hmp: use snapshot name to determine whether a snapshot is 'fully available'
Currently qemu uses snapshot id to determine whether a snapshot is fully available, It causes incorrect output in some scenario. For instance: (qemu) info block drive_image1 (#block113): /opt/vms/SLES12-SP1-JeOS-x86_64-GM/disk0.qcow2 (qcow2) Cache mode: writeback drive_image2 (#block349): /opt/vms/SLES12-SP1-JeOS-x86_64-GM/disk1.qcow2 (qcow2) Cache mode: writeback (qemu) (qemu) info snapshots There is no snapshot available. (qemu) (qemu) snapshot_blkdev_internal drive_image1 snap1 (qemu) (qemu) info snapshots There is no suitable snapshot available (qemu) (qemu) savevm checkpoint-1 (qemu) (qemu) info snapshots ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 snap1 0 2016-05-22 16:57:31 00:01:30.567 (qemu) $ qemu-img snapshot -l disk0.qcow2 Snapshot list: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 snap1 0 2016-05-22 16:57:31 00:01:30.567 2 checkpoint-1 165M 2016-05-22 16:58:07 00:02:06.813 $ qemu-img snapshot -l disk1.qcow2 Snapshot list: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 checkpoint-1 0 2016-05-22 16:58:07 00:02:06.813 The patch uses snapshot name instead of snapshot id to determine whether a snapshot is fully available and uses '--' instead of snapshot id in output because the snapshot id is not guaranteed to be the same on all images. For instance: (qemu) info snapshots List of snapshots present on all disks: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK -- checkpoint-1 165M 2016-05-22 16:58:07 00:02:06.813 Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <lma@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 1467869164-26688-2-git-send-email-lma@suse.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
435d5ee6cd
commit
3a1ee71190
@ -2230,7 +2230,7 @@ void hmp_info_snapshots(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
|
|||||||
available_snapshots = g_new0(int, nb_sns);
|
available_snapshots = g_new0(int, nb_sns);
|
||||||
total = 0;
|
total = 0;
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < nb_sns; i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < nb_sns; i++) {
|
||||||
if (bdrv_all_find_snapshot(sn_tab[i].id_str, &bs1) == 0) {
|
if (bdrv_all_find_snapshot(sn_tab[i].name, &bs1) == 0) {
|
||||||
available_snapshots[total] = i;
|
available_snapshots[total] = i;
|
||||||
total++;
|
total++;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -2241,6 +2241,10 @@ void hmp_info_snapshots(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
|
|||||||
monitor_printf(mon, "\n");
|
monitor_printf(mon, "\n");
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < total; i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < total; i++) {
|
||||||
sn = &sn_tab[available_snapshots[i]];
|
sn = &sn_tab[available_snapshots[i]];
|
||||||
|
/* The ID is not guaranteed to be the same on all images, so
|
||||||
|
* overwrite it.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
pstrcpy(sn->id_str, sizeof(sn->id_str), "--");
|
||||||
bdrv_snapshot_dump((fprintf_function)monitor_printf, mon, sn);
|
bdrv_snapshot_dump((fprintf_function)monitor_printf, mon, sn);
|
||||||
monitor_printf(mon, "\n");
|
monitor_printf(mon, "\n");
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user