util/ioc.c: try to reassure Coverity about qemu_iovec_init_extended
Make it more obvious, that filling qiov corresponds to qiov allocation, which in turn corresponds to total_niov calculation, based on mid_niov (not mid_len). Still add an assertion to show that there should be no difference. [Added mingw "error: 'mid_iov' may be used uninitialized in this function" compiler error fix suggested by Vladimir. --Stefan] Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1405302) Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20190910090310.14032-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20190910090310.14032-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> fixup! util/ioc.c: try to reassure Coverity about qemu_iovec_init_extended
This commit is contained in:
parent
560009f2c8
commit
d38d6de2a1
@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ void qemu_iovec_init_extended(
|
||||
{
|
||||
size_t mid_head, mid_tail;
|
||||
int total_niov, mid_niov = 0;
|
||||
struct iovec *p, *mid_iov;
|
||||
struct iovec *p, *mid_iov = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mid_len) {
|
||||
mid_iov = qiov_slice(mid_qiov, mid_offset, mid_len,
|
||||
@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ void qemu_iovec_init_extended(
|
||||
p++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (mid_len) {
|
||||
assert(!mid_niov == !mid_len);
|
||||
if (mid_niov) {
|
||||
memcpy(p, mid_iov, mid_niov * sizeof(*p));
|
||||
p[0].iov_base = (uint8_t *)p[0].iov_base + mid_head;
|
||||
p[0].iov_len -= mid_head;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user