test-rcu-list: access n_reclaims and n_nodes_removed with atomic64
To avoid undefined behaviour. Note that these "atomics" are atomic in the "access once" sense. The variables are updated by a single thread at a time, so no "full" atomics are necessary. Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org> Message-Id: <20180910232752.31565-6-cota@braap.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac8c77486c
commit
39fe576c82
@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
|
||||
static QemuMutex counts_mutex;
|
||||
static long long n_reads = 0LL;
|
||||
static long long n_updates = 0LL;
|
||||
static long long n_reclaims = 0LL;
|
||||
static long long n_nodes_removed = 0LL;
|
||||
static int64_t n_reclaims;
|
||||
static int64_t n_nodes_removed;
|
||||
static long long n_nodes = 0LL;
|
||||
static int g_test_in_charge = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void reclaim_list_el(struct rcu_head *prcu)
|
||||
struct list_element *el = container_of(prcu, struct list_element, rcu);
|
||||
g_free(el);
|
||||
/* Accessed only from call_rcu thread. */
|
||||
n_reclaims++;
|
||||
atomic_set_i64(&n_reclaims, n_reclaims + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if TEST_LIST_TYPE == 1
|
||||
@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static void *rcu_q_updater(void *arg)
|
||||
qemu_mutex_lock(&counts_mutex);
|
||||
n_nodes += n_nodes_local;
|
||||
n_updates += n_updates_local;
|
||||
n_nodes_removed += n_removed_local;
|
||||
atomic_set_i64(&n_nodes_removed, n_nodes_removed + n_removed_local);
|
||||
qemu_mutex_unlock(&counts_mutex);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -286,19 +286,21 @@ static void rcu_qtest(const char *test, int duration, int nreaders)
|
||||
n_removed_local++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
qemu_mutex_lock(&counts_mutex);
|
||||
n_nodes_removed += n_removed_local;
|
||||
atomic_set_i64(&n_nodes_removed, n_nodes_removed + n_removed_local);
|
||||
qemu_mutex_unlock(&counts_mutex);
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
while (n_nodes_removed > n_reclaims) {
|
||||
while (atomic_read_i64(&n_nodes_removed) > atomic_read_i64(&n_reclaims)) {
|
||||
g_usleep(100);
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (g_test_in_charge) {
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(n_nodes_removed, ==, n_reclaims);
|
||||
g_assert_cmpint(atomic_read_i64(&n_nodes_removed), ==,
|
||||
atomic_read_i64(&n_reclaims));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printf("%s: %d readers; 1 updater; nodes read: " \
|
||||
"%lld, nodes removed: %lld; nodes reclaimed: %lld\n",
|
||||
test, nthreadsrunning - 1, n_reads, n_nodes_removed, n_reclaims);
|
||||
"%lld, nodes removed: %"PRIi64"; nodes reclaimed: %"PRIi64"\n",
|
||||
test, nthreadsrunning - 1, n_reads,
|
||||
atomic_read_i64(&n_nodes_removed), atomic_read_i64(&n_reclaims));
|
||||
exit(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user