block/vdi: Don't ignore immediate read/write failures

This patch is similar to 171e3d6b99
which fixed qcow2:

Returning -EIO is far from optimal, but at least it's an error code.

Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Weil 2011-02-19 22:18:11 +01:00 committed by Kevin Wolf
parent cc015e9a5d
commit 40a892b78c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ static void vdi_aio_read_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
acb->hd_aiocb = bdrv_aio_readv(bs->file, offset, &acb->hd_qiov,
n_sectors, vdi_aio_read_cb, acb);
if (acb->hd_aiocb == NULL) {
ret = -EIO;
goto done;
}
}
@ -673,6 +674,7 @@ static void vdi_aio_write_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
acb->hd_aiocb = bdrv_aio_writev(bs->file, 0, &acb->hd_qiov, 1,
vdi_aio_write_cb, acb);
if (acb->hd_aiocb == NULL) {
ret = -EIO;
goto done;
}
return;
@ -702,6 +704,7 @@ static void vdi_aio_write_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
acb->hd_aiocb = bdrv_aio_writev(bs->file, offset, &acb->hd_qiov,
n_sectors, vdi_aio_write_cb, acb);
if (acb->hd_aiocb == NULL) {
ret = -EIO;
goto done;
}
return;
@ -752,6 +755,7 @@ static void vdi_aio_write_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
&acb->hd_qiov, s->block_sectors,
vdi_aio_write_cb, acb);
if (acb->hd_aiocb == NULL) {
ret = -EIO;
goto done;
}
} else {
@ -764,6 +768,7 @@ static void vdi_aio_write_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
acb->hd_aiocb = bdrv_aio_writev(bs->file, offset, &acb->hd_qiov,
n_sectors, vdi_aio_write_cb, acb);
if (acb->hd_aiocb == NULL) {
ret = -EIO;
goto done;
}
}