seccomp: avoid shadowing of 'action' variable

This is confusing as one 'action' variable is used for storing
a SCMP_ enum value, while the other 'action' variable is used
for storing a SECCOMP_ enum value.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922160644.438631-3-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel P. Berrangé 2023-09-22 17:06:44 +01:00 committed by Markus Armbruster
parent 3cc9fe177f
commit 0d57919acf
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -283,9 +283,9 @@ static uint32_t qemu_seccomp_update_action(uint32_t action)
if (action == SCMP_ACT_TRAP) {
static int kill_process = -1;
if (kill_process == -1) {
uint32_t action = SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
uint32_t testaction = SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
if (qemu_seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL, 0, &action) == 0) {
if (qemu_seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL, 0, &testaction) == 0) {
kill_process = 1;
} else {
kill_process = 0;