kvm/msi: do explicit commit when adding msi routes
We invoke the kvm_irqchip_commit_routes() for each addition to MSI route table, which is not efficient if we are adding lots of routes in some cases. This patch lets callers invoke the kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(), so the callers can decide how to optimize. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-11/msg00967.html Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com> Message-Id: <20220222141116.2091-3-longpeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9568690868
commit
def4c5570c
@ -1961,10 +1961,11 @@ int kvm_irqchip_send_msi(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
|
||||
return kvm_set_irq(s, route->kroute.gsi, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMRouteChange *c, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute = {};
|
||||
int virq;
|
||||
KVMState *s = c->s;
|
||||
MSIMessage msg = {0, 0};
|
||||
|
||||
if (pci_available && dev) {
|
||||
@ -2004,7 +2005,7 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
|
||||
kvm_add_routing_entry(s, &kroute);
|
||||
kvm_arch_add_msi_route_post(&kroute, vector, dev);
|
||||
kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(s);
|
||||
c->changes++;
|
||||
|
||||
return virq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2162,7 +2163,7 @@ int kvm_irqchip_send_msi(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
|
||||
abort();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMRouteChange *c, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return -ENOSYS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int kvm_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMRouteChange *c, int vector, PCIDevice *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return -ENOSYS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -424,16 +424,19 @@ static void ivshmem_add_kvm_msi_virq(IVShmemState *s, int vector,
|
||||
Error **errp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
PCIDevice *pdev = PCI_DEVICE(s);
|
||||
KVMRouteChange c;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("ivshmem_add_kvm_msi_virq vector:%d\n", vector);
|
||||
assert(!s->msi_vectors[vector].pdev);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, vector, pdev);
|
||||
c = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(kvm_state);
|
||||
ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(&c, vector, pdev);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
error_setg(errp, "kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route failed");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&c);
|
||||
|
||||
s->msi_vectors[vector].virq = ret;
|
||||
s->msi_vectors[vector].pdev = pdev;
|
||||
|
@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static int vfio_enable_vectors(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, bool msix)
|
||||
static void vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, VFIOMSIVector *vector,
|
||||
int vector_n, bool msix)
|
||||
{
|
||||
KVMRouteChange c;
|
||||
int virq;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((msix && vdev->no_kvm_msix) || (!msix && vdev->no_kvm_msi)) {
|
||||
@ -422,11 +423,13 @@ static void vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, VFIOMSIVector *vector,
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, vector_n, &vdev->pdev);
|
||||
c = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(kvm_state);
|
||||
virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(&c, vector_n, &vdev->pdev);
|
||||
if (virq < 0) {
|
||||
event_notifier_cleanup(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&c);
|
||||
|
||||
if (kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi(kvm_state, &vector->kvm_interrupt,
|
||||
NULL, virq) < 0) {
|
||||
|
@ -683,10 +683,12 @@ static int kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (irqfd->users == 0) {
|
||||
ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, vector, &proxy->pci_dev);
|
||||
KVMRouteChange c = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(kvm_state);
|
||||
ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(&c, vector, &proxy->pci_dev);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&c);
|
||||
irqfd->virq = ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
irqfd->users++;
|
||||
|
@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ void kvm_init_cpu_signals(CPUState *cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route - Add MSI route for specific vector
|
||||
* @s: KVM state
|
||||
* @c: KVMRouteChange instance.
|
||||
* @vector: which vector to add. This can be either MSI/MSIX
|
||||
* vector. The function will automatically detect whether
|
||||
* MSI/MSIX is enabled, and fetch corresponding MSI
|
||||
@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ void kvm_init_cpu_signals(CPUState *cpu);
|
||||
* as @NULL, an empty MSI message will be inited.
|
||||
* @return: virq (>=0) when success, errno (<0) when failed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, int vector, PCIDevice *dev);
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMRouteChange *c, int vector, PCIDevice *dev);
|
||||
int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg,
|
||||
PCIDevice *dev);
|
||||
void kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(KVMState *s);
|
||||
|
@ -4940,16 +4940,18 @@ void kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
|
||||
kvm_gsi_routing_allowed = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (kvm_irqchip_is_split()) {
|
||||
KVMRouteChange c = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(s);
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the ioapic is in QEMU and the lapics are in KVM, reserve
|
||||
MSI routes for signaling interrupts to the local apics. */
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
|
||||
if (kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(s, 0, NULL) < 0) {
|
||||
if (kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(&c, 0, NULL) < 0) {
|
||||
error_report("Could not enable split IRQ mode.");
|
||||
exit(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user