coroutine-lock: do not touch coroutine after another one has been entered
Submission of requests on linux aio is a bit tricky and can lead to requests completions on submission path:44713c9e85
("linux-aio: Handle io_submit() failure gracefully")0ed93d84ed
("linux-aio: process completions from ioq_submit()") That means that any coroutine which has been yielded in order to wait for completion can be resumed from submission path and be eventually terminated (freed). The following use-after-free crash was observed when IO throttling was enabled: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7f5813dff700 (LWP 56417)] virtqueue_unmap_sg (elem=0x7f5804009a30, len=1, vq=<optimized out>) at virtio.c:252 (gdb) bt #0 virtqueue_unmap_sg (elem=0x7f5804009a30, len=1, vq=<optimized out>) at virtio.c:252 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ remember the address #1 virtqueue_fill (vq=0x5598b20d21b0, elem=0x7f5804009a30, len=1, idx=0) at virtio.c:282 #2 virtqueue_push (vq=0x5598b20d21b0, elem=elem@entry=0x7f5804009a30, len=<optimized out>) at virtio.c:308 #3 virtio_blk_req_complete (req=req@entry=0x7f5804009a30, status=status@entry=0 '\000') at virtio-blk.c:61 #4 virtio_blk_rw_complete (opaque=<optimized out>, ret=0) at virtio-blk.c:126 #5 blk_aio_complete (acb=0x7f58040068d0) at block-backend.c:923 #6 coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, i1=<optimized out>) at coroutine-ucontext.c:78 (gdb) p * elem $8 = {index = 77, out_num = 2, in_num = 1, in_addr = 0x7f5804009ad8, out_addr = 0x7f5804009ae0, in_sg = 0x0, out_sg = 0x7f5804009a50} ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 'in_sg' and 'out_sg' are invalid. e.g. it is impossible that 'in_sg' is zero, instead its value must be equal to: (gdb) p/x 0x7f5804009ad8 + sizeof(elem->in_addr[0]) + 2 * sizeof(elem->out_addr[0]) $26 = 0x7f5804009af0 Seems 'elem' was corrupted. Meanwhile another thread raised an abort: Thread 12 (Thread 0x7f57f2ffd700 (LWP 56426)): #0 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5804009af0) at qemu-coroutine.c:113 #3 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f5804009a30) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #4 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5804009a30) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ WTF?? this is equal to elem from crashed thread #5 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f57e7f16ae0) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #6 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f57e7f16ae0) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #7 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f5807e112a0) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #8 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5807e112a0) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #9 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f5807f17820) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #10 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5807f17820) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #11 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f57e7f18e10) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #12 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f57e7f18e10) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #13 qemu_co_enter_next (queue=queue@entry=0x5598b1e742d0) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:106 #14 timer_cb (blk=0x5598b1e74280, is_write=<optimized out>) at throttle-groups.c:419 Crash can be explained by access of 'co' object from the loop inside qemu_co_queue_run_restart(): while ((next = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&co->co_queue_wakeup))) { QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&co->co_queue_wakeup, co_queue_next); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ on each iteration 'co' is accessed, but 'co' can be already freed qemu_coroutine_enter(next); } When 'next' coroutine is resumed (entered) it can in its turn resume 'co', and eventually free it. That's why we see 'co' (which was freed) has the same address as 'elem' from the first backtrace. The fix is obvious: use temporary queue and do not touch coroutine after first qemu_coroutine_enter() is invoked. The issue is quite rare and happens every ~12 hours on very high IO and CPU load (building linux kernel with -j512 inside guest) when IO throttling is enabled. With the fix applied guest is running ~35 hours and is still alive so far. Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170601160847.23720-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a586d2f0b
commit
528f449f59
@ -77,10 +77,25 @@ void coroutine_fn qemu_co_queue_wait(CoQueue *queue, CoMutex *mutex)
|
||||
void qemu_co_queue_run_restart(Coroutine *co)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Coroutine *next;
|
||||
QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, Coroutine) tmp_queue_wakeup =
|
||||
QSIMPLEQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(tmp_queue_wakeup);
|
||||
|
||||
trace_qemu_co_queue_run_restart(co);
|
||||
while ((next = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&co->co_queue_wakeup))) {
|
||||
QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&co->co_queue_wakeup, co_queue_next);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Because "co" has yielded, any coroutine that we wakeup can resume it.
|
||||
* If this happens and "co" terminates, co->co_queue_wakeup becomes
|
||||
* invalid memory. Therefore, use a temporary queue and do not touch
|
||||
* the "co" coroutine as soon as you enter another one.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In its turn resumed "co" can pupulate "co_queue_wakeup" queue with
|
||||
* new coroutines to be woken up. The caller, who has resumed "co",
|
||||
* will be responsible for traversing the same queue, which may cause
|
||||
* a different wakeup order but not any missing wakeups.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
QSIMPLEQ_CONCAT(&tmp_queue_wakeup, &co->co_queue_wakeup);
|
||||
|
||||
while ((next = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&tmp_queue_wakeup))) {
|
||||
QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&tmp_queue_wakeup, co_queue_next);
|
||||
qemu_coroutine_enter(next);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -126,6 +126,11 @@ void qemu_aio_coroutine_enter(AioContext *ctx, Coroutine *co)
|
||||
|
||||
qemu_co_queue_run_restart(co);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Beware, if ret == COROUTINE_YIELD and qemu_co_queue_run_restart()
|
||||
* has started any other coroutine, "co" might have been reentered
|
||||
* and even freed by now! So be careful and do not touch it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
switch (ret) {
|
||||
case COROUTINE_YIELD:
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user