linux-user, ppc: fix clock_nanosleep() for linux-user-ppc

Our safe_clock_nanosleep() returns -1 and updates errno.

We don't need to update the CRF bit in syscall.c because it will
be updated in ppc/cpu_loop.c as the return value is negative.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200722174612.2917566-3-laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20200724064509.331-14-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Laurent Vivier 2020-07-24 07:45:06 +01:00 committed by Alex Bennée
parent 8ec68a0a87
commit 445883885a
1 changed files with 0 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -11840,13 +11840,6 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
host_to_target_timespec(arg4, &ts);
}
#if defined(TARGET_PPC)
/* clock_nanosleep is odd in that it returns positive errno values.
* On PPC, CR0 bit 3 should be set in such a situation. */
if (ret && ret != -TARGET_ERESTARTSYS) {
((CPUPPCState *)cpu_env)->crf[0] |= 1;
}
#endif
return ret;
}
#endif