target-arm/translate.c: Use get_mem_index() for SRS memory accesses
The SRS instruction was using a hardcoded 0 for the memory accesses. This happens to be OK since the SRS instruction is UNPREDICTABLE in User and System modes, but is awkward if we want to rearrange the MMU index uses. Switch to using get_mem_index() like all the other accesses. Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 1400980132-25949-4-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
a99caa48d8
commit
c119779543
@ -7338,11 +7338,11 @@ static void gen_srs(DisasContext *s,
|
||||
}
|
||||
tcg_gen_addi_i32(addr, addr, offset);
|
||||
tmp = load_reg(s, 14);
|
||||
gen_aa32_st32(tmp, addr, 0);
|
||||
gen_aa32_st32(tmp, addr, get_mem_index(s));
|
||||
tcg_temp_free_i32(tmp);
|
||||
tmp = load_cpu_field(spsr);
|
||||
tcg_gen_addi_i32(addr, addr, 4);
|
||||
gen_aa32_st32(tmp, addr, 0);
|
||||
gen_aa32_st32(tmp, addr, get_mem_index(s));
|
||||
tcg_temp_free_i32(tmp);
|
||||
if (writeback) {
|
||||
switch (amode) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user