qemu-e2k/tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json

355 lines
12 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

# *-*- Mode: Python -*-*
# vim: filetype=python
# This file is a stress test of supported qapi constructs that must
# parse and compile correctly.
# Whitelists to permit QAPI rule violations
{ 'pragma': {
# Types whose member names may use '_'
'member-name-exceptions': [
'UserDefA'
],
# Commands allowed to return a non-dictionary:
'command-returns-exceptions': [
'guest-get-time',
'guest-sync' ] } }
{ 'struct': 'TestStruct',
'data': { 'integer': {'type': 'int'}, 'boolean': 'bool', 'string': 'str' } }
# for testing enums
{ 'struct': 'NestedEnumsOne',
'data': { 'enum1': 'EnumOne', # Intentional forward reference
'*enum2': 'EnumOne', 'enum3': 'EnumOne', '*enum4': 'EnumOne' } }
# An empty enum, although unusual, is currently acceptable
{ 'enum': 'MyEnum', 'data': [ ] }
tests/qapi-schema: Test for reserved names, empty struct Add some testsuite coverage to ensure future patches are on the right track: Our current C representation of qapi arrays is done by appending 'List' to the element name; but we are not preventing the creation of an object type with the same name. Add reserved-type-list.json to test this. Then rename enum-union-clash.json to reserved-type-kind.json to cover the reservation that we DO detect, and shorten it to match the fact that the name is reserved even if there is no clash. We are failing to detect a collision between a dictionary member and the implicit 'has_*' flag for another optional member. The easiest fix would be for a future patch to reserve the entire "has[-_]" namespace for member names (the collision is also possible for branch names within flat unions, but only as long as branch names can collide with (non-variant) members; however, since future patches are about to remove that, it is not worth testing here). Add reserved-member-has.json to test this. A similar collision exists between a dictionary member where c_name() munges what might otherwise be a reserved name to start with 'q_', and another member explicitly starts with "q[-_]". Again, the easiest solution for a future patch will be reserving the entire namespace, but here for commands as well as members. Add reserved-member-q.json and reserved-command-q.json to test this; separate tests since arguably our munging of command 'unix' to 'qmp_q_unix()' could be done without a q_, which is different than the munging of a member 'unix' to 'foo.q_unix'. Finally, our testsuite does not have any compilation coverage of struct inheritance with empty qapi structs. Update qapi-schema-test.json to test this. Note that there is currently no technical reason to forbid type name patterns from member names, or member name patterns from types, since the two are not in the same namespace in C and won't collide; but it's not worth adding positive tests of these corner cases at this time, especially while there is other churn pending in patches that rearrange which collisions actually happen. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1445898903-12082-2-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message tweaked slightly] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-10-26 23:34:40 +01:00
# Likewise for an empty struct, including an empty base
{ 'struct': 'Empty1', 'data': { } }
{ 'struct': 'Empty2', 'base': 'Empty1', 'data': { } }
# Likewise for an empty union
{ 'union': 'Union',
'base': { 'type': 'EnumOne' }, 'discriminator': 'type',
'data': { } }
{ 'command': 'user-def-cmd0', 'data': 'Empty2', 'returns': 'Empty2' }
# for testing override of default naming heuristic
{ 'enum': 'QEnumTwo',
'prefix': 'QENUM_TWO',
'data': [ 'value1', 'value2' ] }
# for testing nested structs
{ 'struct': 'UserDefOne',
'base': 'UserDefZero', # intentional forward reference
'data': { 'string': 'str',
'*enum1': 'EnumOne' } } # intentional forward reference
{ 'enum': 'EnumOne',
'data': [ 'value1', 'value2', 'value3', 'value4' ] }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefZero',
'data': { 'integer': 'int' } }
qapi: Drop tests for inline nested structs A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument; but existing use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal. More precisely, a definition in the QAPI schema associates a name with a set of properties: Example 1: { 'struct': 'Foo', 'data': { MEMBERS... } } associates the global name 'Foo' with properties (meta-type struct) and MEMBERS... Example 2: 'mumble': TYPE within MEMBERS... above associates 'mumble' with properties (type TYPE) and (optional false) within type Foo The syntax of example 1 is extensible; if we need another property, we add another name/value pair to the dictionary (such as 'base':TYPE). The syntax of example 2 is not extensible, because the right hand side can only be a type. We have used name encoding to add a property: "'*mumble': 'int'" associates 'mumble' with (type int) and (optional true). Nice, but doesn't scale. So the solution is to change our existing uses to be syntactic sugar to an extensible form: NAME: TYPE --> NAME: { 'type': TYPE, 'optional': false } *ONAME: TYPE --> ONAME: { 'type': TYPE, 'optional': true } This patch fixes the testsuite to avoid inline nested types, by breaking the nesting into explicit types; it means that the type is now boxed instead of unboxed in C code, but makes no difference on the wire (and if desired, a later patch could change the generator to not do so much boxing in C). When touching code to add new allocations, also convert existing allocations to consistently prefer typesafe g_new0 over g_malloc0 when a type name is involved. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-05-04 17:05:30 +02:00
{ 'struct': 'UserDefTwoDictDict',
'data': { 'userdef': 'UserDefOne', 'string': 'str' } }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefTwoDict',
'data': { 'string1': 'str',
'dict2': 'UserDefTwoDictDict',
'*dict3': 'UserDefTwoDictDict' } }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefTwo',
'data': { 'string0': 'str',
qapi: Drop tests for inline nested structs A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument; but existing use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal. More precisely, a definition in the QAPI schema associates a name with a set of properties: Example 1: { 'struct': 'Foo', 'data': { MEMBERS... } } associates the global name 'Foo' with properties (meta-type struct) and MEMBERS... Example 2: 'mumble': TYPE within MEMBERS... above associates 'mumble' with properties (type TYPE) and (optional false) within type Foo The syntax of example 1 is extensible; if we need another property, we add another name/value pair to the dictionary (such as 'base':TYPE). The syntax of example 2 is not extensible, because the right hand side can only be a type. We have used name encoding to add a property: "'*mumble': 'int'" associates 'mumble' with (type int) and (optional true). Nice, but doesn't scale. So the solution is to change our existing uses to be syntactic sugar to an extensible form: NAME: TYPE --> NAME: { 'type': TYPE, 'optional': false } *ONAME: TYPE --> ONAME: { 'type': TYPE, 'optional': true } This patch fixes the testsuite to avoid inline nested types, by breaking the nesting into explicit types; it means that the type is now boxed instead of unboxed in C code, but makes no difference on the wire (and if desired, a later patch could change the generator to not do so much boxing in C). When touching code to add new allocations, also convert existing allocations to consistently prefer typesafe g_new0 over g_malloc0 when a type name is involved. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-05-04 17:05:30 +02:00
'dict1': 'UserDefTwoDict' } }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefThree',
'data': { 'string0': 'str' } }
qapi: Lazy creation of array types Commit ac88219a had several TODO markers about whether we needed to automatically create the corresponding array type alongside any other type. It turns out that most of the time, we don't! There are a few exceptions: 1) We have a few situations where we use an array type in internal code but do not expose that type through QMP; fix it by declaring a dummy type that forces the generator to see that we want to use the array type. 2) The builtin arrays (such as intList for QAPI ['int']) must always be generated, because of the way our QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN compile guard works: we have situations (at the very least tests/test-qmp-output-visitor.c) that include both top-level "qapi-types.h" (via "error.h") and a secondary "test-qapi-types.h". If we were to only emit the builtin types when used locally, then the first .h file would not include all types, but the second .h does not declare anything at all because the first .h set QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN, and we would end up with compilation error due to things like unknown type 'int8List'. Actually, we may need to revisit how we do type guards, and change from a single QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN over to a different usage pattern that does one #ifdef per qapi type - right now, the only types that are declared multiple times between two qapi .json files for inclusion by a single .c file happen to be the builtin arrays. But now that we have QAPI 'include' statements, it is logical to assume that we will soon reach a point where we want to reuse non-builtin types (yes, I'm thinking about what it will take to add introspection to QGA, where we will want to reuse the SchemaInfo type and friends). One #ifdef per type will help ensure that generating the same qapi type into more than one qapi-types.h won't cause collisions when both are included in the same .c file; but we also have to solve how to avoid creating duplicate qapi-types.c entry points. So that is a problem left for another day. Generated code for qapi-types and qapi-visit is drastically reduced; less than a third of the arrays that were blindly created were actually needed (a quick grep shows we dropped from 219 to 69 *List types), and the .o files lost more than 30% of their bulk. [For best results, diff the generated files with 'git diff --patience --no-index pre post'.] Interestingly, the introspection output is unchanged - this is because we already cull all types that are not indirectly reachable from a command or event, so introspection was already using only a subset of array types. The subset of types introspected is now a much larger percentage of the overall set of array types emitted in qapi-types.h (since the larger set shrunk), but still not 100% (evidence that the array types emitted for our new Dummy structs, and the new struct itself, don't affect QMP). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1444710158-8723-9-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Moved array info tracking to a later patch] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-10-13 06:22:28 +02:00
# dummy struct to force generation of array types not otherwise mentioned
{ 'struct': 'ForceArrays',
'data': { 'unused1':['UserDefOne'], 'unused2':['UserDefTwo'],
'unused3':['TestStruct'] } }
qapi: Lazy creation of array types Commit ac88219a had several TODO markers about whether we needed to automatically create the corresponding array type alongside any other type. It turns out that most of the time, we don't! There are a few exceptions: 1) We have a few situations where we use an array type in internal code but do not expose that type through QMP; fix it by declaring a dummy type that forces the generator to see that we want to use the array type. 2) The builtin arrays (such as intList for QAPI ['int']) must always be generated, because of the way our QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN compile guard works: we have situations (at the very least tests/test-qmp-output-visitor.c) that include both top-level "qapi-types.h" (via "error.h") and a secondary "test-qapi-types.h". If we were to only emit the builtin types when used locally, then the first .h file would not include all types, but the second .h does not declare anything at all because the first .h set QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN, and we would end up with compilation error due to things like unknown type 'int8List'. Actually, we may need to revisit how we do type guards, and change from a single QAPI_TYPES_BUILTIN over to a different usage pattern that does one #ifdef per qapi type - right now, the only types that are declared multiple times between two qapi .json files for inclusion by a single .c file happen to be the builtin arrays. But now that we have QAPI 'include' statements, it is logical to assume that we will soon reach a point where we want to reuse non-builtin types (yes, I'm thinking about what it will take to add introspection to QGA, where we will want to reuse the SchemaInfo type and friends). One #ifdef per type will help ensure that generating the same qapi type into more than one qapi-types.h won't cause collisions when both are included in the same .c file; but we also have to solve how to avoid creating duplicate qapi-types.c entry points. So that is a problem left for another day. Generated code for qapi-types and qapi-visit is drastically reduced; less than a third of the arrays that were blindly created were actually needed (a quick grep shows we dropped from 219 to 69 *List types), and the .o files lost more than 30% of their bulk. [For best results, diff the generated files with 'git diff --patience --no-index pre post'.] Interestingly, the introspection output is unchanged - this is because we already cull all types that are not indirectly reachable from a command or event, so introspection was already using only a subset of array types. The subset of types introspected is now a much larger percentage of the overall set of array types emitted in qapi-types.h (since the larger set shrunk), but still not 100% (evidence that the array types emitted for our new Dummy structs, and the new struct itself, don't affect QMP). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1444710158-8723-9-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Moved array info tracking to a later patch] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-10-13 06:22:28 +02:00
# for testing unions
qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit d90675f, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit 0f61af3e and 1e6c1616, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-09-30 00:21:03 +02:00
# Among other things, test that a name collision between branches does
# not cause any problems (since only one branch can be in use at a time),
# by intentionally using two branches that both have a C member 'a_b'
{ 'struct': 'UserDefA',
qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit d90675f, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit 0f61af3e and 1e6c1616, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-09-30 00:21:03 +02:00
'data': { 'boolean': 'bool', '*a_b': 'int' } }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefB',
qapi: Test for various name collisions Expose some weaknesses in the generator: we don't always forbid the generation of structs that contain multiple members that map to the same C or QMP name. This has already been marked FIXME in qapi.py in commit d90675f, but having more tests will make sure future patches produce desired behavior; and updating existing patches to better document things doesn't hurt, either. Some of these collisions are already caught in the old-style parser checks, but ultimately we want all collisions to be caught in the new-style QAPISchema*.check() methods. This patch focuses on C struct members, and does not consider collisions between commands and events (affecting C function names), or even collisions between generated C type names with user type names (for things like automatic FOOList struct representing array types or FOOKind for an implicit enum). There are two types of struct collisions we want to catch: 1) Collision between two keys in a JSON object. qapi.py prevents that within a single struct (see test duplicate-key), but it is possible to have collisions between a type's members and its base type's members (existing tests struct-base-clash, struct-base-clash-deep), and its flat union variant members (renamed test flat-union-clash-member). 2) Collision between two members of the C struct that is generated for a given QAPI type: a) Multiple QAPI names map to the same C name (new test args-name-clash) b) A QAPI name maps to a C name that is used for another purpose (new tests flat-union-clash-branch, struct-base-clash-base, union-clash-data). We already fixed some such cases in commit 0f61af3e and 1e6c1616, but more remain. c) Two C names generated for other purposes clash (updated test alternate-clash, new test union-clash-branches, union-clash-type, flat-union-clash-type) Ultimately, if we need to have a flat union where a tag value clashes with a base member name, we could change the generator to name the union (using 'foo.u.value' rather than 'foo.value') or otherwise munge the C name corresponding to tag values. But unless such a need arises, it will probably be easier to just forbid these collisions. Some of these negative tests will be deleted later, and positive tests added to qapi-schema-test.json in their place, when the generator code is reworked to avoid particular code generation collisions in class 2). [Note that viewing this patch with git rename detection enabled may see some confusion due to renaming some tests while adding others, but where the content is similar enough that git picks the wrong pre- and post-patch files to associate] Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-6-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> [Improve commit message and comments a bit, drop an unrelated test] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2015-09-30 00:21:03 +02:00
'data': { 'intb': 'int', '*a-b': 'bool' } }
{ 'union': 'UserDefFlatUnion',
'base': 'UserDefUnionBase', # intentional forward reference
'discriminator': 'enum1',
'data': { 'value1' : {'type': 'UserDefA'},
'value2' : 'UserDefB',
'value3' : 'UserDefB'
# 'value4' defaults to empty
} }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefUnionBase',
'base': 'UserDefZero',
'data': { 'string': 'str', 'enum1': 'EnumOne' } }
# this variant of UserDefFlatUnion defaults to a union that uses members with
# allocated types to test corner cases in the cleanup/dealloc visitor
{ 'union': 'UserDefFlatUnion2',
'base': { '*integer': 'int', 'string': 'str', 'enum1': 'QEnumTwo' },
'discriminator': 'enum1',
'data': { 'value1' : 'UserDefC', # intentional forward reference
'value2' : 'UserDefB' } }
{ 'struct': 'WrapAlternate',
'data': { 'alt': 'UserDefAlternate' } }
{ 'alternate': 'UserDefAlternate',
'data': { 'udfu': {'type': 'UserDefFlatUnion'}, 'e': 'EnumOne', 'i': 'int',
'n': 'null' } }
{ 'struct': 'UserDefC',
'data': { 'string1': 'str', 'string2': 'str' } }
# for testing use of 'number' within alternates
{ 'alternate': 'AltEnumBool', 'data': { 'e': 'EnumOne', 'b': 'bool' } }
{ 'alternate': 'AltEnumNum', 'data': { 'e': 'EnumOne', 'n': 'number' } }
{ 'alternate': 'AltNumEnum', 'data': { 'n': 'number', 'e': 'EnumOne' } }
{ 'alternate': 'AltEnumInt', 'data': { 'e': 'EnumOne', 'i': 'int' } }
{ 'alternate': 'AltListInt', 'data': { 'l': ['int'], 'i': 'int' } }
qapi: Reject alternates that can't work with keyval_parse() Alternates are sum types like unions, but use the JSON type on the wire / QType in QObject instead of an explicit tag. That's why we require alternate members to have distinct QTypes. The recently introduced keyval_parse() (commit d454dbe) can only produce string scalars. The qobject_input_visitor_new_keyval() input visitor mostly hides the difference, so code using a QObject input visitor doesn't have to care whether its input was parsed from JSON or KEY=VALUE,... The difference leaks for alternates, as noted in commit 0ee9ae7: a non-string, non-enum scalar alternate value can't currently be expressed. In part, this is just our insufficiently sophisticated implementation. Consider alternate type 'GuestFileWhence'. It has an integer member and a 'QGASeek' member. The latter is an enumeration with values 'set', 'cur', 'end'. The meaning of b=set, b=cur, b=end, b=0, b=1 and so forth is perfectly obvious. However, our current implementation falls apart at run time for b=0, b=1, and so forth. Fixable, but not today; add a test case and a TODO comment. Now consider an alternate type with a string and an integer member. What's the meaning of a=42? Is it the string "42" or the integer 42? Whichever meaning you pick makes the other inexpressible. This isn't just an implementation problem, it's fundamental. Our current implementation will pick string. So far, we haven't needed such alternates. To make sure we stop and think before we add one that cannot sanely work with keyval_parse(), let's require alternate members to have sufficiently distinct representation in KEY=VALUE,... syntax: * A string member clashes with any other scalar member * An enumeration member clashes with bool members when it has value 'on' or 'off'. * An enumeration member clashes with numeric members when it has a value that starts with '-', '+', or a decimal digit. This is a rather lazy approximation of the actual number syntax accepted by the visitor. Note that enumeration values starting with '-' and '+' are rejected elsewhere already, but better safe than sorry. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1495471335-23707-5-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
2017-05-22 18:42:15 +02:00
# for testing use of 'str' within alternates
{ 'alternate': 'AltStrObj', 'data': { 's': 'str', 'o': 'TestStruct' } }
{ 'struct': 'ArrayStruct',
'data': { 'integer': ['int'],
's8': ['int8'],
's16': ['int16'],
's32': ['int32'],
's64': ['int64'],
'u8': ['uint8'],
'u16': ['uint16'],
'u32': ['uint32'],
'u64': ['uint64'],
'number': ['number'],
'boolean': ['bool'],
'string': ['str'],
'*sz': ['size'],
'*any': ['any'],
'*user': ['Status'] } } # intentional forward ref. to sub-module
# for testing sub-modules
{ 'include': 'include/sub-module.json' }
# testing commands
{ 'command': 'user-def-cmd', 'data': {} }
{ 'command': 'user-def-cmd1', 'data': {'ud1a': 'UserDefOne'} }
{ 'command': 'user-def-cmd2',
'data': {'ud1a': {'type': 'UserDefOne'}, '*ud1b': 'UserDefOne'},
'returns': 'UserDefTwo' }
{ 'command': 'cmd-success-response', 'data': {}, 'success-response': false }
{ 'command': 'coroutine-cmd', 'data': {}, 'coroutine': true }
# Returning a non-dictionary requires a name from the whitelist
{ 'command': 'guest-get-time', 'data': {'a': 'int', '*b': 'int' },
'returns': 'int' }
{ 'command': 'guest-sync', 'data': { 'arg': 'any' }, 'returns': 'any' }
qapi: Implement boxed types for commands/events Turn on the ability to pass command and event arguments in a single boxed parameter, which must name a non-empty type (although the type can be a struct with all optional members). For structs, it makes it possible to pass a single qapi type instead of a breakout of all struct members (useful if the arguments are already in a struct or if the number of members is large); for other complex types, it is now possible to use a union or alternate as the data for a command or event. The empty type may be technically feasible if needed down the road, but it's easier to forbid it now and relax things to allow it later, than it is to allow it now and have to special case how the generated 'q_empty' type is handled (see commit 7ce106a9 for reasons why nothing is generated for the empty type). An alternate type is never considered empty, but now that a boxed type can be either an object or an alternate, we have to provide a trivial QAPISchemaAlternateType.is_empty(). The new call to arg_type.is_empty() during QAPISchemaCommand.check() requires that we first check the type in question; but there is no chance of introducing a cycle since objects do not refer back to commands. We still have a split in syntax checking between ad-hoc parsing up front (merely validates that 'boxed' has a sane value) and during .check() methods (if 'boxed' is set, then 'data' must name a non-empty user-defined type). Generated code is unchanged, as long as no client uses the new feature. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Test files renamed to *-boxed-*] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-07-14 05:50:20 +02:00
{ 'command': 'boxed-struct', 'boxed': true, 'data': 'UserDefZero' }
{ 'command': 'boxed-union', 'data': 'UserDefFlatUnion', 'boxed': true }
{ 'command': 'boxed-empty', 'boxed': true, 'data': 'Empty1' }
# Smoke test on out-of-band and allow-preconfig-test
{ 'command': 'test-flags-command', 'allow-oob': true, 'allow-preconfig': true }
# For testing integer range flattening in opts-visitor. The following schema
# corresponds to the option format:
#
# -userdef i64=3-6,i64=-5--1,u64=2,u16=1,u16=7-12
#
# For simplicity, this example doesn't use [type=]discriminator nor optargs
# specific to discriminator values.
{ 'struct': 'UserDefOptions',
'data': {
'*i64' : [ 'int' ],
'*u64' : [ 'uint64' ],
'*u16' : [ 'uint16' ],
'*i64x': 'int' ,
'*u64x': 'uint64' } }
# testing event
{ 'struct': 'EventStructOne',
'data': { 'struct1': {'type': 'UserDefOne'}, 'string': 'str', '*enum2': 'EnumOne' } }
{ 'event': 'EVENT_A' }
{ 'event': 'EVENT_B',
'data': { } }
{ 'event': 'EVENT_C',
'data': { '*a': 'int', '*b': 'UserDefOne', 'c': 'str' } }
{ 'event': 'EVENT_D',
'data': { 'a' : 'EventStructOne', 'b' : 'str', '*c': 'str', '*enum3': 'EnumOne' } }
qapi: Implement boxed types for commands/events Turn on the ability to pass command and event arguments in a single boxed parameter, which must name a non-empty type (although the type can be a struct with all optional members). For structs, it makes it possible to pass a single qapi type instead of a breakout of all struct members (useful if the arguments are already in a struct or if the number of members is large); for other complex types, it is now possible to use a union or alternate as the data for a command or event. The empty type may be technically feasible if needed down the road, but it's easier to forbid it now and relax things to allow it later, than it is to allow it now and have to special case how the generated 'q_empty' type is handled (see commit 7ce106a9 for reasons why nothing is generated for the empty type). An alternate type is never considered empty, but now that a boxed type can be either an object or an alternate, we have to provide a trivial QAPISchemaAlternateType.is_empty(). The new call to arg_type.is_empty() during QAPISchemaCommand.check() requires that we first check the type in question; but there is no chance of introducing a cycle since objects do not refer back to commands. We still have a split in syntax checking between ad-hoc parsing up front (merely validates that 'boxed' has a sane value) and during .check() methods (if 'boxed' is set, then 'data' must name a non-empty user-defined type). Generated code is unchanged, as long as no client uses the new feature. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1468468228-27827-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> [Test files renamed to *-boxed-*] Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-07-14 05:50:20 +02:00
{ 'event': 'EVENT_E', 'boxed': true, 'data': 'UserDefZero' }
{ 'event': 'EVENT_F', 'boxed': true, 'data': 'UserDefFlatUnion' }
{ 'event': 'EVENT_G', 'boxed': true, 'data': 'Empty1' }
# test that we correctly compile downstream extensions, as well as munge
# ticklish names
# also test union and alternate with just one branch
{ 'enum': '__org.qemu_x-Enum', 'data': [ '__org.qemu_x-value' ] }
{ 'struct': '__org.qemu_x-Base',
'data': { '__org.qemu_x-member1': '__org.qemu_x-Enum' } }
{ 'struct': '__org.qemu_x-Struct', 'base': '__org.qemu_x-Base',
'data': { '__org.qemu_x-member2': 'str', '*wchar-t': 'int' } }
{ 'alternate': '__org.qemu_x-Alt1', 'data': { '__org.qemu_x-branch': 'str' } }
{ 'struct': '__org.qemu_x-Struct2',
'data': { 'array': ['__org.qemu_x-Union'] } }
{ 'union': '__org.qemu_x-Union', 'base': '__org.qemu_x-Base',
'discriminator': '__org.qemu_x-member1',
'data': { '__org.qemu_x-value': '__org.qemu_x-Struct2' } }
{ 'alternate': '__org.qemu_x-Alt',
'data': { '__org.qemu_x-branch': '__org.qemu_x-Base' } }
{ 'event': '__ORG.QEMU_X-EVENT', 'data': '__org.qemu_x-Struct' }
{ 'command': '__org.qemu_x-command',
'data': { 'a': ['__org.qemu_x-Enum'], 'b': ['__org.qemu_x-Struct'],
'c': '__org.qemu_x-Union', 'd': '__org.qemu_x-Alt' } }
# test 'if' condition handling
{ 'struct': 'TestIfStruct',
'data': { 'foo': 'int',
'bar': { 'type': 'int', 'if': 'TEST_IF_STRUCT_BAR'} },
'if': 'TEST_IF_STRUCT' }
{ 'enum': 'TestIfEnum',
'data': [ 'foo', { 'name' : 'bar', 'if': 'TEST_IF_ENUM_BAR' } ],
'if': 'TEST_IF_ENUM' }
{ 'union': 'TestIfUnion',
'base': { 'type': 'TestIfEnum' },
'discriminator': 'type',
'data': { 'foo': 'TestStruct',
'bar': { 'type': 'UserDefZero', 'if': 'TEST_IF_ENUM_BAR'} },
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_UNION', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
{ 'command': 'test-if-union-cmd',
'data': { 'union-cmd-arg': 'TestIfUnion' },
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_UNION', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
{ 'alternate': 'TestIfAlternate',
'data': { 'foo': 'int',
'bar': { 'type': 'TestStruct', 'if': 'TEST_IF_ALT_BAR'} },
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_ALT', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
{ 'command': 'test-if-alternate-cmd',
'data': { 'alt-cmd-arg': 'TestIfAlternate' },
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_ALT', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
{ 'command': 'test-if-cmd',
'data': {
'foo': 'TestIfStruct',
'bar': { 'type': 'TestIfEnum', 'if': 'TEST_IF_CMD_BAR' } },
'returns': 'UserDefThree',
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_CMD', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
{ 'command': 'test-cmd-return-def-three', 'returns': 'UserDefThree' }
{ 'event': 'TEST_IF_EVENT',
'data': { 'foo': 'TestIfStruct',
'bar': { 'type': ['TestIfEnum'], 'if': 'TEST_IF_EVT_BAR' } },
'if': { 'all': ['TEST_IF_EVT', 'TEST_IF_STRUCT'] } }
{ 'event': 'TEST_IF_EVENT2', 'data': {},
'if': { 'not': { 'any': [ { 'not': 'TEST_IF_EVT' },
{ 'not': 'TEST_IF_STRUCT' } ] } } }
# test 'features'
{ 'struct': 'FeatureStruct0',
'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
'features': [] }
{ 'struct': 'FeatureStruct1',
'data': { 'foo': { 'type': 'int', 'features': [ 'deprecated' ] } },
'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
{ 'struct': 'FeatureStruct2',
qapi: New special feature flag "unstable" By convention, names starting with "x-" are experimental. The parts of external interfaces so named may be withdrawn or changed incompatibly in future releases. The naming convention makes unstable interfaces easy to recognize. Promoting something from experimental to stable involves a name change. Client code needs to be updated. Occasionally bothersome. Worse, the convention is not universally observed: * QOM type "input-barrier" has properties "x-origin", "y-origin". Looks accidental, but it's ABI since 4.2. * QOM types "memory-backend-file", "memory-backend-memfd", "memory-backend-ram", and "memory-backend-epc" have a property "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" that is documented to be stable despite its name. We could document these exceptions, but documentation helps only humans. We want to recognize "unstable" in code, like "deprecated". So support recognizing it the same way: introduce new special feature flag "unstable". It will be treated specially by the QAPI generator, like the existing feature flag "deprecated", and unlike regular feature flags. This commit updates documentation and prepares tests. The next commit updates the QAPI schema. The remaining patches update the QAPI generator and wire up -compat policy checking. Management applications can then use query-qmp-schema and -compat to manage or guard against use of unstable interfaces the same way as for deprecated interfaces. docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt no longer mandates the naming convention. Using it anyway might help writers of programs that aren't full-fledged management applications. Not using it can save us bothersome renames. We'll see how that shakes out. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20211028102520.747396-2-armbru@redhat.com>
2021-10-28 12:25:12 +02:00
'data': { 'foo': { 'type': 'int', 'features': [ 'unstable' ] } },
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1' } ] }
{ 'struct': 'FeatureStruct3',
'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
'features': [ 'feature1', 'feature2' ] }
{ 'struct': 'FeatureStruct4',
'data': { 'namespace-test': 'int' },
'features': [ 'namespace-test', 'int', 'name', 'if' ] }
{ 'struct': 'CondFeatureStruct1',
'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'TEST_IF_FEATURE_1'} ] }
{ 'struct': 'CondFeatureStruct2',
'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'TEST_IF_FEATURE_1'},
{ 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'TEST_IF_FEATURE_2'} ] }
{ 'struct': 'CondFeatureStruct3',
'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1',
'if': { 'all': [ 'TEST_IF_COND_1',
'TEST_IF_COND_2'] } } ] }
{ 'struct': 'CondFeatureStruct4',
'data': { 'foo': 'int' },
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1',
'if': {'any': ['TEST_IF_COND_1',
'TEST_IF_COND_2'] } } ] }
{ 'enum': 'FeatureEnum1',
'data': [ 'eins', 'zwei',
{ 'name': 'drei', 'features': [ 'deprecated' ] } ],
'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
{ 'union': 'FeatureUnion1',
'base': { 'tag': 'FeatureEnum1' },
'discriminator': 'tag',
'data': { 'eins': 'FeatureStruct1' },
'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
{ 'alternate': 'FeatureAlternate1',
'data': { 'eins': 'FeatureStruct1' },
'features': [ 'feature1' ] }
{ 'command': 'test-features0',
'data': { '*fs0': 'FeatureStruct0',
'*fs1': 'FeatureStruct1',
'*fs2': 'FeatureStruct2',
'*fs3': 'FeatureStruct3',
'*fs4': 'FeatureStruct4',
'*cfs1': 'CondFeatureStruct1',
'*cfs2': 'CondFeatureStruct2',
'*cfs3': 'CondFeatureStruct3',
'*cfs4': 'CondFeatureStruct4' },
'returns': 'FeatureStruct1',
'features': [] }
{ 'command': 'test-command-features1',
'features': [ 'deprecated' ] }
{ 'command': 'test-command-features3',
qapi: New special feature flag "unstable" By convention, names starting with "x-" are experimental. The parts of external interfaces so named may be withdrawn or changed incompatibly in future releases. The naming convention makes unstable interfaces easy to recognize. Promoting something from experimental to stable involves a name change. Client code needs to be updated. Occasionally bothersome. Worse, the convention is not universally observed: * QOM type "input-barrier" has properties "x-origin", "y-origin". Looks accidental, but it's ABI since 4.2. * QOM types "memory-backend-file", "memory-backend-memfd", "memory-backend-ram", and "memory-backend-epc" have a property "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" that is documented to be stable despite its name. We could document these exceptions, but documentation helps only humans. We want to recognize "unstable" in code, like "deprecated". So support recognizing it the same way: introduce new special feature flag "unstable". It will be treated specially by the QAPI generator, like the existing feature flag "deprecated", and unlike regular feature flags. This commit updates documentation and prepares tests. The next commit updates the QAPI schema. The remaining patches update the QAPI generator and wire up -compat policy checking. Management applications can then use query-qmp-schema and -compat to manage or guard against use of unstable interfaces the same way as for deprecated interfaces. docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt no longer mandates the naming convention. Using it anyway might help writers of programs that aren't full-fledged management applications. Not using it can save us bothersome renames. We'll see how that shakes out. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20211028102520.747396-2-armbru@redhat.com>
2021-10-28 12:25:12 +02:00
'features': [ 'unstable', 'feature1', 'feature2' ] }
{ 'command': 'test-command-cond-features1',
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'TEST_IF_FEATURE_1'} ] }
{ 'command': 'test-command-cond-features2',
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1', 'if': 'TEST_IF_FEATURE_1'},
{ 'name': 'feature2', 'if': 'TEST_IF_FEATURE_2'} ] }
{ 'command': 'test-command-cond-features3',
'features': [ { 'name': 'feature1',
'if': { 'all': [ 'TEST_IF_COND_1',
'TEST_IF_COND_2'] } } ] }
{ 'event': 'TEST_EVENT_FEATURES0',
'data': 'FeatureStruct1' }
{ 'event': 'TEST_EVENT_FEATURES1',
'features': [ 'deprecated' ] }
qapi: New special feature flag "unstable" By convention, names starting with "x-" are experimental. The parts of external interfaces so named may be withdrawn or changed incompatibly in future releases. The naming convention makes unstable interfaces easy to recognize. Promoting something from experimental to stable involves a name change. Client code needs to be updated. Occasionally bothersome. Worse, the convention is not universally observed: * QOM type "input-barrier" has properties "x-origin", "y-origin". Looks accidental, but it's ABI since 4.2. * QOM types "memory-backend-file", "memory-backend-memfd", "memory-backend-ram", and "memory-backend-epc" have a property "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" that is documented to be stable despite its name. We could document these exceptions, but documentation helps only humans. We want to recognize "unstable" in code, like "deprecated". So support recognizing it the same way: introduce new special feature flag "unstable". It will be treated specially by the QAPI generator, like the existing feature flag "deprecated", and unlike regular feature flags. This commit updates documentation and prepares tests. The next commit updates the QAPI schema. The remaining patches update the QAPI generator and wire up -compat policy checking. Management applications can then use query-qmp-schema and -compat to manage or guard against use of unstable interfaces the same way as for deprecated interfaces. docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt no longer mandates the naming convention. Using it anyway might help writers of programs that aren't full-fledged management applications. Not using it can save us bothersome renames. We'll see how that shakes out. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20211028102520.747396-2-armbru@redhat.com>
2021-10-28 12:25:12 +02:00
{ 'event': 'TEST_EVENT_FEATURES2',
'features': [ 'unstable' ] }