nbd: Advertise realistic limits to block layer
We were basing the advertisement of maximum discard and transfer length off of UINT32_MAX, but since the rest of the block layer has signed int limits on a transaction, nothing could ever reach that maximum, and we risk overflowing an int once things are converted to byte-based rather than sector-based limits. What's more, we DO have a much smaller limit: both the current kernel and qemu-nbd have a hard limit of 32M on a read or write transaction, and while they may also permit up to a full 32 bits on a discard transaction, the upstream NBD protocol is proposing wording that without any explicit advertisement otherwise, clients should limit ALL requests to the same limits as read and write, even though the other requests do not actually require as many bytes across the wire. So the better limit to tell the block layer is 32M for both values. Behavior doesn't actually change with this patch (the block layer is currently ignoring the max_transfer advertisements); but when that problem is fixed in a later series, this patch will prevent the exposure of a latent bug. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
476b923c32
commit
202204717a
@ -362,8 +362,8 @@ static int nbd_co_flush(BlockDriverState *bs)
|
||||
|
||||
static void nbd_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bs->bl.max_discard = UINT32_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
|
||||
bs->bl.max_transfer_length = UINT32_MAX >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
|
||||
bs->bl.max_discard = NBD_MAX_SECTORS;
|
||||
bs->bl.max_transfer_length = NBD_MAX_SECTORS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int nbd_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user