qemu-e2k/include/qapi/visitor-impl.h

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

138 lines
4.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Core Definitions for QAPI Visitor implementations
*
* Copyright (C) 2012-2016 Red Hat, Inc.
*
* Author: Paolo Bonizni <pbonzini@redhat.com>
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.1 or later.
* See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory.
*
*/
#ifndef QAPI_VISITOR_IMPL_H
#define QAPI_VISITOR_IMPL_H
#include "qapi/visitor.h"
/*
* This file describes the callback interface for implementing a QAPI
* visitor. For the client interface, see visitor.h. When
* implementing the callbacks, it is easiest to declare a struct with
* 'Visitor visitor;' as the first member. A callback's contract
* matches the corresponding public functions' contract unless stated
* otherwise. In the comments below, some callbacks are marked "must
* be set for $TYPE visits to work"; if a visitor implementation omits
* that callback, it should also document that it is only useful for a
* subset of QAPI.
*/
/*
qapi: Add new clone visitor We have a couple places in the code base that want to deep-clone one QAPI object into another, and they were resorting to serializing the struct out to QObject then reparsing it. A much more efficient version can be done by adding a new clone visitor. Since cloning is still relatively uncommon, expose the use of the new visitor via a QAPI_CLONE() macro that takes care of type-punning the underlying function pointer, rather than generating lots of unused functions for types that won't be cloned. And yes, we're relying on the compiler treating all pointers equally, even though a strict C program cannot portably do so - but we're not the first one in the qemu code base to expect it to work (hello, glib!). The choice of adding a fourth visitor type deserves some explanation. On the surface, the clone visitor is mostly an input visitor (it takes arbitrary input - in this case, another QAPI object - and creates a new QAPI object during the course of the visit). But ever since commit da72ab0 consolidated enum visits based on the visitor type, using VISITOR_INPUT would cause us to run visit_type_str(), even though for cloning there is nothing to do (we just copy the enum value across, without regards to its mapping to strings). Also, since our input happens to be a QAPI object, we can also satisfy the internal checks for VISITOR_OUTPUT. So in the end, I settled with a new VISITOR_CLONE, and chose its value such that many internal checks can use 'v->type & mask', sticking to 'v->type == value' where the difference matters. Note that we can only clone objects (including alternates) and lists, not built-ins or enums. The visitor core hides integer width from the actual visitor (since commit 04e070d), and as long as that's the case, we can't clone top-level integers. Then again, those can always be cloned by direct copy, since they are not objects with deep pointers, so it's no real loss. And restricting cloning to just objects and lists is cleaner than restricting it to non-integers. As such, I documented that the clone visitor is for direct use only by code internal to QAPI, and should not be used on incomplete objects (other than a hack to work around the fact that we allow NULL in place of "" in visit_type_str() in other output visitors). Note that as written, the clone visitor will never fail on a complete object. Scalars (including enums) not at the root of the clone copy just fine with no additional effort while visiting the scalar, by virtue of a g_memdup() each time we push another struct onto the stack. Cloning a string requires deduplication of a pointer, which means it can also provide the guarantee of an input visitor of never producing NULL even when still accepting NULL in place of "" the way the QMP output visitor does. Cloning an 'any' type could be possible by incrementing the QObject refcnt, but it's not obvious whether that is better than implementing a QObject deep clone. So for now, we document it as unsupported, and intentionally omit the .type_any() callback to let a developer know their usage needs implementation. Add testsuite coverage for several different clone situations, to ensure that the code is working. I also tested that valgrind was happy with the test. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-06-09 18:48:44 +02:00
* There are four classes of visitors; setting the class determines
* how QAPI enums are visited, as well as what additional restrictions
qapi: Add new clone visitor We have a couple places in the code base that want to deep-clone one QAPI object into another, and they were resorting to serializing the struct out to QObject then reparsing it. A much more efficient version can be done by adding a new clone visitor. Since cloning is still relatively uncommon, expose the use of the new visitor via a QAPI_CLONE() macro that takes care of type-punning the underlying function pointer, rather than generating lots of unused functions for types that won't be cloned. And yes, we're relying on the compiler treating all pointers equally, even though a strict C program cannot portably do so - but we're not the first one in the qemu code base to expect it to work (hello, glib!). The choice of adding a fourth visitor type deserves some explanation. On the surface, the clone visitor is mostly an input visitor (it takes arbitrary input - in this case, another QAPI object - and creates a new QAPI object during the course of the visit). But ever since commit da72ab0 consolidated enum visits based on the visitor type, using VISITOR_INPUT would cause us to run visit_type_str(), even though for cloning there is nothing to do (we just copy the enum value across, without regards to its mapping to strings). Also, since our input happens to be a QAPI object, we can also satisfy the internal checks for VISITOR_OUTPUT. So in the end, I settled with a new VISITOR_CLONE, and chose its value such that many internal checks can use 'v->type & mask', sticking to 'v->type == value' where the difference matters. Note that we can only clone objects (including alternates) and lists, not built-ins or enums. The visitor core hides integer width from the actual visitor (since commit 04e070d), and as long as that's the case, we can't clone top-level integers. Then again, those can always be cloned by direct copy, since they are not objects with deep pointers, so it's no real loss. And restricting cloning to just objects and lists is cleaner than restricting it to non-integers. As such, I documented that the clone visitor is for direct use only by code internal to QAPI, and should not be used on incomplete objects (other than a hack to work around the fact that we allow NULL in place of "" in visit_type_str() in other output visitors). Note that as written, the clone visitor will never fail on a complete object. Scalars (including enums) not at the root of the clone copy just fine with no additional effort while visiting the scalar, by virtue of a g_memdup() each time we push another struct onto the stack. Cloning a string requires deduplication of a pointer, which means it can also provide the guarantee of an input visitor of never producing NULL even when still accepting NULL in place of "" the way the QMP output visitor does. Cloning an 'any' type could be possible by incrementing the QObject refcnt, but it's not obvious whether that is better than implementing a QObject deep clone. So for now, we document it as unsupported, and intentionally omit the .type_any() callback to let a developer know their usage needs implementation. Add testsuite coverage for several different clone situations, to ensure that the code is working. I also tested that valgrind was happy with the test. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-06-09 18:48:44 +02:00
* can be asserted. The values are intentionally chosen so as to
* permit some assertions based on whether a given bit is set (that
* is, some assertions apply to input and clone visitors, some
* assertions apply to output and clone visitors).
*/
typedef enum VisitorType {
qapi: Add new clone visitor We have a couple places in the code base that want to deep-clone one QAPI object into another, and they were resorting to serializing the struct out to QObject then reparsing it. A much more efficient version can be done by adding a new clone visitor. Since cloning is still relatively uncommon, expose the use of the new visitor via a QAPI_CLONE() macro that takes care of type-punning the underlying function pointer, rather than generating lots of unused functions for types that won't be cloned. And yes, we're relying on the compiler treating all pointers equally, even though a strict C program cannot portably do so - but we're not the first one in the qemu code base to expect it to work (hello, glib!). The choice of adding a fourth visitor type deserves some explanation. On the surface, the clone visitor is mostly an input visitor (it takes arbitrary input - in this case, another QAPI object - and creates a new QAPI object during the course of the visit). But ever since commit da72ab0 consolidated enum visits based on the visitor type, using VISITOR_INPUT would cause us to run visit_type_str(), even though for cloning there is nothing to do (we just copy the enum value across, without regards to its mapping to strings). Also, since our input happens to be a QAPI object, we can also satisfy the internal checks for VISITOR_OUTPUT. So in the end, I settled with a new VISITOR_CLONE, and chose its value such that many internal checks can use 'v->type & mask', sticking to 'v->type == value' where the difference matters. Note that we can only clone objects (including alternates) and lists, not built-ins or enums. The visitor core hides integer width from the actual visitor (since commit 04e070d), and as long as that's the case, we can't clone top-level integers. Then again, those can always be cloned by direct copy, since they are not objects with deep pointers, so it's no real loss. And restricting cloning to just objects and lists is cleaner than restricting it to non-integers. As such, I documented that the clone visitor is for direct use only by code internal to QAPI, and should not be used on incomplete objects (other than a hack to work around the fact that we allow NULL in place of "" in visit_type_str() in other output visitors). Note that as written, the clone visitor will never fail on a complete object. Scalars (including enums) not at the root of the clone copy just fine with no additional effort while visiting the scalar, by virtue of a g_memdup() each time we push another struct onto the stack. Cloning a string requires deduplication of a pointer, which means it can also provide the guarantee of an input visitor of never producing NULL even when still accepting NULL in place of "" the way the QMP output visitor does. Cloning an 'any' type could be possible by incrementing the QObject refcnt, but it's not obvious whether that is better than implementing a QObject deep clone. So for now, we document it as unsupported, and intentionally omit the .type_any() callback to let a developer know their usage needs implementation. Add testsuite coverage for several different clone situations, to ensure that the code is working. I also tested that valgrind was happy with the test. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-06-09 18:48:44 +02:00
VISITOR_INPUT = 1,
VISITOR_OUTPUT = 2,
VISITOR_CLONE = 3,
VISITOR_DEALLOC = 4,
} VisitorType;
struct Visitor
{
/*
* Only input visitors may fail!
*/
/* Must be set to visit structs */
bool (*start_struct)(Visitor *v, const char *name, void **obj,
size_t size, Error **errp);
qapi: Split visit_end_struct() into pieces As mentioned in previous patches, we want to call visit_end_struct() functions unconditionally, so that visitors can release resources tied up since the matching visit_start_struct() without also having to worry about error priority if more than one error occurs. Even though error_propagate() can be safely used to ignore a second error during cleanup caused by a first error, it is simpler if the cleanup cannot set an error. So, split out the error checking portion (basically, input visitors checking for unvisited keys) into a new function visit_check_struct(), which can be safely skipped if any earlier errors are encountered, and leave the cleanup portion (which never fails, but must be called unconditionally if visit_start_struct() succeeded) in visit_end_struct(). Generated code in qapi-visit.c has diffs resembling: |@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@ void visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo(Visitor *v, | goto out_obj; | } | visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo_members(v, obj, &err); |- error_propagate(errp, err); |- err = NULL; |+ if (err) { |+ goto out_obj; |+ } |+ visit_check_struct(v, &err); | out_obj: |- visit_end_struct(v, &err); |+ visit_end_struct(v); | out: and in qapi-event.c: @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP | goto out; | } | visit_type_q_obj_ACPI_DEVICE_OST_arg_members(v, &param, &err); |- visit_end_struct(v, err ? NULL : &err); |+ if (!err) { |+ visit_check_struct(v, &err); |+ } |+ visit_end_struct(v); | if (err) { | goto out; Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Conflict with a doc fixup resolved] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-28 23:45:27 +02:00
/* Optional; intended for input visitors */
bool (*check_struct)(Visitor *v, Error **errp);
qapi: Split visit_end_struct() into pieces As mentioned in previous patches, we want to call visit_end_struct() functions unconditionally, so that visitors can release resources tied up since the matching visit_start_struct() without also having to worry about error priority if more than one error occurs. Even though error_propagate() can be safely used to ignore a second error during cleanup caused by a first error, it is simpler if the cleanup cannot set an error. So, split out the error checking portion (basically, input visitors checking for unvisited keys) into a new function visit_check_struct(), which can be safely skipped if any earlier errors are encountered, and leave the cleanup portion (which never fails, but must be called unconditionally if visit_start_struct() succeeded) in visit_end_struct(). Generated code in qapi-visit.c has diffs resembling: |@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@ void visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo(Visitor *v, | goto out_obj; | } | visit_type_ACPIOSTInfo_members(v, obj, &err); |- error_propagate(errp, err); |- err = NULL; |+ if (err) { |+ goto out_obj; |+ } |+ visit_check_struct(v, &err); | out_obj: |- visit_end_struct(v, &err); |+ visit_end_struct(v); | out: and in qapi-event.c: @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP | goto out; | } | visit_type_q_obj_ACPI_DEVICE_OST_arg_members(v, &param, &err); |- visit_end_struct(v, err ? NULL : &err); |+ if (!err) { |+ visit_check_struct(v, &err); |+ } |+ visit_end_struct(v); | if (err) { | goto out; Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-20-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Conflict with a doc fixup resolved] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-28 23:45:27 +02:00
/* Must be set to visit structs */
2016-06-09 18:48:34 +02:00
void (*end_struct)(Visitor *v, void **obj);
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-28 23:45:31 +02:00
/* Must be set; implementations may require @list to be non-null,
* but must document it. */
bool (*start_list)(Visitor *v, const char *name, GenericList **list,
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-28 23:45:31 +02:00
size_t size, Error **errp);
/* Must be set */
qapi: Simplify semantics of visit_next_list() The semantics of the list visit are somewhat baroque, with the following pseudocode when FooList is used: start() for (prev = head; cur = next(prev); prev = &cur) { visit(&cur->value) } Note that these semantics (advance before visit) requires that the first call to next() return the list head, while all other calls return the next element of the list; that is, every visitor implementation is required to track extra state to decide whether to return the input as-is, or to advance. It also requires an argument of 'GenericList **' to next(), solely because the first iteration might need to modify the caller's GenericList head, so that all other calls have to do a layer of dereferencing. Thankfully, we only have two uses of list visits in the entire code base: one in spapr_drc (which completely avoids visit_next_list(), feeding in integers from a different source than uint8List), and one in qapi-visit.py. That is, all other list visitors are generated in qapi-visit.c, and share the same paradigm based on a qapi FooList type, so we can refactor how lists are laid out with minimal churn among clients. We can greatly simplify things by hoisting the special case into the start() routine, and flipping the order in the loop to visit before advance: start(head) for (tail = *head; tail; tail = next(tail)) { visit(&tail->value) } With the simpler semantics, visitors have less state to track, the argument to next() is reduced to 'GenericList *', and it also becomes obvious whether an input visitor is allocating a FooList during visit_start_list() (rather than the old way of not knowing if an allocation happened until the first visit_next_list()). As a minor drawback, we now allocate in two functions instead of one, and have to pass the size to both functions (unless we were to tweak the input visitors to cache the size to start_list for reuse during next_list, but that defeats the goal of less visitor state). The signature of visit_start_list() is chosen to match visit_start_struct(), with the new parameters after 'name'. The spapr_drc case is a virtual visit, done by passing NULL for list, similarly to how NULL is passed to visit_start_struct() when a qapi type is not used in those visits. It was easy to provide these semantics for qmp-output and dealloc visitors, and a bit harder for qmp-input (several prerequisite patches refactored things to make this patch straightforward). But it turned out that the string and opts visitors munge enough other state during visit_next_list() to make it easier to just document and require a GenericList visit for now; an assertion will remind us to adjust things if we need the semantics in the future. Several pre-requisite cleanup patches made the reshuffling of the various visitors easier; particularly the qmp input visitor. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1461879932-9020-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-04-28 23:45:31 +02:00
GenericList *(*next_list)(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size);
/* Optional; intended for input visitors */
bool (*check_list)(Visitor *v, Error **errp);
/* Must be set */
2016-06-09 18:48:34 +02:00
void (*end_list)(Visitor *v, void **list);
/* Must be set by input and clone visitors to visit alternates */
bool (*start_alternate)(Visitor *v, const char *name,
GenericAlternate **obj, size_t size,
Error **errp);
/* Optional */
2016-06-09 18:48:34 +02:00
void (*end_alternate)(Visitor *v, void **obj);
/* Must be set */
bool (*type_int64)(Visitor *v, const char *name, int64_t *obj,
Error **errp);
/* Must be set */
bool (*type_uint64)(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint64_t *obj,
Error **errp);
/* Optional; fallback is type_uint64() */
bool (*type_size)(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint64_t *obj,
Error **errp);
/* Must be set */
bool (*type_bool)(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *obj, Error **errp);
/* Must be set */
bool (*type_str)(Visitor *v, const char *name, char **obj, Error **errp);
/* Must be set to visit numbers */
bool (*type_number)(Visitor *v, const char *name, double *obj,
Error **errp);
/* Must be set to visit arbitrary QTypes */
bool (*type_any)(Visitor *v, const char *name, QObject **obj,
Error **errp);
2016-04-28 23:45:22 +02:00
/* Must be set to visit explicit null values. */
bool (*type_null)(Visitor *v, const char *name, QNull **obj,
Error **errp);
2016-04-28 23:45:22 +02:00
/* Must be set for input visitors to visit structs, optional otherwise.
The core takes care of the return type in the public interface. */
void (*optional)(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *present);
/* Optional */
bool (*policy_reject)(Visitor *v, const char *name,
unsigned special_features, Error **errp);
/* Optional */
bool (*policy_skip)(Visitor *v, const char *name,
unsigned special_features);
/* Must be set */
VisitorType type;
/* Optional */
struct CompatPolicy compat_policy;
qapi: Add new visit_complete() function Making each output visitor provide its own output collection function was the only remaining reason for exposing visitor sub-types to the rest of the code base. Add a polymorphic visit_complete() function which is a no-op for input visitors, and which populates an opaque pointer for output visitors. For maximum type-safety, also add a parameter to the output visitor constructors with a type-correct version of the output pointer, and assert that the two uses match. This approach was considered superior to either passing the output parameter only during construction (action at a distance during visit_free() feels awkward) or only during visit_complete() (defeating type safety makes it easier to use incorrectly). Most callers were function-local, and therefore a mechanical conversion; the testsuite was a bit trickier, but the previous cleanup patch minimized the churn here. The visit_complete() function may be called at most once; doing so lets us use transfer semantics rather than duplication or ref-count semantics to get the just-built output back to the caller, even though it means our behavior is not idempotent. Generated code is simplified as follows for events: |@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP | QDict *qmp; | Error *err = NULL; | QMPEventFuncEmit emit; |- QmpOutputVisitor *qov; |+ QObject *obj; | Visitor *v; | q_obj_ACPI_DEVICE_OST_arg param = { | info |@@ -39,8 +39,7 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP | | qmp = qmp_event_build_dict("ACPI_DEVICE_OST"); | |- qov = qmp_output_visitor_new(); |- v = qmp_output_get_visitor(qov); |+ v = qmp_output_visitor_new(&obj); | | visit_start_struct(v, "ACPI_DEVICE_OST", NULL, 0, &err); | if (err) { |@@ -55,7 +54,8 @@ void qapi_event_send_acpi_device_ost(ACP | goto out; | } | |- qdict_put_obj(qmp, "data", qmp_output_get_qobject(qov)); |+ visit_complete(v, &obj); |+ qdict_put_obj(qmp, "data", obj); | emit(QAPI_EVENT_ACPI_DEVICE_OST, qmp, &err); and for commands: | { | Error *err = NULL; |- QmpOutputVisitor *qov = qmp_output_visitor_new(); | Visitor *v; | |- v = qmp_output_get_visitor(qov); |+ v = qmp_output_visitor_new(ret_out); | visit_type_AddfdInfo(v, "unused", &ret_in, &err); |- if (err) { |- goto out; |+ if (!err) { |+ visit_complete(v, ret_out); | } |- *ret_out = qmp_output_get_qobject(qov); |- |-out: | error_propagate(errp, err); Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-13-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-06-09 18:48:43 +02:00
/* Must be set for output visitors, optional otherwise. */
void (*complete)(Visitor *v, void *opaque);
/* Must be set */
void (*free)(Visitor *v);
};
#endif