block/io: clear BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag after recursing in bdrv_co_block_status
Using fleecing backup like in [0] on a qcow2 image (with metadata preallocation) can lead to the following assertion failure: > bdrv_co_do_block_status: Assertion `!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO)' failed. In the reproducer [0], it happens because the BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag will be set by the qcow2 driver, so the caller will recursively check the file child. Then the BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO set too. Later up the call chain, in bdrv_co_do_block_status() for the snapshot-access driver, the assertion failure will happen, because both flags are set. To fix it, clear the recurse flag after the recursive check was done. In detail: > #0 qcow2_co_block_status Returns 0x45 = BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID. > #1 bdrv_co_do_block_status Because of the data flag, bdrv_co_do_block_status() will now also set BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED. Because of the recurse flag, bdrv_co_do_block_status() for the bdrv_file child will be called, which returns 0x16 = BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO. Now the return value inherits the zero flag. Returns 0x57 = BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO. > #2 bdrv_co_common_block_status_above > #3 bdrv_co_block_status_above > #4 bdrv_co_block_status > #5 cbw_co_snapshot_block_status > #6 bdrv_co_snapshot_block_status > #7 snapshot_access_co_block_status > #8 bdrv_co_do_block_status Return value is propagated all the way up to here, where the assertion failure happens, because BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE and BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO are both set. > #9 bdrv_co_common_block_status_above > #10 bdrv_co_block_status_above > #11 block_copy_block_status > #12 block_copy_dirty_clusters > #13 block_copy_common > #14 block_copy_async_co_entry > #15 coroutine_trampoline [0]: > #!/bin/bash > rm /tmp/disk.qcow2 > ./qemu-img create /tmp/disk.qcow2 -o preallocation=metadata -f qcow2 1G > ./qemu-img create /tmp/fleecing.qcow2 -f qcow2 1G > ./qemu-img create /tmp/backup.qcow2 -f qcow2 1G > ./qemu-system-x86_64 --qmp stdio \ > --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node0,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/disk.qcow2 \ > --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node1,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/fleecing.qcow2 \ > --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node2,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/backup.qcow2 \ > <<EOF > {"execute": "qmp_capabilities"} > {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "copy-before-write", "file": "node0", "target": "node1", "node-name": "node3" } } > {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "snapshot-access", "file": "node3", "node-name": "snap0" } } > {"execute": "blockdev-backup", "arguments": { "device": "snap0", "target": "node1", "sync": "full", "job-id": "backup0" } } > EOF Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Message-id: 20240116154839.401030-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9945ccda0
commit
8a9be79924
10
block/io.c
10
block/io.c
@ -2584,6 +2584,16 @@ bdrv_co_do_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, bool want_zero,
|
||||
ret |= (ret2 & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now that the recursive search was done, clear the flag. Otherwise,
|
||||
* with more complicated block graphs like snapshot-access ->
|
||||
* copy-before-write -> qcow2, where the return value will be propagated
|
||||
* further up to a parent bdrv_co_do_block_status() call, both the
|
||||
* BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE and BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO flags would be set, which is
|
||||
* not allowed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret &= ~BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user