From d52e1a0e967a532867149c2d95c2dd664ca22fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 16:30:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] blockdev: Consistently use snapshot_node_name in external_snapshot_prepare() In the function external_snapshot_prepare() we have a BlockdevSnapshotSync struct, which has the usual combination of has_snapshot_node_name and snapshot_node_name fields for an optional field. We set up a local variable const char *snapshot_node_name = s->has_snapshot_node_name ? s->snapshot_node_name : NULL; and then mostly use "if (!snapshot_node_name)" for checking whether we have a snapshot node name. The exception is that in one place we check s->has_snapshot_node_name instead. This confuses Coverity (CID 1396473), which thinks it might be possible to get here with s->has_snapshot_node_name true but snapshot_node_name NULL, and warns that the call to qdict_put_str() will segfault in that case. Make the code consistent and unconfuse Coverity by using the same check for this conditional that we do in the rest of the surrounding code. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- blockdev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c index 9310ff3e7c..81f95d920b 100644 --- a/blockdev.c +++ b/blockdev.c @@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@ static void external_snapshot_prepare(BlkActionState *common, } options = qdict_new(); - if (s->has_snapshot_node_name) { + if (snapshot_node_name) { qdict_put_str(options, "node-name", snapshot_node_name); } qdict_put_str(options, "driver", format);