Now permissions are updated as follows:
1. do graph modifications ignoring permissions
2. do permission update
(of course, we rollback [1] if [2] fails)
So, on stage [2] we can't say which users are "old" and which are
"new" and exist only since [1]. And current error message is a bit
outdated. Let's improve it, to make everything clean.
While being here, add also a comment and some good assertions.
iotests 283, 307, qsd-jobs outputs are updated.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210601075218.79249-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Split out no-perm part of bdrv_root_attach_child() into separate
transaction action. bdrv_root_attach_child() now moves to new
permission update paradigm: first update graph relations then update
permissions.
qsd-jobs test output updated. Seems now permission update goes in
another order. Still, the test comment say that we only want to check
that command doesn't crash, and it's still so.
Error message is a bit misleading as it looks like job was added first.
But actually in new paradigm of graph update we can't distinguish such
things. We should update the error message, but let's not do it now.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-19-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The job may or may not be ready before the 'quit' is issued. Whether it
is is irrelevant; for the purpose of the test, it only needs to still be
there. Filter the job status change and READY events from the output so
it becomes reliable.
Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210401132839.139939-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The image streaming block job restricts shared permissions of the nodes
it accesses. This can obviously fail when other users already got these
permissions. &error_abort is therefore wrong and can crash. Handle these
errors gracefully and just fail starting the block job.
Reported-by: Nini Gu <ngu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210309173451.45152-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_close_all() asserts that no jobs are running any more, so we need
to cancel all jobs first to avoid failing the assertion.
Fixes: b55a3c8860
Reported-by: Nini Gu <ngu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210309121814.31078-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Max Reitz
Kevin Wolf