hw/rdma: Deprecate the pvrdma device and the rdma subsystem
This subsystem is said to be in a bad shape (see e.g. [1], [2] and [3]), and nobody seems to feel responsible to pick up patches for this and send them via a pull request. For example there is a patch for a CVE-worthy bug posted more than half a year ago [4] which has never been merged. Thus let's mark it as deprecated and finally remove it unless somebody steps up and improves the code quality and adds proper regression tests. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230918144206.560120-1-armbru@redhat.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/ZQnojJOqoFu73995@redhat.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/1054981c-e8ae-c676-3b04-eeb030e11f65@tls.msk.ru/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230301142926.18686-1-yuval.shaia.ml@gmail.com/ Message-ID: <20230927133019.228495-1-thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
85fc35afa9
commit
e9a54265f5
@ -3843,7 +3843,7 @@ F: docs/block-replication.txt
|
||||
PVRDMA
|
||||
M: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia.ml@gmail.com>
|
||||
M: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
|
||||
S: Maintained
|
||||
S: Odd Fixes
|
||||
F: hw/rdma/*
|
||||
F: hw/rdma/vmw/*
|
||||
F: docs/pvrdma.txt
|
||||
|
@ -327,6 +327,14 @@ QEMU's ``vhost`` feature, which would eliminate the high latency costs under
|
||||
which the 9p ``proxy`` backend currently suffers. However as of to date nobody
|
||||
has indicated plans for such kind of reimplementation unfortunately.
|
||||
|
||||
``-device pvrdma`` and the rdma subsystem (since 8.2)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
The pvrdma device and the whole rdma subsystem are in a bad shape and
|
||||
without active maintenance. The QEMU project intends to remove this
|
||||
device and subsystem from the code base in a future release without
|
||||
replacement unless somebody steps up and improves the situation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Block device options
|
||||
''''''''''''''''''''
|
||||
|
@ -615,6 +615,8 @@ static void pvrdma_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
|
||||
bool ram_shared = false;
|
||||
PCIDevice *func0;
|
||||
|
||||
warn_report_once("pvrdma is deprecated and will be removed in a future release");
|
||||
|
||||
rdma_info_report("Initializing device %s %x.%x", pdev->name,
|
||||
PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user