target/i386: do not set unsupported VMX secondary execution controls
Commit048c95163b
("target/i386: work around KVM_GET_MSRS bug for secondary execution controls") added a workaround for KVM pre-dating commit 6defc591846d ("KVM: nVMX: include conditional controls in /dev/kvm KVM_GET_MSRS") which wasn't setting certain available controls. The workaround uses generic CPUID feature bits to set missing VMX controls. It was found that in some cases it is possible to observe hosts which have certain CPUID features but lack the corresponding VMX control. In particular, it was reported that Azure VMs have RDSEED but lack VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDSEED_EXITING; attempts to enable this feature bit result in QEMU abort. Resolve the issue but not applying the workaround when we don't have to. As there is no good way to find out if KVM has the fix itself, use 95c5c7c77c ("KVM: nVMX: list VMX MSRs in KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST") instead as these [are supposed to] come together. Fixes:048c95163b
("target/i386: work around KVM_GET_MSRS bug for secondary execution controls") Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200331162752.1209928-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f602d047ac
commit
4a910e1f6a
@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static bool has_msr_arch_capabs;
|
||||
static bool has_msr_core_capabs;
|
||||
static bool has_msr_vmx_vmfunc;
|
||||
static bool has_msr_ucode_rev;
|
||||
static bool has_msr_vmx_procbased_ctls2;
|
||||
|
||||
static uint32_t has_architectural_pmu_version;
|
||||
static uint32_t num_architectural_pmu_gp_counters;
|
||||
@ -490,21 +491,28 @@ uint64_t kvm_arch_get_supported_msr_feature(KVMState *s, uint32_t index)
|
||||
value = msr_data.entries[0].data;
|
||||
switch (index) {
|
||||
case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2:
|
||||
/* KVM forgot to add these bits for some time, do this ourselves. */
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xD, 1, R_ECX) & CPUID_XSAVE_XSAVES) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 1, 0, R_ECX) & CPUID_EXT_RDRAND) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDRAND_EXITING << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 7, 0, R_EBX) & CPUID_7_0_EBX_INVPCID) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 7, 0, R_EBX) & CPUID_7_0_EBX_RDSEED) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDSEED_EXITING << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000001, 0, R_EDX) & CPUID_EXT2_RDTSCP) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDTSCP << 32;
|
||||
if (!has_msr_vmx_procbased_ctls2) {
|
||||
/* KVM forgot to add these bits for some time, do this ourselves. */
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0xD, 1, R_ECX) &
|
||||
CPUID_XSAVE_XSAVES) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 1, 0, R_ECX) &
|
||||
CPUID_EXT_RDRAND) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDRAND_EXITING << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 7, 0, R_EBX) &
|
||||
CPUID_7_0_EBX_INVPCID) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 7, 0, R_EBX) &
|
||||
CPUID_7_0_EBX_RDSEED) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDSEED_EXITING << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, 0x80000001, 0, R_EDX) &
|
||||
CPUID_EXT2_RDTSCP) {
|
||||
value |= (uint64_t)VMX_SECONDARY_EXEC_RDTSCP << 32;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS:
|
||||
@ -2060,6 +2068,9 @@ static int kvm_get_supported_msrs(KVMState *s)
|
||||
case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
|
||||
has_msr_ucode_rev = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2:
|
||||
has_msr_vmx_procbased_ctls2 = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user