qemu-e2k/hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c

259 lines
8.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* QEMU PC System Firmware
*
* Copyright (c) 2003-2004 Fabrice Bellard
* Copyright (c) 2011-2012 Intel Corporation
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
* in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
* to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
* copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
* THE SOFTWARE.
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
#include "qemu-common.h"
2016-03-14 09:01:28 +01:00
#include "qapi/error.h"
#include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "qemu/option.h"
#include "qemu/units.h"
#include "hw/sysbus.h"
#include "hw/i386/x86.h"
#include "hw/i386/pc.h"
#include "hw/loader.h"
#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
#include "hw/block/flash.h"
#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
/*
* We don't have a theoretically justifiable exact lower bound on the base
* address of any flash mapping. In practice, the IO-APIC MMIO range is
* [0xFEE00000..0xFEE01000] -- see IO_APIC_DEFAULT_ADDRESS --, leaving free
* only 18MB-4KB below 4G. For now, restrict the cumulative mapping to 8MB in
* size.
*/
#define FLASH_SIZE_LIMIT (8 * MiB)
#define FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE 4096
static void pc_isa_bios_init(MemoryRegion *rom_memory,
MemoryRegion *flash_mem,
int ram_size)
{
int isa_bios_size;
MemoryRegion *isa_bios;
uint64_t flash_size;
void *flash_ptr, *isa_bios_ptr;
flash_size = memory_region_size(flash_mem);
/* map the last 128KB of the BIOS in ISA space */
isa_bios_size = MIN(flash_size, 128 * KiB);
isa_bios = g_malloc(sizeof(*isa_bios));
memory_region_init_ram(isa_bios, NULL, "isa-bios", isa_bios_size,
Fix bad error handling after memory_region_init_ram() Symptom: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 10000000 Unexpected error in ram_block_add() at /work/armbru/qemu/exec.c:1456: upstream-qemu: cannot set up guest memory 'pc.ram': Cannot allocate memory Aborted (core dumped) Root cause: commit ef701d7 screwed up handling of out-of-memory conditions. Before the commit, we report the error and exit(1), in one place, ram_block_add(). The commit lifts the error handling up the call chain some, to three places. Fine. Except it uses &error_abort in these places, changing the behavior from exit(1) to abort(), and thus undoing the work of commit 3922825 "exec: Don't abort when we can't allocate guest memory". The three places are: * memory_region_init_ram() Commit 4994653 (right after commit ef701d7) lifted the error handling further, through memory_region_init_ram(), multiplying the incorrect use of &error_abort. Later on, imitation of existing (bad) code may have created more. * memory_region_init_ram_ptr() The &error_abort is still there. * memory_region_init_rom_device() Doesn't need fixing, because commit 33e0eb5 (soon after commit ef701d7) lifted the error handling further, and in the process changed it from &error_abort to passing it up the call chain. Correct, because the callers are realize() methods. Fix the error handling after memory_region_init_ram() with a Coccinelle semantic patch: @r@ expression mr, owner, name, size, err; position p; @@ memory_region_init_ram(mr, owner, name, size, ( - &error_abort + &error_fatal | err@p ) ); @script:python@ p << r.p; @@ print "%s:%s:%s" % (p[0].file, p[0].line, p[0].column) When the last argument is &error_abort, it gets replaced by &error_fatal. This is the fix. If the last argument is anything else, its position is reported. This lets us check the fix is complete. Four positions get reported: * ram_backend_memory_alloc() Error is passed up the call chain, ultimately through user_creatable_complete(). As far as I can tell, it's callers all handle the error sanely. * fsl_imx25_realize(), fsl_imx31_realize(), dp8393x_realize() DeviceClass.realize() methods, errors handled sanely further up the call chain. We're good. Test case again behaves: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 10000000 qemu-system-x86_64: cannot set up guest memory 'pc.ram': Cannot allocate memory [Exit 1 ] The next commits will repair the rest of commit ef701d7's damage. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1441983105-26376-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
2015-09-11 16:51:43 +02:00
&error_fatal);
memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(rom_memory,
0x100000 - isa_bios_size,
isa_bios,
1);
/* copy ISA rom image from top of flash memory */
flash_ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(flash_mem);
isa_bios_ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(isa_bios);
memcpy(isa_bios_ptr,
((uint8_t*)flash_ptr) + (flash_size - isa_bios_size),
isa_bios_size);
memory_region_set_readonly(isa_bios, true);
}
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
static PFlashCFI01 *pc_pflash_create(PCMachineState *pcms,
const char *name,
const char *alias_prop_name)
{
DeviceState *dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_PFLASH_CFI01);
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
qdev_prop_set_uint64(dev, "sector-length", FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE);
qdev_prop_set_uint8(dev, "width", 1);
qdev_prop_set_string(dev, "name", name);
object_property_add_child(OBJECT(pcms), name, OBJECT(dev),
&error_abort);
object_property_add_alias(OBJECT(pcms), alias_prop_name,
OBJECT(dev), "drive", &error_abort);
return PFLASH_CFI01(dev);
}
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
void pc_system_flash_create(PCMachineState *pcms)
{
PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
if (pcmc->pci_enabled) {
pcms->flash[0] = pc_pflash_create(pcms, "system.flash0",
"pflash0");
pcms->flash[1] = pc_pflash_create(pcms, "system.flash1",
"pflash1");
}
}
static void pc_system_flash_cleanup_unused(PCMachineState *pcms)
{
char *prop_name;
int i;
Object *dev_obj;
assert(PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms)->pci_enabled);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pcms->flash); i++) {
dev_obj = OBJECT(pcms->flash[i]);
if (!object_property_get_bool(dev_obj, "realized", &error_abort)) {
prop_name = g_strdup_printf("pflash%d", i);
object_property_del(OBJECT(pcms), prop_name, &error_abort);
g_free(prop_name);
object_unparent(dev_obj);
pcms->flash[i] = NULL;
}
}
}
/*
* Map the pcms->flash[] from 4GiB downward, and realize.
* Map them in descending order, i.e. pcms->flash[0] at the top,
* without gaps.
* Stop at the first pcms->flash[0] lacking a block backend.
* Set each flash's size from its block backend. Fatal error if the
* size isn't a non-zero multiple of 4KiB, or the total size exceeds
* FLASH_SIZE_LIMIT.
*
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
* If pcms->flash[0] has a block backend, its memory is passed to
* pc_isa_bios_init(). Merging several flash devices for isa-bios is
* not supported.
*/
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,
MemoryRegion *rom_memory)
{
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
hwaddr total_size = 0;
int i;
BlockBackend *blk;
int64_t size;
PFlashCFI01 *system_flash;
MemoryRegion *flash_mem;
void *flash_ptr;
int ret, flash_size;
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
assert(PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms)->pci_enabled);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pcms->flash); i++) {
system_flash = pcms->flash[i];
blk = pflash_cfi01_get_blk(system_flash);
if (!blk) {
break;
}
size = blk_getlength(blk);
if (size < 0) {
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
error_report("can't get size of block device %s: %s",
blk_name(blk), strerror(-size));
exit(1);
}
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
if (size == 0 || size % FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE != 0) {
error_report("system firmware block device %s has invalid size "
"%" PRId64,
blk_name(blk), size);
info_report("its size must be a non-zero multiple of 0x%x",
FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE);
exit(1);
}
if ((hwaddr)size != size
|| total_size > HWADDR_MAX - size
|| total_size + size > FLASH_SIZE_LIMIT) {
error_report("combined size of system firmware exceeds "
"%" PRIu64 " bytes",
FLASH_SIZE_LIMIT);
exit(1);
}
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
total_size += size;
qdev_prop_set_uint32(DEVICE(system_flash), "num-blocks",
size / FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE);
qdev_init_nofail(DEVICE(system_flash));
sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(system_flash), 0,
0x100000000ULL - total_size);
if (i == 0) {
flash_mem = pflash_cfi01_get_memory(system_flash);
pc_isa_bios_init(rom_memory, flash_mem, size);
/* Encrypt the pflash boot ROM */
if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled()) {
flash_ptr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(flash_mem);
flash_size = memory_region_size(flash_mem);
ret = kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(flash_ptr, flash_size);
if (ret) {
error_report("failed to encrypt pflash rom");
exit(1);
}
}
}
}
}
void pc_system_firmware_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
MemoryRegion *rom_memory)
{
PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
int i;
BlockBackend *pflash_blk[ARRAY_SIZE(pcms->flash)];
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
if (!pcmc->pci_enabled) {
x86_bios_rom_init(rom_memory, true);
return;
}
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
/* Map legacy -drive if=pflash to machine properties */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pcms->flash); i++) {
pflash_cfi01_legacy_drive(pcms->flash[i],
drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, i));
pflash_blk[i] = pflash_cfi01_get_blk(pcms->flash[i]);
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
}
/* Reject gaps */
for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pcms->flash); i++) {
if (pflash_blk[i] && !pflash_blk[i - 1]) {
error_report("pflash%d requires pflash%d", i, i - 1);
exit(1);
}
}
if (!pflash_blk[0]) {
/* Machine property pflash0 not set, use ROM mode */
x86_bios_rom_init(rom_memory, false);
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
} else {
if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_readonly_mem_enabled()) {
/*
* Older KVM cannot execute from device memory. So, flash
* memory cannot be used unless the readonly memory kvm
* capability is present.
*/
error_report("pflash with kvm requires KVM readonly memory support");
exit(1);
}
pc_system_flash_map(pcms, rom_memory);
}
pc: Support firmware configuration with -blockdev The PC machines put firmware in ROM by default. To get it put into flash memory (required by OVMF), you have to use -drive if=pflash,unit=0,... and optionally -drive if=pflash,unit=1,... Why two -drive? This permits setting up one part of the flash memory read-only, and the other part read/write. It also makes upgrading firmware on the host easier. Below the hood, it creates two separate flash devices, because we were too lazy to improve our flash device models to support sector protection. The problem at hand is to do the same with -blockdev somehow, as one more step towards deprecating -drive. Mapping -drive if=none,... to -blockdev is a solved problem. With if=T other than if=none, -drive additionally configures a block device frontend. For non-onboard devices, that part maps to -device. Also a solved problem. For onboard devices such as PC flash memory, we have an unsolved problem. This is actually an instance of a wider problem: our general device configuration interface doesn't cover onboard devices. Instead, we have a zoo of ad hoc interfaces that are much more limited. One of them is -drive, which we'd rather deprecate, but can't until we have suitable replacements for all its uses. Sadly, I can't attack the wider problem today. So back to the narrow problem. My first idea was to reduce it to its solved buddy by using pluggable instead of onboard devices for the flash memory. Workable, but it requires some extra smarts in firmware descriptors and libvirt. Paolo had an idea that is simpler for libvirt: keep the devices onboard, and add machine properties for their block backends. The implementation is less than straightforward, I'm afraid. First, block backend properties are *qdev* properties. Machines can't have those, as they're not devices. I could duplicate these qdev properties as QOM properties, but I hate that. More seriously, the properties do not belong to the machine, they belong to the onboard flash devices. Adding them to the machine would then require bad magic to somehow transfer them to the flash devices. Fortunately, QOM provides the means to handle exactly this case: add alias properties to the machine that forward to the onboard devices' properties. Properties need to be created in .instance_init() methods. For PC machines, that's pc_machine_initfn(). To make alias properties work, we need to create the onboard flash devices there, too. Requires several bug fixes, in the previous commits. We also have to realize the devices. More on that below. If the user sets pflash0, firmware resides in flash memory. pc_system_firmware_init() maps and realizes the flash devices. Else, firmware resides in ROM. The onboard flash devices aren't used then. pc_system_firmware_init() destroys them unrealized, along with the alias properties. The existing code to pick up drives defined with -drive if=pflash is replaced by code to desugar into the machine properties. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Message-Id: <87ftrtux81.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
2019-03-11 18:39:26 +01:00
pc_system_flash_cleanup_unused(pcms);
}