tests/block-job-txn: Don't start block job before adding to txn

Previously, before test_block_job_start returns, the job can already
complete, as a result, the transactional state of other jobs added to
the same txn later cannot be handled correctly.

Move the block_job_start() calls to callers after
block_job_txn_add_job() calls.

Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Fam Zheng 2017-04-07 08:55:13 +08:00
parent aabf591007
commit d90fce9446

View File

@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static BlockJob *test_block_job_start(unsigned int iterations,
s->result = result;
data->job = s;
data->result = result;
block_job_start(&s->common);
return &s->common;
}
@ -123,6 +122,7 @@ static void test_single_job(int expected)
txn = block_job_txn_new();
job = test_block_job_start(1, true, expected, &result);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job);
block_job_start(job);
if (expected == -ECANCELED) {
block_job_cancel(job);
@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ static void test_pair_jobs(int expected1, int expected2)
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job1);
job2 = test_block_job_start(2, true, expected2, &result2);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job2);
block_job_start(job1);
block_job_start(job2);
if (expected1 == -ECANCELED) {
block_job_cancel(job1);
@ -223,6 +225,8 @@ static void test_pair_jobs_fail_cancel_race(void)
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job1);
job2 = test_block_job_start(2, false, 0, &result2);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job2);
block_job_start(job1);
block_job_start(job2);
block_job_cancel(job1);