qemu-e2k/tests/.gitignore

101 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

atomic_add-bench
benchmark-crypto-cipher
benchmark-crypto-hash
benchmark-crypto-hmac
check-qdict
check-qnum
check-qjson
check-qlist
check-qlit
check-qnull
check-qobject
check-qstring
check-qom-interface
check-qom-proplist
qht: add qht-bench, a performance benchmark This serves as a performance benchmark as well as a stress test for QHT. We can tweak quite a number of things, including the number of resize threads and how frequently resizes are triggered. A performance comparison of QHT vs CLHT[1] and ck_hs[2] using this same benchmark program can be found here: http://imgur.com/a/0Bms4 The tests are run on a 64-core AMD Opteron 6376, pinning threads to cores favoring same-socket cores. For each run, qht-bench is invoked with: $ tests/qht-bench -d $duration -n $n -u $u -g $range , where $duration is in seconds, $n is the number of threads, $u is the update rate (0.0 to 100.0), and $range is the number of keys. Note that ck_hs's performance drops significantly as writes go up, since it requires an external lock (I used a ck_spinlock) around every write. Also, note that CLHT instead of using a seqlock, relies on an allocator that does not ever return the same address during the same read-critical section. This gives it a slight performance advantage over QHT on read-heavy workloads, since the seqlock writes aren't there. [1] CLHT: https://github.com/LPD-EPFL/CLHT https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/207109/files/ascy_asplos15.pdf [2] ck_hs: http://concurrencykit.org/ http://backtrace.io/blog/blog/2015/03/13/workload-specialization/ A few of those plots are shown in text here, since that site might not be online forever. Throughput is on Mops/s on the Y axis. 200K keys, 0 % updates 450 ++--+------+------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------+--++ | + + + + + + + + +N+ | 400 ++ ---+E+ ++ | +++---- | 350 ++ 9 ++------+------++ --+E+ -+H+ ++ | | +H+- | -+N+---- ---- +++ | 300 ++ 8 ++ +E+ ++ -----+E+ --+H+ ++ | | +++ | -+N+-----+H+-- | 250 ++ 7 ++------+------++ +++-----+E+---- ++ 200 ++ 1 -+E+-----+H+ ++ | ---- qht +-E--+ | 150 ++ -+E+ clht +-H--+ ++ | ---- ck +-N--+ | 100 ++ +E+ ++ | ---- | 50 ++ -+E+ ++ | +E+E+ + + + + + + + + | 0 ++--E------+------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------+--++ 1 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 Number of threads 200K keys, 1 % updates 350 ++--+------+------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------+--++ | + + + + + + + + -+E+ | 300 ++ -----+H+ ++ | +E+-- | | 9 ++------+------++ +++---- | 250 ++ | +E+ -- | -+E+ ++ | 8 ++ -- ++ ---- | 200 ++ | +++- | +++ ---+E+ ++ | 7 ++------N------++ -+E+-- qht +-E--+ | | 1 +++---- clht +-H--+ | 150 ++ -+E+ ck +-N--+ ++ | ---- | 100 ++ +E+ ++ | ---- | | -+E+ | 50 ++ +H+-+N+----+N+-----+N+------ ++ | +E+E+ + + + +N+-----+N+-----+N+----+N+-----+N+ | 0 ++--E------+------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------+--++ 1 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 Number of threads 200K keys, 20 % updates 300 ++--+------+------+-------+-------+-------+-------+------+-------+--++ | + + + + + + + + + | | -+H+ | 250 ++ ---- ++ | 9 ++------+------++ --+H+ ---+E+ | | 8 ++ +H+-- ++ -+H+----+E+-- | 200 ++ | +E+ --| -----+E+-- +++ ++ | 7 ++ + ---- ++ ---+H+---- +++ qht +-E--+ | 150 ++ 6 ++------N------++ -+H+-----+E+ clht +-H--+ ++ | 1 -----+E+-- ck +-N--+ | | -+H+---- | 100 ++ -----+E+ ++ | +E+-- | | ----+++ | 50 ++ -+E+ ++ | +E+ +++ | | +E+N+-+N+-----+ + + + + + + | 0 ++--E------+------N-------N-------N-------N-------N------N-------N--++ 1 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 Number of threads 200K keys, 100 % updates qht +-E--+ clht +-H--+ 160 ++--+------+------+-------+-------+-------+-------+---ck-+-N-----+--++ | + + + + + + + + ----H | 140 ++ +H+-- -+E+ ++ | +++---- ---- | 120 ++ 8 ++------+------++ -+H+ +E+ ++ | 7 ++ +H+---- ++ ---- +++---- | 100 ++ | +E+ | +++ ---+H+ -+E+ ++ | 6 ++ +++ ++ -+H+-- +++---- | 80 ++ 5 ++------N----------+E+-----+E+ ++ | 1 -+H+---- +++ | | -----+E+ | 60 ++ +H+---- +++ ++ | ----+E+ | 40 ++ +H+---- ++ | --+E+ | 20 ++ +E+ ++ | +EE+ + + + + + + + + | 0 ++--+N-N---N------N-------N-------N-------N-------N------N-------N--++ 1 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 Number of threads Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org> Message-Id: <1465412133-3029-13-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
2016-06-08 20:55:30 +02:00
qht-bench
rcutorture
test-aio
test-aio-multithread
test-arm-mptimer
test-base64
test-bdrv-drain
test-bitops
test-bitcnt
test-blockjob
test-blockjob-txn
test-bufferiszero
test-char
qapi: Add new clone visitor We have a couple places in the code base that want to deep-clone one QAPI object into another, and they were resorting to serializing the struct out to QObject then reparsing it. A much more efficient version can be done by adding a new clone visitor. Since cloning is still relatively uncommon, expose the use of the new visitor via a QAPI_CLONE() macro that takes care of type-punning the underlying function pointer, rather than generating lots of unused functions for types that won't be cloned. And yes, we're relying on the compiler treating all pointers equally, even though a strict C program cannot portably do so - but we're not the first one in the qemu code base to expect it to work (hello, glib!). The choice of adding a fourth visitor type deserves some explanation. On the surface, the clone visitor is mostly an input visitor (it takes arbitrary input - in this case, another QAPI object - and creates a new QAPI object during the course of the visit). But ever since commit da72ab0 consolidated enum visits based on the visitor type, using VISITOR_INPUT would cause us to run visit_type_str(), even though for cloning there is nothing to do (we just copy the enum value across, without regards to its mapping to strings). Also, since our input happens to be a QAPI object, we can also satisfy the internal checks for VISITOR_OUTPUT. So in the end, I settled with a new VISITOR_CLONE, and chose its value such that many internal checks can use 'v->type & mask', sticking to 'v->type == value' where the difference matters. Note that we can only clone objects (including alternates) and lists, not built-ins or enums. The visitor core hides integer width from the actual visitor (since commit 04e070d), and as long as that's the case, we can't clone top-level integers. Then again, those can always be cloned by direct copy, since they are not objects with deep pointers, so it's no real loss. And restricting cloning to just objects and lists is cleaner than restricting it to non-integers. As such, I documented that the clone visitor is for direct use only by code internal to QAPI, and should not be used on incomplete objects (other than a hack to work around the fact that we allow NULL in place of "" in visit_type_str() in other output visitors). Note that as written, the clone visitor will never fail on a complete object. Scalars (including enums) not at the root of the clone copy just fine with no additional effort while visiting the scalar, by virtue of a g_memdup() each time we push another struct onto the stack. Cloning a string requires deduplication of a pointer, which means it can also provide the guarantee of an input visitor of never producing NULL even when still accepting NULL in place of "" the way the QMP output visitor does. Cloning an 'any' type could be possible by incrementing the QObject refcnt, but it's not obvious whether that is better than implementing a QObject deep clone. So for now, we document it as unsupported, and intentionally omit the .type_any() callback to let a developer know their usage needs implementation. Add testsuite coverage for several different clone situations, to ensure that the code is working. I also tested that valgrind was happy with the test. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1465490926-28625-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
2016-06-09 18:48:44 +02:00
test-clone-visitor
test-coroutine
test-crypto-afsplit
test-crypto-block
test-crypto-cipher
test-crypto-hash
test-crypto-hmac
test-crypto-ivgen
test-crypto-pbkdf
crypto: add QCryptoSecret object class for password/key handling Introduce a new QCryptoSecret object class which will be used for providing passwords and keys to other objects which need sensitive credentials. The new object can provide secret values directly as properties, or indirectly via a file. The latter includes support for file descriptor passing syntax on UNIX platforms. Ordinarily passing secret values directly as properties is insecure, since they are visible in process listings, or in log files showing the CLI args / QMP commands. It is possible to use AES-256-CBC to encrypt the secret values though, in which case all that is visible is the ciphertext. For ad hoc developer testing though, it is fine to provide the secrets directly without encryption so this is not explicitly forbidden. The anticipated scenario is that libvirtd will create a random master key per QEMU instance (eg /var/run/libvirt/qemu/$VMNAME.key) and will use that key to encrypt all passwords it provides to QEMU via '-object secret,....'. This avoids the need for libvirt (or other mgmt apps) to worry about file descriptor passing. It also makes life easier for people who are scripting the management of QEMU, for whom FD passing is significantly more complex. Providing data inline (insecure, only for ad hoc dev testing) $QEMU -object secret,id=sec0,data=letmein Providing data indirectly in raw format printf "letmein" > mypasswd.txt $QEMU -object secret,id=sec0,file=mypasswd.txt Providing data indirectly in base64 format $QEMU -object secret,id=sec0,file=mykey.b64,format=base64 Providing data with encryption $QEMU -object secret,id=master0,file=mykey.b64,format=base64 \ -object secret,id=sec0,data=[base64 ciphertext],\ keyid=master0,iv=[base64 IV],format=base64 Note that 'format' here refers to the format of the ciphertext data. The decrypted data must always be in raw byte format. More examples are shown in the updated docs. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
2015-10-14 10:58:38 +02:00
test-crypto-secret
test-crypto-tlscredsx509
test-crypto-tlscredsx509-work/
test-crypto-tlscredsx509-certs/
test-crypto-tlssession
test-crypto-tlssession-work/
test-crypto-tlssession-client/
test-crypto-tlssession-server/
test-crypto-xts
test-cutils
test-hbitmap
test-hmp
test-int128
test-iov
test-io-channel-buffer
test-io-channel-command
test-io-channel-command.fifo
test-io-channel-file
test-io-channel-file.txt
test-io-channel-socket
test-io-channel-tls
test-io-task
keyval: New keyval_parse() keyval_parse() parses KEY=VALUE,... into a QDict. Works like qemu_opts_parse(), except: * Returns a QDict instead of a QemuOpts (d'oh). * Supports nesting, unlike QemuOpts: a KEY is split into key fragments at '.' (dotted key convention; the block layer does something similar on top of QemuOpts). The key fragments are QDict keys, and the last one's value is updated to VALUE. * Each key fragment may be up to 127 bytes long. qemu_opts_parse() limits the entire key to 127 bytes. * Overlong key fragments are rejected. qemu_opts_parse() silently truncates them. * Empty key fragments are rejected. qemu_opts_parse() happily accepts empty keys. * It does not store the returned value. qemu_opts_parse() stores it in the QemuOptsList. * It does not treat parameter "id" specially. qemu_opts_parse() ignores all but the first "id", and fails when its value isn't id_wellformed(), or duplicate (a QemuOpts with the same ID is already stored). It also screws up when a value contains ",id=". * Implied value is not supported. qemu_opts_parse() desugars "foo" to "foo=on", and "nofoo" to "foo=off". * An implied key's value can't be empty, and can't contain ','. I intend to grow this into a saner replacement for QemuOpts. It'll take time, though. Note: keyval_parse() provides no way to do lists, and its key syntax is incompatible with the __RFQDN_ prefix convention for downstream extensions, because it blindly splits at '.', even in __RFQDN_. Both issues will be addressed later in the series. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1488317230-26248-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
2017-02-28 22:26:49 +01:00
test-keyval
test-logging
test-mul64
test-opts-visitor
test-qapi-commands.[ch]
test-qapi-events.[ch]
test-qapi-types.[ch]
test-qapi-util
test-qapi-visit.[ch]
test-qdev-global-props
test-qemu-opts
test-qdist
test-qga
test-qht
test-qht-par
test-qmp-cmds
test-qmp-event
test-qobject-input-strict
test-qobject-input-visitor
test-qapi-introspect.[ch]
test-qobject-output-visitor
test-rcu-list
test-replication
test-shift128
test-string-input-visitor
test-string-output-visitor
test-thread-pool
test-throttle
test-timed-average
test-uuid
test-visitor-serialization
test-vmstate
test-write-threshold
test-x86-cpuid
test-x86-cpuid-compat
test-xbzrle
test-netfilter
test-filter-mirror
tests/test-filter-redirector: Add unit test for filter-redirector In this unit test,we will test the filter redirector function. Case 1, tx traffic flow: qemu side | test side | +---------+ | +-------+ | backend <---------------+ sock0 | +----+----+ | +-------+ | | +----v----+ +-------+ | | rd0 +->+chardev| | +---------+ +---+---+ | | | +---------+ | | | rd1 <------+ | +----+----+ | | | +----v----+ | +-------+ | rd2 +--------------->sock1 | +---------+ | +-------+ + a. we(sock0) inject packet to qemu socket backend b. backend pass packet to filter redirector0(rd0) c. rd0 redirect packet to out_dev(chardev) which is connected with filter redirector1's(rd1) in_dev d. rd1 read this packet from in_dev, and pass to next filter redirector2(rd2) e. rd2 redirect packet to rd2's out_dev which is connected with an opened socketed(sock1) f. we read packet from sock1 and compare to what we inject Start qemu with: "-netdev socket,id=qtest-bn0,fd=%d " "-device rtl8139,netdev=qtest-bn0,id=qtest-e0 " "-chardev socket,id=redirector0,path=%s,server,nowait " "-chardev socket,id=redirector1,path=%s,server,nowait " "-chardev socket,id=redirector2,path=%s,nowait " "-object filter-redirector,id=qtest-f0,netdev=qtest-bn0," "queue=tx,outdev=redirector0 " "-object filter-redirector,id=qtest-f1,netdev=qtest-bn0," "queue=tx,indev=redirector2 " "-object filter-redirector,id=qtest-f2,netdev=qtest-bn0," "queue=tx,outdev=redirector1 " -------------------------------------- Case 2, rx traffic flow qemu side | test side | +---------+ | +-------+ | backend +---------------> sock1 | +----^----+ | +-------+ | | +----+----+ +-------+ | | rd0 +<-+chardev| | +---------+ +---+---+ | ^ | +---------+ | | | rd1 +------+ | +----^----+ | | | +----+----+ | +-------+ | rd2 <---------------+sock0 | +---------+ | +-------+ a. we(sock0) insert packet to filter redirector2(rd2) b. rd2 pass packet to filter redirector1(rd1) c. rd1 redirect packet to out_dev(chardev) which is connected with filter redirector0's(rd0) in_dev d. rd0 read this packet from in_dev, and pass ti to qemu backend which is connected with an opened socketed(sock1) e. we read packet from sock1 and compare to what we inject Start qemu with: "-netdev socket,id=qtest-bn0,fd=%d " "-device rtl8139,netdev=qtest-bn0,id=qtest-e0 " "-chardev socket,id=redirector0,path=%s,server,nowait " "-chardev socket,id=redirector1,path=%s,server,nowait " "-chardev socket,id=redirector2,path=%s,nowait " "-object filter-redirector,id=qtest-f0,netdev=qtest-bn0," "queue=rx,outdev=redirector0 " "-object filter-redirector,id=qtest-f1,netdev=qtest-bn0," "queue=rx,indev=redirector2 " "-object filter-redirector,id=qtest-f2,netdev=qtest-bn0," "queue=rx,outdev=redirector1 " Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
2016-03-17 09:16:27 +01:00
test-filter-redirector
*-test
qapi-schema/*.test.*
vm/*.img