memory: move bitmap synchronization to its own function

We want to have all the functions that handle directly the dirty
bitmap near.  We will change it later.

Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Juan Quintela 2013-11-05 15:52:54 +01:00
parent c9dd46fc0d
commit 5ff7fb77b3
2 changed files with 33 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@ -79,6 +79,37 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start,
xen_modified_memory(start, length);
}
static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_lebitmap(unsigned long *bitmap,
ram_addr_t start,
ram_addr_t pages)
{
unsigned int i, j;
unsigned long page_number, c;
hwaddr addr;
ram_addr_t ram_addr;
unsigned int len = (pages + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) / HOST_LONG_BITS;
unsigned long hpratio = getpagesize() / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
/*
* bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...)
* especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
*/
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (bitmap[i] != 0) {
c = leul_to_cpu(bitmap[i]);
do {
j = ffsl(c) - 1;
c &= ~(1ul << j);
page_number = (i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j) * hpratio;
addr = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
ram_addr = start + addr;
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr,
TARGET_PAGE_SIZE * hpratio);
} while (c != 0);
}
}
}
static inline void cpu_physical_memory_clear_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start,
ram_addr_t length,
unsigned client)

View File

@ -380,33 +380,10 @@ static int kvm_set_migration_log(int enable)
static int kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(MemoryRegionSection *section,
unsigned long *bitmap)
{
unsigned int i, j;
unsigned long page_number, c;
hwaddr addr;
ram_addr_t start = section->offset_within_region + section->mr->ram_addr;
ram_addr_t ram_addr;
unsigned int pages = int128_get64(section->size) / getpagesize();
unsigned int len = (pages + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) / HOST_LONG_BITS;
unsigned long hpratio = getpagesize() / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
ram_addr_t pages = int128_get64(section->size) / getpagesize();
/*
* bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...)
* especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
*/
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (bitmap[i] != 0) {
c = leul_to_cpu(bitmap[i]);
do {
j = ffsl(c) - 1;
c &= ~(1ul << j);
page_number = (i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j) * hpratio;
addr = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
ram_addr = start + addr;
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr,
TARGET_PAGE_SIZE * hpratio);
} while (c != 0);
}
}
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_lebitmap(bitmap, start, pages);
return 0;
}