Fill in the field in BlockLimits directly for host devices, and
copy it from there for the raw format.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230407153303.391121-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
At the protocol level, has_variable_length only needs to be true in the
very special case of host CD-ROM drives, so that they do not need an
explicit monitor command to read the new size when a disc is loaded
in the tray.
However, at the format level has_variable_length has to be true for all
raw blockdevs and for all filters, even though in practice the length
depends on the underlying file and thus will not change except in the
case of host CD-ROM drives.
As a first step towards computing an accurate value of has_variable_length,
add the value into the BlockLimits structure and initialize the field
from the BlockDriver.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230407153303.391121-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_register_buf() and bdrv_unregister_buf() need to hold a reader lock
for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_io_plug() and bdrv_co_io_unplug() need to hold a reader lock for
the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_copy_range() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
All callers are already GRAPH_RDLOCK, so just add the annotation and
remove assume_graph_lock().
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_sync() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pread*/pwrite*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotation to public functions yet.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pdiscard() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_ioctl() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_block_status() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_truncate() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.
For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
When a write request is converted into a write zeroes request by the
detect-zeroes= feature, it is no longer associated with an I/O buffer.
The BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF flag doesn't make sense without an I/O
buffer and must be cleared because bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() fails with
-EINVAL when it's set.
Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> bisected and diagnosed this QEMU 7.2
regression where writes containing zeroes to a blockdev with
discard=unmap,detect-zeroes=unmap fail.
Buglink: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1404
Fixes: e8b6535533 ("block: add BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF request flag")
Tested-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230207203719.242926-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Since these functions always run in coroutine context, adjust
their name to include "_co_", just like all other BlockDriver callbacks.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_debug_event() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper_mixed to move the actual function
into a coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In some places we are sure we are always running in a
coroutine, therefore it's useless to call the generated_co_wrapper,
instead call directly the _co_ function.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The name is not good, not the least because we are going to convert this
to a generated co_wrapper, which adds a _co infix after the first part
of the name.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_is_inserted() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.
Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
At the same time, add also blk_is_inserted as co_wrapper_mixed, since it
is called in both coroutine and non-coroutine contexts.
Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally c_w_mixed_bdrv_rdlock calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to
release the AioContext lock. Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in
every place it needs to be, we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED
and remove the AioContext lock.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_unplug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_unplug(), therefore make
blk_io_unplug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
BlockDriver->bdrv_io_plug is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.
The only caller of this function is blk_io_plug(), therefore make
blk_io_plug() a co_wrapper, so that we're always running in a coroutine
where the lock can be taken.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
In commit da0bd74434 we refactored bdrv_drain_all_begin() to pull out
the non-polling part into bdrv_drain_all_begin_nopoll(). This change
broke record-and-replay, because the "return early if replay enabled"
check is now in the sub-function bdrv_drain_all_begin_nopoll(), and
so it only causes us to return from that function, and not from the
calling bdrv_drain_all_begin().
Fix the regression by checking whether replay is enabled in both
functions.
The breakage and fix can be tested via 'make check-avocado': the
tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_X86_64.test_x86_64_pc
tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_AArch64.test_aarch64_virt
tests were both broken by this.
Fixes: da0bd74434 ("block: Factor out bdrv_drain_all_begin_nopoll()")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Message-id: 20221220174638.2156308-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The generated coroutine wrappers already take care to take the lock in
the non-coroutine path, and assume that the lock is already taken in the
coroutine path.
The only thing we need to do for the wrapped function is adding the
GRAPH_RDLOCK annotation. Doing so also allows us to mark the
corresponding callbacks in BlockDriver as GRAPH_RDLOCK_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-19-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Provide a separate function that just quiesces the users of a node to
prevent new requests from coming in, but without waiting for the already
in-flight I/O to complete.
This function can be used in contexts where polling is not allowed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_common_block_status_above() is a g_c_w, and it is being called by
many "wrapper" functions like bdrv_is_allocated(),
bdrv_is_allocated_above() and bdrv_block_status_above().
Because we want to eventually split the coroutine from non-coroutine
case in g_c_w, create duplicate wrappers that take care of directly
calling the same coroutine functions called in the g_c_w.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-2-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
All callers of bdrv_parent_drained_begin_single() pass poll=false now,
so we don't need the parameter any more.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-16-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In order to make sure that bdrv_replace_child_noperm() doesn't have to
poll any more, get rid of the bdrv_parent_drained_begin_single() call.
This is possible now because we can require that the parent is already
drained through the child in question when the function is called and we
don't call the parent drain callbacks more than once.
The additional drain calls needed in callers cause the test case to run
its code in the drain handler too early (bdrv_attach_child() drains
now), so modify it to only enable the code after the test setup has
completed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-15-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
The next patch adds a parent drain to bdrv_attach_child_common(), which
shouldn't be, but is currently called from coroutines in some cases (e.g.
.bdrv_co_create implementations generally open new nodes). Therefore,
the assertion that we're not in a coroutine doesn't hold true any more.
We could just remove the assertion because there is nothing in the
function that should be in conflict with running in a coroutine, but
just to be on the safe side, we can reverse the caller relationship
between bdrv_do_drained_begin() and bdrv_do_drained_begin_quiesce() so
that the latter also just drops out of coroutine context and we can
still be certain in the future that any drain code doesn't run in
coroutines.
As a nice side effect, the structure of bdrv_do_drained_begin() is now
symmetrical with bdrv_do_drained_end().
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-14-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
ignore_bds_parents is now ignored during drain_begin and drain_end, so
we can just remove it there. It is still a valid optimisation for
drain_all in bdrv_drained_poll(), so leave it around there.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-13-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We only need to call both the BlockDriver's callback and the parent
callbacks when going from undrained to drained or vice versa. A second
drain section doesn't make a difference for the driver or the parent,
they weren't supposed to send new requests before and after the second
drain.
One thing that gets in the way is the 'ignore_bds_parents' parameter in
bdrv_do_drained_begin_quiesce() and bdrv_do_drained_end(): It means that
bdrv_drain_all_begin() increases bs->quiesce_counter, but does not
quiesce the parent through BdrvChildClass callbacks. If an additional
drain section is started now, bs->quiesce_counter will be non-zero, but
we would still need to quiesce the parent through BdrvChildClass in
order to keep things consistent (and unquiesce it on the matching
bdrv_drained_end(), even though the counter would not reach 0 yet as
long as the bdrv_drain_all() section is still active).
Instead of keeping track of this, let's just get rid of the parameter.
It was introduced in commit 6cd5c9d7b2 as an optimisation so that
during bdrv_drain_all(), we wouldn't recursively drain all parents up to
the root for each node, resulting in quadratic complexity. As it happens,
calling the callbacks only once solves the same problem, so as of this
patch, we'll still have O(n) complexity and ignore_bds_parents is not
needed any more.
This patch only ignores the 'ignore_bds_parents' parameter. It will be
removed in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Subtree drains are not used any more. Remove them.
After this, BdrvChildClass.attach/detach() don't poll any more.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_drain_invoke() has now two entirely separate cases that share no
code any more and are selected depending on a bool parameter. Each case
has only one caller. Just inline the function.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-6-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
drained_end_counter is unused now, nobody changes its value any more. It
can be removed.
In cases where we had two almost identical functions that only differed
in whether the caller passes drained_end_counter, or whether they would
poll for a local drained_end_counter to reach 0, these become a single
function.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-5-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Polling during bdrv_drained_end() can be problematic (and in the future,
we may get cases for bdrv_drained_begin() where polling is forbidden,
and we don't care about already in-flight requests, but just want to
prevent new requests from arriving).
The .bdrv_drained_begin/end callbacks running in a coroutine is the only
reason why we have to do this polling, so make them non-coroutine
callbacks again. None of the callers actually yield any more.
This means that bdrv_drained_end() effectively doesn't poll any more,
even if AIO_WAIT_WHILE() loops are still there (their condition is false
from the beginning). This is generally not a problem, but in
test-bdrv-drain, some additional explicit aio_poll() calls need to be
added because the test case wants to verify the final state after BHs
have executed.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_parent_drained_{begin,end}_single() are supposed to operate on the
parent, not on the child, so they should not attempt to get the context
to poll from the child but the parent instead. BDRV_POLL_WHILE(c->bs)
does get the context from the child, so we should replace it with
AIO_WAIT_WHILE() on the parent's context instead.
This problem becomes apparent when bdrv_replace_child_noperm() invokes
bdrv_parent_drained_end_single() after removing a child from a subgraph
that is in an I/O thread. By the time bdrv_parent_drained_end_single()
is called, child->bs is NULL, and so BDRV_POLL_WHILE(c->bs, ...) will
poll the main loop instead of the I/O thread; but anything that
bdrv_parent_drained_end_single_no_poll() may have scheduled is going to
want to run in the I/O thread, but because we poll the main loop, the
I/O thread is never unpaused, and nothing is run, resulting in a
deadlock.
Closes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1215
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221107151321.211175-4-hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221013123711.620631-16-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221013123711.620631-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Registering an I/O buffer is only a performance optimization hint but it
is still necessary to return errors when it fails.
Later patches will need to detect errors when registering buffers but an
immediate advantage is that error_report() calls are no longer needed in
block driver .bdrv_register_buf() functions.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20221013185908.1297568-8-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Block drivers may optimize I/O requests accessing buffers previously
registered with bdrv_register_buf(). Checking whether all elements of a
request's QEMUIOVector are within previously registered buffers is
expensive, so we need a hint from the user to avoid costly checks.
Add a BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF request flag to indicate that all
QEMUIOVector elements in an I/O request are known to be within
previously registered buffers.
Always pass the flag through to driver read/write functions. There is
little harm in passing the flag to a driver that does not use it.
Passing the flag to drivers avoids changes across many block drivers.
Filter drivers would need to explicitly support the flag and pass
through to their children when the children support it. That's a lot of
code changes and it's hard to remember to do that everywhere, leading to
silent reduced performance when the flag is accidentally dropped.
The only problematic scenario with the approach in this patch is when a
driver passes the flag through to internal I/O requests that don't use
the same I/O buffer. In that case the hint may be set when it should
actually be clear. This is a rare case though so the risk is low.
Some drivers have assert(!flags), which no longer works when
BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF is passed in. These assertions aren't very
useful anyway since the functions are called almost exclusively by
bdrv_driver_preadv/pwritev() so if we get flags handling right there
then the assertion is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20221013185908.1297568-7-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
The only implementor of bdrv_register_buf() is block/nvme.c, where the
size is not needed when unregistering a buffer. This is because
util/vfio-helpers.c can look up mappings by address.
Future block drivers that implement bdrv_register_buf() may not be able
to do their job given only the buffer address. Add a size argument to
bdrv_unregister_buf().
Also document the assumptions about
bdrv_register_buf()/bdrv_unregister_buf() calls. The same <host, size>
values that were given to bdrv_register_buf() must be given to
bdrv_unregister_buf().
gcc 11.2.1 emits a spurious warning that img_bench()'s buf_size local
variable might be uninitialized, so it's necessary to silence the
compiler.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20221013185908.1297568-5-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Callers of coroutine_fn must be coroutine_fn themselves, or the call
must be within "if (qemu_in_coroutine())". Apply coroutine_fn to
functions where this holds.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220922084924.201610-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
[kwolf: Fixed up coding style]
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
There is only user of bdrv_qiov_is_aligned(), so move the alignment
function to there and make it static.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20220929200523.3218710-2-kbusch@meta.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Return codes of the following functions are never used in the code:
* bdrv_wait_serialising_requests_locked
* bdrv_wait_serialising_requests
* bdrv_make_request_serialising
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
CC: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
CC: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20220817083736.40981-3-den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Also convert bdrv_pwrite_sync() to being implemented using
generated_co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220609152744.3891847-9-afaria@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
