migration/block-dirty-bitmap: simplify dirty_bitmap_load_complete

bdrv_enable_dirty_bitmap_locked() call does nothing, as if we are in
postcopy, bitmap successor must be enabled, and reclaim operation will
enable the bitmap.

So, actually we need just call _reclaim_ in both if branches, and
making differences only to add an assertion seems not really good. The
logic becomes simple: on load complete we do reclaim and that's all.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200727194236.19551-14-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 2020-07-27 22:42:28 +03:00 committed by Eric Blake
parent 8949121644
commit f3045b9a82
1 changed files with 4 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -603,6 +603,10 @@ static void dirty_bitmap_load_complete(QEMUFile *f, DBMLoadState *s)
qemu_mutex_lock(&s->lock);
if (bdrv_dirty_bitmap_has_successor(s->bitmap)) {
bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap(s->bitmap, &error_abort);
}
for (item = s->enabled_bitmaps; item; item = g_slist_next(item)) {
LoadBitmapState *b = item->data;
@ -612,27 +616,6 @@ static void dirty_bitmap_load_complete(QEMUFile *f, DBMLoadState *s)
}
}
if (bdrv_dirty_bitmap_has_successor(s->bitmap)) {
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_lock(s->bitmap);
if (s->enabled_bitmaps == NULL) {
/* in postcopy */
bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap_locked(s->bitmap, &error_abort);
bdrv_enable_dirty_bitmap_locked(s->bitmap);
} else {
/* target not started, successor must be empty */
int64_t count = bdrv_get_dirty_count(s->bitmap);
BdrvDirtyBitmap *ret = bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap_locked(s->bitmap,
NULL);
/* bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap can fail only on no successor (it
* must be) or on merge fail, but merge can't fail when second
* bitmap is empty
*/
assert(ret == s->bitmap &&
count == bdrv_get_dirty_count(s->bitmap));
}
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_unlock(s->bitmap);
}
qemu_mutex_unlock(&s->lock);
}