2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
QEMU Monitor Protocol Specification - Version 0.1
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document specifies the QEMU Monitor Protocol (QMP), a JSON-based protocol
|
|
|
|
which is available for applications to control QEMU at the machine-level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To enable QMP support, QEMU has to be run in "control mode". This is done by
|
|
|
|
starting QEMU with the appropriate command-line options. Please, refer to the
|
|
|
|
QEMU manual page for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Protocol Specification
|
|
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This section details the protocol format. For the purpose of this document
|
|
|
|
"Client" is any application which is communicating with QEMU in control mode,
|
|
|
|
and "Server" is QEMU itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JSON data structures, when mentioned in this document, are always in the
|
|
|
|
following format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
json-DATA-STRUCTURE-NAME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where DATA-STRUCTURE-NAME is any valid JSON data structure, as defined by
|
|
|
|
the JSON standard:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
For convenience, json-object members and json-array elements mentioned in
|
|
|
|
this document will be in a certain order. However, in real protocol usage
|
|
|
|
they can be in ANY order, thus no particular order should be assumed.
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 General Definitions
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.1 All interactions transmitted by the Server are json-objects, always
|
|
|
|
terminating with CRLF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.2 All json-objects members are mandatory when not specified otherwise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Server Greeting
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right when connected the Server will issue a greeting message, which signals
|
|
|
|
that the connection has been successfully established and that the Server is
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
ready for capabilities negotiation (for more information refer to section
|
|
|
|
'4. Capabilities Negotiation').
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format is:
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:04 +01:00
|
|
|
{ "QMP": { "version": json-object, "capabilities": json-array } }
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:04 +01:00
|
|
|
- The "version" member contains the Server's version information (the format
|
|
|
|
is the same of the 'query-version' command)
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
- The "capabilities" member specify the availability of features beyond the
|
|
|
|
baseline specification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 Issuing Commands
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format for command execution is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{ "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The "execute" member identifies the command to be executed by the Server
|
|
|
|
- The "arguments" member is used to pass any arguments required for the
|
|
|
|
execution of the command, it is optional when no arguments are required
|
|
|
|
- The "id" member is a transaction identification associated with the
|
|
|
|
command execution, it is optional and will be part of the response if
|
|
|
|
provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 Commands Responses
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two possible responses which the Server will issue as the result
|
|
|
|
of a command execution: success or error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4.1 success
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success response is issued when the command execution has finished
|
|
|
|
without errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format is:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
{ "return": json-object, "id": json-value }
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The "return" member contains the command returned data, which is defined
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
in a per-command basis or an empty json-object if the command does not
|
|
|
|
return data
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
- The "id" member contains the transaction identification associated
|
|
|
|
with the command execution (if issued by the Client)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4.2 error
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The error response is issued when the command execution could not be
|
|
|
|
completed because of an error condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format is:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
{ "error": { "class": json-string, "data": json-object, "desc": json-string },
|
2009-12-07 21:37:16 +01:00
|
|
|
"id": json-value }
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The "class" member contains the error class name (eg. "ServiceUnavailable")
|
|
|
|
- The "data" member contains specific error data and is defined in a
|
|
|
|
per-command basis, it will be an empty json-object if the error has no data
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
- The "desc" member is a human-readable error message. Clients should
|
2009-12-07 21:37:16 +01:00
|
|
|
not attempt to parse this message.
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
- The "id" member contains the transaction identification associated with
|
|
|
|
the command execution (if issued by the Client)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Some errors can occur before the Server is able to read the "id" member,
|
|
|
|
in these cases the "id" member will not be part of the error response, even
|
|
|
|
if provided by the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 Asynchronous events
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of state changes, the Server may send messages unilaterally
|
|
|
|
to the Client at any time. They are called 'asynchronous events'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format is:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
{ "event": json-string, "data": json-object,
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
"timestamp": { "seconds": json-number, "microseconds": json-number } }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The "event" member contains the event's name
|
|
|
|
- The "data" member contains event specific data, which is defined in a
|
|
|
|
per-event basis, it is optional
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
- The "timestamp" member contains the exact time of when the event occurred
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
in the Server. It is a fixed json-object with time in seconds and
|
|
|
|
microseconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a listing of supported asynchronous events, please, refer to the
|
|
|
|
qmp-events.txt file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. QMP Examples
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This section provides some examples of real QMP usage, in all of them
|
|
|
|
'C' stands for 'Client' and 'S' stands for 'Server'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Server greeting
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:04 +01:00
|
|
|
S: {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": "0.12.50", "package": ""}, "capabilities": []}}
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 Simple 'stop' execution
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C: { "execute": "stop" }
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
S: {"return": {}}
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 KVM information
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
C: { "execute": "query-kvm", "id": "example" }
|
|
|
|
S: {"return": {"enabled": true, "present": true}, "id": "example"}
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 Parsing error
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C: { "execute": }
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
S: {"error": {"class": "JSONParsing", "desc": "Invalid JSON syntax", "data":
|
|
|
|
{}}}
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 Powerdown event
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S: {"timestamp": {"seconds": 1258551470, "microseconds": 802384}, "event":
|
|
|
|
"POWERDOWN"}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
4. Capabilities Negotiation
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
When a Client successfully establishes a connection, the Server is in
|
|
|
|
Capabilities Negotiation mode.
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
In this mode only the 'qmp_capabilities' command is allowed to run, all
|
|
|
|
other commands will return the CommandNotFound error. Asynchronous messages
|
|
|
|
are not delivered either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients should use the 'qmp_capabilities' command to enable capabilities
|
|
|
|
advertised in the Server's greeting (section '2.2 Server Greeting') they
|
|
|
|
support.
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
When the 'qmp_capabilities' command is issued, and if it does not return an
|
|
|
|
error, the Server enters in Command mode where capabilities changes take
|
|
|
|
effect, all commands (except 'qmp_capabilities') are allowed and asynchronous
|
|
|
|
messages are delivered.
|
2009-11-27 01:59:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
5 Compatibility Considerations
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
All protocol changes or new features which modify the protocol format in an
|
|
|
|
incompatible way are disabled by default and will be advertised by the
|
|
|
|
capabilities array (section '2.2 Server Greeting'). Thus, Clients can check
|
|
|
|
that array and enable the capabilities they support.
|
2009-12-18 16:25:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-04 21:10:07 +01:00
|
|
|
Additionally, Clients must not assume any particular:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Size of json-objects or length of json-arrays
|
|
|
|
- Order of json-object members or json-array elements
|
|
|
|
- Amount of errors generated by a command, that is, new errors can be added
|
|
|
|
to any existing command in newer versions of the Server
|
2010-05-10 09:16:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Downstream extension of QMP
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recommend that downstream consumers of QEMU do *not* modify QMP.
|
|
|
|
Management tools should be able to support both upstream and downstream
|
|
|
|
versions of QMP without special logic, and downstream extensions are
|
|
|
|
inherently at odds with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, we recognize that it is sometimes impossible for downstreams to
|
|
|
|
avoid modifying QMP. Both upstream and downstream need to take care to
|
|
|
|
preserve long-term compatibility and interoperability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To help with that, QMP reserves JSON object member names beginning with
|
|
|
|
'__' (double underscore) for downstream use ("downstream names"). This
|
|
|
|
means upstream will never use any downstream names for its commands,
|
|
|
|
arguments, errors, asynchronous events, and so forth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any new names downstream wishes to add must begin with '__'. To
|
|
|
|
ensure compatibility with other downstreams, it is strongly
|
|
|
|
recommended that you prefix your downstram names with '__RFQDN_' where
|
|
|
|
RFQDN is a valid, reverse fully qualified domain name which you
|
|
|
|
control. For example, a qemu-kvm specific monitor command would be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(qemu) __org.linux-kvm_enable_irqchip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downstream must not change the server greeting (section 2.2) other than
|
|
|
|
to offer additional capabilities. But see below for why even that is
|
|
|
|
discouraged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section '5 Compatibility Considerations' applies to downstream as well
|
|
|
|
as to upstream, obviously. It follows that downstream must behave
|
|
|
|
exactly like upstream for any input not containing members with
|
|
|
|
downstream names ("downstream members"), except it may add members
|
|
|
|
with downstream names to its output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, a client should not be able to distinguish downstream from
|
|
|
|
upstream as long as it doesn't send input with downstream members, and
|
|
|
|
properly ignores any downstream members in the output it receives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advice on downstream modifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introducing new commands is okay. If you want to extend an existing
|
|
|
|
command, consider introducing a new one with the new behaviour
|
|
|
|
instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Introducing new asynchronous messages is okay. If you want to extend
|
|
|
|
an existing message, consider adding a new one instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Introducing new errors for use in new commands is okay. Adding new
|
|
|
|
errors to existing commands counts as extension, so 1. applies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. New capabilities are strongly discouraged. Capabilities are for
|
|
|
|
evolving the basic protocol, and multiple diverging basic protocol
|
|
|
|
dialects are most undesirable.
|