qapi: Enforce union and alternate branch naming rules
Union branch names should use '-', not '_'. Enforce this. The only offenders are in tests/. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210323094025.3569441-29-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> [Commit message typo fixed]
This commit is contained in:
parent
407efbf9e7
commit
d83b47646e
@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ def check_union(expr, info):
|
||||
for (key, value) in members.items():
|
||||
source = "'data' member '%s'" % key
|
||||
if discriminator is None:
|
||||
check_name_lower(key, info, source, permit_underscore=True)
|
||||
check_name_lower(key, info, source)
|
||||
# else: name is in discriminator enum, which gets checked
|
||||
check_keys(value, info, source, ['type'], ['if'])
|
||||
check_if(value, info, source)
|
||||
@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ def check_alternate(expr, info):
|
||||
raise QAPISemError(info, "'data' must not be empty")
|
||||
for (key, value) in members.items():
|
||||
source = "'data' member '%s'" % key
|
||||
check_name_lower(key, info, source, permit_underscore=True)
|
||||
check_name_lower(key, info, source)
|
||||
check_keys(value, info, source, ['type'], ['if'])
|
||||
check_if(value, info, source)
|
||||
check_type(value['type'], info, source)
|
||||
|
@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
||||
alternate-clash.json: In alternate 'Alt1':
|
||||
alternate-clash.json:4: branch 'a_b' collides with branch 'a-b'
|
||||
alternate-clash.json:6: name of 'data' member 'a_b' must not use uppercase or '_'
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# Alternate branch name collision
|
||||
# Reject an alternate that would result in a collision in generated C
|
||||
# names (this would try to generate two union members named 'a_b').
|
||||
# Naming rules make collision impossible (even with the pragma). If
|
||||
# that wasn't the case, then we'd get a collision in generated C: two
|
||||
# union members a_b.
|
||||
{ 'pragma': { 'member-name-exceptions': [ 'Alt1' ] } }
|
||||
{ 'alternate': 'Alt1',
|
||||
'data': { 'a-b': 'bool', 'a_b': 'int' } }
|
||||
|
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
{ 'union': 'TestIfUnion', 'data':
|
||||
{ 'foo': 'TestStruct',
|
||||
'union_bar': { 'type': 'str', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_UNION_BAR)'} },
|
||||
'bar': { 'type': 'str', 'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_UNION_BAR)'} },
|
||||
'if': 'defined(TEST_IF_UNION) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT)' }
|
||||
|
||||
{ 'command': 'test-if-union-cmd',
|
||||
|
@ -309,14 +309,14 @@ object q_obj_TestStruct-wrapper
|
||||
member data: TestStruct optional=False
|
||||
enum TestIfUnionKind
|
||||
member foo
|
||||
member union_bar
|
||||
member bar
|
||||
if ['defined(TEST_IF_UNION_BAR)']
|
||||
if ['defined(TEST_IF_UNION) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT)']
|
||||
object TestIfUnion
|
||||
member type: TestIfUnionKind optional=False
|
||||
tag type
|
||||
case foo: q_obj_TestStruct-wrapper
|
||||
case union_bar: q_obj_str-wrapper
|
||||
case bar: q_obj_str-wrapper
|
||||
if ['defined(TEST_IF_UNION_BAR)']
|
||||
if ['defined(TEST_IF_UNION) && defined(TEST_IF_STRUCT)']
|
||||
object q_obj_test-if-union-cmd-arg
|
||||
|
@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
||||
union-clash-branches.json: In union 'TestUnion':
|
||||
union-clash-branches.json:4: branch 'a_b' collides with branch 'a-b'
|
||||
union-clash-branches.json:6: name of 'data' member 'a_b' must not use uppercase or '_'
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# Union branch name collision
|
||||
# Reject a union that would result in a collision in generated C names (this
|
||||
# would try to generate two members 'a_b').
|
||||
# Naming rules make collision impossible (even with the pragma). If
|
||||
# that wasn't the case, then we'd get collisions in generated C: two
|
||||
# union members a_b, and two enum members TEST_UNION_A_B.
|
||||
{ 'pragma': { 'member-name-exceptions': [ 'TestUnion' ] } }
|
||||
{ 'union': 'TestUnion',
|
||||
'data': { 'a-b': 'int', 'a_b': 'str' } }
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user