mips: Ensure PC update with MTC0 single-stepping
Correct the way PC is updated when single-stepping instructions, by keeping the old PC only for the BS_EXCP (exception condition) state. Some MTC0 (and possibly other) instructions switch to the BS_STOP state to terminate the current translation block, so that the state transition of the simulated CPU resulting from the CP0 operation takes effect with the following instruction. This happens with `mtc0 <reg>,c0_config' for example, typically used to set KSEG0 cacheability. While single-stepping this has a side-effect of not advancing the PC past the instruction just executed; subsequent single-step traps will stop at the same instruction repeatedly. Example: (gdb) stepi 0x80004d24 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d24 <_start+364>: mfc0 t1,c0_config (gdb) 0x80004d28 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d28 <_start+368>: li at,-8 (gdb) 0x80004d2c in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d2c <_start+372>: and t1,t1,at (gdb) 0x80004d30 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d30 <_start+376>: ori t1,t1,0x3 (gdb) 0x80004d34 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d34 <_start+380>: mtc0 t1,c0_config (gdb) 0x80004d34 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d34 <_start+380>: mtc0 t1,c0_config (gdb) 0x80004d34 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d34 <_start+380>: mtc0 t1,c0_config (gdb) 0x80004d34 in _start () 5: x/i $pc => 0x80004d34 <_start+380>: mtc0 t1,c0_config (gdb) -- oops! Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@codesourcery.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
854795753c
commit
342368aff7
@ -19112,7 +19112,7 @@ gen_intermediate_code_internal(MIPSCPU *cpu, TranslationBlock *tb,
|
||||
gen_io_end();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (cs->singlestep_enabled && ctx.bstate != BS_BRANCH) {
|
||||
save_cpu_state(&ctx, ctx.bstate == BS_NONE);
|
||||
save_cpu_state(&ctx, ctx.bstate != BS_EXCP);
|
||||
gen_helper_0e0i(raise_exception, EXCP_DEBUG);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
switch (ctx.bstate) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user