All remaining conversions to qdev_realize() are for bus-less devices.
Coccinelle script:
// only correct for bus-less @dev!
@@
expression errp;
expression dev;
@@
- qdev_init_nofail(dev);
+ qdev_realize(dev, NULL, &error_fatal);
@ depends on !(file in "hw/core/qdev.c") && !(file in "hw/core/bus.c")@
expression errp;
expression dev;
symbol true;
@@
- object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(dev), true, "realized", errp);
+ qdev_realize(DEVICE(dev), NULL, errp);
@ depends on !(file in "hw/core/qdev.c") && !(file in "hw/core/bus.c")@
expression errp;
expression dev;
symbol true;
@@
- object_property_set_bool(dev, true, "realized", errp);
+ qdev_realize(DEVICE(dev), NULL, errp);
Note that Coccinelle chokes on ARMSSE typedef vs. macro in
hw/arm/armsse.c. Worked around by temporarily renaming the macro for
the spatch run.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200610053247.1583243-57-armbru@redhat.com>
This is the same transformation as in the previous commit, except
sysbus_init_child_obj() and realize are too separated for the commit's
Coccinelle script to handle, typically because sysbus_init_child_obj()
is in a device's instance_init() method, and the matching realize is
in its realize() method.
Perhaps a Coccinelle wizard could make it transform that pattern, but
I'm just a bungler, and the best I can do is transforming the two
separate parts separately:
@@
expression errp;
expression child;
symbol true;
@@
- object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(child), true, "realized", errp);
+ sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(child), errp);
// only correct with a matching sysbus_init_child_obj() transformation!
@@
expression errp;
expression child;
symbol true;
@@
- object_property_set_bool(child, true, "realized", errp);
+ sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(child), errp);
// only correct with a matching sysbus_init_child_obj() transformation!
@@
expression child;
@@
- qdev_init_nofail(DEVICE(child));
+ sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(child), &error_fatal);
// only correct with a matching sysbus_init_child_obj() transformation!
@@
expression child;
expression dev;
@@
dev = DEVICE(child);
...
- qdev_init_nofail(dev);
+ sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);
// only correct with a matching sysbus_init_child_obj() transformation!
@@
expression child;
identifier dev;
@@
DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(child);
...
- qdev_init_nofail(dev);
+ sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);
// only correct with a matching sysbus_init_child_obj() transformation!
@@
expression parent, name, size, type;
expression child;
symbol true;
@@
- sysbus_init_child_obj(parent, name, child, size, type);
+ sysbus_init_child_XXX(parent, name, child, size, type);
@@
expression parent, propname, type;
expression child;
@@
- sysbus_init_child_XXX(parent, propname, child, sizeof(*child), type)
+ object_initialize_child(parent, propname, child, type)
@@
expression parent, propname, type;
expression child;
@@
- sysbus_init_child_XXX(parent, propname, &child, sizeof(child), type)
+ object_initialize_child(parent, propname, &child, type)
This script is *unsound*: we need to manually verify init and realize
conversions are properly paired.
This commit has only the pairs where object_initialize_child()'s
@child and sysbus_realize()'s @dev argument text match exactly within
the same source file.
Note that Coccinelle chokes on ARMSSE typedef vs. macro in
hw/arm/armsse.c. Worked around by temporarily renaming the macro for
the spatch run.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200610053247.1583243-49-armbru@redhat.com>
stm32f405_soc_initfn() creates six such devices, but
stm32f405_soc_realize() realizes only one. Affects machine
netduinoplus2.
In theory, a device becomes real only on realize. In practice, the
transition from unreal to real is a fuzzy one. The work to make a
device real can be spread between realize methods (fine),
instance_init methods (wrong), and board code wiring up the device
(fine as long as it effectively happens on realize). Depending on
what exactly is done where, a device can work even when we neglect
to realize it.
The five unrealized devices appear to stay unreal: neither MMIO nor
IRQ get wired up.
Fix stm32f405_soc_realize() to realize and wire up all six. Visible
in "info qtree":
bus: main-system-bus
type System
dev: stm32f405-soc, id ""
cpu-type = "cortex-m4-arm-cpu"
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012000/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012100/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012200/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012300/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio 0000000040012000/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012400/00000000000000ff
dev: stm32f2xx-adc, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
- mmio ffffffffffffffff/00000000000000ff
+ mmio 0000000040012500/00000000000000ff
dev: armv7m, id ""
Fixes: 529fc5fd3e
Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20200609122339.937862-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Avoid orphan memory regions being added in the /unattached QOM
container.
This commit was produced with the Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/memory-region-housekeeping.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
This commit was produced with the Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/memory-region-housekeeping.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
The scripts/coccinelle/memory-region-housekeeping.cocci reported:
* TODO [[view:./hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c::face=ovl-face1::linb=96::colb=4::cole=26][potential use of memory_region_init_rom*() in ./hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c::96]]
* TODO [[view:./hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c::face=ovl-face1::linb=98::colb=4::cole=26][potential use of memory_region_init_rom*() in ./hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c::98]]
We can indeed replace the memory_region_init_ram() and
memory_region_set_readonly() calls by memory_region_init_rom().
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Markus Armbruster
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Marc-André Lureau
Alistair Francis