From 33ff4c9e081acdded2c90c8c1963f3403e16082b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hanna Reitz Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:41:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] block: Drop BDS comment regarding bdrv_append() There is a comment above the BDS definition stating care must be taken to consider handling newly added fields in bdrv_append(). Actually, this comment should have said "bdrv_swap()" as of 4ddc07cac (nine years ago), and in any case, bdrv_swap() was dropped in 8e419aefa (six years ago). So no such care is necessary anymore. Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf Message-Id: <20210812084148.14458-2-hreitz@redhat.com> --- include/block/block_int.h | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h index f1a54db0f8..12e5750fe8 100644 --- a/include/block/block_int.h +++ b/include/block/block_int.h @@ -839,12 +839,6 @@ struct BdrvChild { QLIST_ENTRY(BdrvChild) next_parent; }; -/* - * Note: the function bdrv_append() copies and swaps contents of - * BlockDriverStates, so if you add new fields to this struct, please - * inspect bdrv_append() to determine if the new fields need to be - * copied as well. - */ struct BlockDriverState { /* Protected by big QEMU lock or read-only after opening. No special * locking needed during I/O...