Currently the bitbang_i2c_init() function allocates a
bitbang_i2c_interface struct which it returns. This is unfortunate
because it means that if the function is used from a DeviceState
init method then the memory will be leaked by an "init then delete"
cycle, as used by the qmp/hmp commands that list device properties.
Since three out of four of the uses of this function are in
device init methods, switch the function to do an in-place
initialization of a struct that can be embedded in the
device state struct of the caller.
This fixes LeakSanitizer leak warnings that have appeared in the
patchew configuration (which only tries to run the sanitizers
for the x86_64-softmmu target) now that we use the bitbang-i2c
code in an x86-64 config.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Tested-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190702163844.20458-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
The bitbang i2c implementation is also useful for other device models
such as DDC in display controllers. Move the header to include/hw/i2c/
to allow it to be used from other device models and adjust users of
this include. This also reverts commit 2b4c1125ac which is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Message-id: 5d1fe4db846ab9be4b77ddb0d43cc74cd200a003.1561028123.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Rewrite to make it closer to how real device works so that guest OS
drivers can access I2C devices. Previously this was only a hack to
allow U-Boot to get past accessing SPD EEPROMs but to support other
I2C devices and allow guests to access them we need to model real
device more properly.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
As well as being able to generate its own i2c transactions, the ppc4xx
i2c controller has a DIRECTCNTL register which allows explicit control
of the i2c lines.
Using this register an OS can directly bitbang i2c operations. In
order to let emulated i2c devices respond to this, we need to wire up
the DIRECTCNTL register to qemu's bitbanged i2c handling code.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
We don't emulate slave mode so related registers are not needed.
[lh]sadr are only retained to avoid too many warnings and simplify
debugging but sdata is not even correct because device has a 4 byte
FIFO instead so just remove this unimplemented register for now.
The intr register is also not implemented correctly, it is for
diagnostics and normally not even visible on device without explicitly
enabling it. As no guests are known to need this remove it as well.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Make it more readable by converting register indexes to decimal
(avoids lot of superfluous 0x0) and distinguish errors caused by
accessing non-existent vs. unimplemented registers.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This cleanup makes the number of objects depending on qapi/error.h
drop from 1910 (out of 4743) to 1612 in my "build everything" tree.
While there, separate #include from file comment with a blank line,
and drop a useless comment on why qemu/osdep.h is included first.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180201111846.21846-5-armbru@redhat.com>
[Semantic conflict with commit 34e304e975 resolved, OSX breakage fixed]
Enough to please U-Boot and make it able to detect SDRAM SPD EEPROMs
Signed-off-by: François Revol <revol@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Peter Maydell
BALATON Zoltan
Markus Armbruster