hw/arm: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference counting

As explained in commit aff39be0ed97:

  Both functions, object_initialize() and object_property_add_child()
  increase the reference counter of the new object, so one of the
  references has to be dropped afterwards to get the reference
  counting right. Otherwise the child object will not be properly
  cleaned up when the parent gets destroyed.
  Thus let's use now object_initialize_child() instead to get the
  reference counting here right.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190823143249.8096-3-philmd@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-08-23 16:32:45 +02:00 committed by Peter Maydell
parent 8a863c8120
commit 7840938e25
3 changed files with 16 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ static void mcimx7d_sabre_init(MachineState *machine)
{
static struct arm_boot_info boot_info;
MCIMX7Sabre *s = g_new0(MCIMX7Sabre, 1);
Object *soc;
int i;
if (machine->ram_size > FSL_IMX7_MMDC_SIZE) {
@ -49,10 +48,10 @@ static void mcimx7d_sabre_init(MachineState *machine)
.nb_cpus = machine->smp.cpus,
};
object_initialize(&s->soc, sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_FSL_IMX7);
soc = OBJECT(&s->soc);
object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", soc, &error_fatal);
object_property_set_bool(soc, true, "realized", &error_fatal);
object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc",
&s->soc, sizeof(s->soc),
TYPE_FSL_IMX7, &error_fatal, NULL);
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->soc), true, "realized", &error_fatal);
memory_region_allocate_system_memory(&s->ram, NULL, "mcimx7d-sabre.ram",
machine->ram_size);

View File

@ -427,10 +427,10 @@ static void mps2tz_common_init(MachineState *machine)
/* The sec_resp_cfg output from the IoTKit must be split into multiple
* lines, one for each of the PPCs we create here, plus one per MSC.
*/
object_initialize(&mms->sec_resp_splitter, sizeof(mms->sec_resp_splitter),
TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ);
object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "sec-resp-splitter",
OBJECT(&mms->sec_resp_splitter), &error_abort);
object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "sec-resp-splitter",
&mms->sec_resp_splitter,
sizeof(mms->sec_resp_splitter),
TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ, &error_abort, NULL);
object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&mms->sec_resp_splitter),
ARRAY_SIZE(mms->ppc) + ARRAY_SIZE(mms->msc),
"num-lines", &error_fatal);
@ -465,10 +465,9 @@ static void mps2tz_common_init(MachineState *machine)
* Tx, Rx and "combined" IRQs are sent to the NVIC separately.
* Create the OR gate for this.
*/
object_initialize(&mms->uart_irq_orgate, sizeof(mms->uart_irq_orgate),
TYPE_OR_IRQ);
object_property_add_child(OBJECT(mms), "uart-irq-orgate",
OBJECT(&mms->uart_irq_orgate), &error_abort);
object_initialize_child(OBJECT(mms), "uart-irq-orgate",
&mms->uart_irq_orgate, sizeof(mms->uart_irq_orgate),
TYPE_OR_IRQ, &error_abort, NULL);
object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&mms->uart_irq_orgate), 10, "num-lines",
&error_fatal);
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&mms->uart_irq_orgate), true,

View File

@ -424,10 +424,11 @@ static void musca_init(MachineState *machine)
* The sec_resp_cfg output from the SSE-200 must be split into multiple
* lines, one for each of the PPCs we create here.
*/
object_initialize(&mms->sec_resp_splitter, sizeof(mms->sec_resp_splitter),
TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ);
object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "sec-resp-splitter",
OBJECT(&mms->sec_resp_splitter), &error_fatal);
object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "sec-resp-splitter",
&mms->sec_resp_splitter,
sizeof(mms->sec_resp_splitter),
TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ, &error_fatal, NULL);
object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&mms->sec_resp_splitter),
ARRAY_SIZE(mms->ppc), "num-lines", &error_fatal);
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&mms->sec_resp_splitter), true,