seqlock: use atomic writes for the sequence
There is a data race if the sequence is written concurrently to the read. In C11 this has undefined behavior. Use atomic_set; the read side is already using atomic_read. Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20160930213106.20186-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
550276ae0a
commit
f96a8cc3c6
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline void seqlock_init(QemuSeqLock *sl)
|
||||
/* Lock out other writers and update the count. */
|
||||
static inline void seqlock_write_begin(QemuSeqLock *sl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
++sl->sequence;
|
||||
atomic_set(&sl->sequence, sl->sequence + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Write sequence before updating other fields. */
|
||||
smp_wmb();
|
||||
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline void seqlock_write_end(QemuSeqLock *sl)
|
||||
/* Write other fields before finalizing sequence. */
|
||||
smp_wmb();
|
||||
|
||||
++sl->sequence;
|
||||
atomic_set(&sl->sequence, sl->sequence + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned seqlock_read_begin(QemuSeqLock *sl)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user