OpenE2K
/
qemu-e2k
13
4
Fork 0
Code Issues 4 Pull Requests Projects 2 Releases Activity

spapr: Fix buffer overflow in spapr_numa_associativity_init() 

Running a guest with 128 NUMA nodes crashes QEMU:

../../util/error.c:59: error_setv: Assertion `*errp == NULL' failed.

The crash happens when setting the FWNMI migration blocker:

2861	    if (spapr_get_cap(spapr, SPAPR_CAP_FWNMI) == SPAPR_CAP_ON) {
2862	        /* Create the error string for live migration blocker */
2863	        error_setg(&spapr->fwnmi_migration_blocker,
2864	            "A machine check is being handled during migration. The handler"
2865	            "may run and log hardware error on the destination");
2866	    }

Inspection reveals that papr->fwnmi_migration_blocker isn't NULL:

(gdb) p spapr->fwnmi_migration_blocker
$1 = (Error *) 0x8000000004000000

Since this is the only place where papr->fwnmi_migration_blocker is
set, this means someone wrote there in our back. Further analysis
points to spapr_numa_associativity_init(), especially the part
that initializes the associative arrays for NVLink GPUs:

    max_nodes_with_gpus = nb_numa_nodes + NVGPU_MAX_NUM;

ie. max_nodes_with_gpus = 128 + 6, but the array isn't sized to
accommodate the 6 extra nodes:

struct SpaprMachineState {
    .
    .
    .
    uint32_t numa_assoc_array[MAX_NODES][NUMA_ASSOC_SIZE];

    Error *fwnmi_migration_blocker;
};

and the following loops happily overwrite spapr->fwnmi_migration_blocker,
and probably more:

    for (i = nb_numa_nodes; i < max_nodes_with_gpus; i++) {
        spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][0] = cpu_to_be32(MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS);

        for (j = 1; j < MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS; j++) {
            uint32_t gpu_assoc = smc->pre_5_1_assoc_refpoints ?
                                 SPAPR_GPU_NUMA_ID : cpu_to_be32(i);
            spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][j] = gpu_assoc;
        }

        spapr->numa_assoc_array[i][MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS] = cpu_to_be32(i);
    }

Fix the size of the array. This requires "hw/ppc/spapr.h" to see
NVGPU_MAX_NUM. Including "hw/pci-host/spapr.h" introduces a
circular dependency that breaks the build, so this moves the
definition of NVGPU_MAX_NUM to "hw/ppc/spapr.h" instead.

Reported-by: Min Deng <mdeng@redhat.com>
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908693
Fixes: dd7e1d7ae4 ("spapr_numa: move NVLink2 associativity handling to spapr_numa.c")
Cc: danielhb413@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <160829960428.734871.12634150161215429514.stgit@bahia.lan>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
Greg Kurz 2020-12-18 14:53:24 +01:00 committed by David Gibson
parent 1e8b5b1aa1
commit 30499fdd98
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
View File

@ -115,8 +115,6 @@ struct SpaprPhbState {
#define SPAPR_PCI_NV2RAM64_WIN_BASE SPAPR_PCI_LIMIT
#define SPAPR_PCI_NV2RAM64_WIN_SIZE (2 * TiB) /* For up to 6 GPUs 256GB each */
/* Max number of these GPUsper a physical box */
#define NVGPU_MAX_NUM 6
/* Max number of NVLinks per GPU in any physical box */
#define NVGPU_MAX_LINKS 3

5
include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
View File

@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ typedef enum {
#define NUMA_ASSOC_SIZE (MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS + 1)
#define VCPU_ASSOC_SIZE (NUMA_ASSOC_SIZE + 1)
/* Max number of these GPUsper a physical box */
#define NVGPU_MAX_NUM 6
typedef struct SpaprCapabilities SpaprCapabilities;
struct SpaprCapabilities {
uint8_t caps[SPAPR_CAP_NUM];
@ -240,7 +243,7 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
unsigned gpu_numa_id;
SpaprTpmProxy *tpm_proxy;
uint32_t numa_assoc_array[MAX_NODES][NUMA_ASSOC_SIZE];
uint32_t numa_assoc_array[MAX_NODES + NVGPU_MAX_NUM][NUMA_ASSOC_SIZE];
Error *fwnmi_migration_blocker;
};