfsd Add a flag to svc_version to tell the rpc layer it can safely ignore an rpcbind failure in the NFSv4-only case. Reported-by: Gareth Williams <gareth@garethwilliams.me.uk> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acpi | ||
| asm-generic | ||
| clocksource | ||
| crypto | ||
| drm | ||
| dt-bindings | ||
| keys | ||
| kvm | ||
| linux | ||
| math-emu | ||
| media | ||
| memory | ||
| misc | ||
| net | ||
| pcmcia | ||
| ras | ||
| rdma | ||
| rxrpc | ||
| scsi | ||
| sound | ||
| target | ||
| trace | ||
| uapi | ||
| video | ||
| xen | ||
| Kbuild | ||