From 9c6f933e71ccfde036d7e19c1ddc2b1a82cc45c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 16:14:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: report correct PRIbits field in ICV_CTLR_EL1 As noted in the comment, the PRIbits field in ICV_CTLR_EL1 is supposed to match the ICH_VTR_EL2 PRIbits setting; that is, it is the virtual priority bit setting, not the physical priority bit setting. (For QEMU currently we always implement 8 bits of physical priority, so the PRIbits field was previously 7, since it is defined to be "priority bits - 1".) Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Message-id: 20220512151457.3899052-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org Message-id: 20220506162129.2896966-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c index df2f858356..ebf269b73a 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static uint64_t icv_ctlr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) * should match the ones reported in ich_vtr_read(). */ value = ICC_CTLR_EL1_A3V | (1 << ICC_CTLR_EL1_IDBITS_SHIFT) | - (7 << ICC_CTLR_EL1_PRIBITS_SHIFT); + ((cs->vpribits - 1) << ICC_CTLR_EL1_PRIBITS_SHIFT); if (cs->ich_vmcr_el2 & ICH_VMCR_EL2_VEOIM) { value |= ICC_CTLR_EL1_EOIMODE;