qemu-thread-win32: cleanup, fix, document QemuEvent

QemuEvent is currently broken on ARM due to missing memory barriers
after qatomic_*().  Apart from adding the memory barrier, a closer look
reveals some unpaired memory barriers that are not really needed and
complicated the functions unnecessarily.  Also, it is relying on
a memory barrier in ResetEvent(); the barrier _ought_ to be there
but there is really no documentation about it, so make it explicit.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paolo Bonzini 2023-03-02 11:22:50 +01:00
parent 9586a1329f
commit 6c5df4b48f

View File

@ -272,12 +272,20 @@ void qemu_event_destroy(QemuEvent *ev)
void qemu_event_set(QemuEvent *ev)
{
assert(ev->initialized);
/* qemu_event_set has release semantics, but because it *loads*
/*
* Pairs with both qemu_event_reset() and qemu_event_wait().
*
* qemu_event_set has release semantics, but because it *loads*
* ev->value we need a full memory barrier here.
*/
smp_mb();
if (qatomic_read(&ev->value) != EV_SET) {
if (qatomic_xchg(&ev->value, EV_SET) == EV_BUSY) {
int old = qatomic_xchg(&ev->value, EV_SET);
/* Pairs with memory barrier after ResetEvent. */
smp_mb__after_rmw();
if (old == EV_BUSY) {
/* There were waiters, wake them up. */
SetEvent(ev->event);
}
@ -286,17 +294,19 @@ void qemu_event_set(QemuEvent *ev)
void qemu_event_reset(QemuEvent *ev)
{
unsigned value;
assert(ev->initialized);
value = qatomic_read(&ev->value);
smp_mb_acquire();
if (value == EV_SET) {
/* If there was a concurrent reset (or even reset+wait),
* do nothing. Otherwise change EV_SET->EV_FREE.
*/
qatomic_or(&ev->value, EV_FREE);
}
/*
* If there was a concurrent reset (or even reset+wait),
* do nothing. Otherwise change EV_SET->EV_FREE.
*/
qatomic_or(&ev->value, EV_FREE);
/*
* Order reset before checking the condition in the caller.
* Pairs with the first memory barrier in qemu_event_set().
*/
smp_mb__after_rmw();
}
void qemu_event_wait(QemuEvent *ev)
@ -304,29 +314,49 @@ void qemu_event_wait(QemuEvent *ev)
unsigned value;
assert(ev->initialized);
value = qatomic_read(&ev->value);
smp_mb_acquire();
/*
* qemu_event_wait must synchronize with qemu_event_set even if it does
* not go down the slow path, so this load-acquire is needed that
* synchronizes with the first memory barrier in qemu_event_set().
*
* If we do go down the slow path, there is no requirement at all: we
* might miss a qemu_event_set() here but ultimately the memory barrier in
* qemu_futex_wait() will ensure the check is done correctly.
*/
value = qatomic_load_acquire(&ev->value);
if (value != EV_SET) {
if (value == EV_FREE) {
/* qemu_event_set is not yet going to call SetEvent, but we are
* going to do another check for EV_SET below when setting EV_BUSY.
* At that point it is safe to call WaitForSingleObject.
/*
* Here the underlying kernel event is reset, but qemu_event_set is
* not yet going to call SetEvent. However, there will be another
* check for EV_SET below when setting EV_BUSY. At that point it
* is safe to call WaitForSingleObject.
*/
ResetEvent(ev->event);
/* Tell qemu_event_set that there are waiters. No need to retry
* because there cannot be a concurrent busy->free transition.
* After the CAS, the event will be either set or busy.
/*
* It is not clear whether ResetEvent provides this barrier; kernel
* APIs (KeResetEvent/KeClearEvent) do not. Better safe than sorry!
*/
smp_mb();
/*
* Leave the event reset and tell qemu_event_set that there are
* waiters. No need to retry, because there cannot be a concurrent
* busy->free transition. After the CAS, the event will be either
* set or busy.
*/
if (qatomic_cmpxchg(&ev->value, EV_FREE, EV_BUSY) == EV_SET) {
value = EV_SET;
} else {
value = EV_BUSY;
return;
}
}
if (value == EV_BUSY) {
WaitForSingleObject(ev->event, INFINITE);
}
/*
* ev->value is now EV_BUSY. Since we didn't observe EV_SET,
* qemu_event_set() must observe EV_BUSY and call SetEvent().
*/
WaitForSingleObject(ev->event, INFINITE);
}
}