M680x0 doesn't support the same set of instructions
as ColdFire, so we can't use "any" CPU type to execute
m68020 instructions.
We select CPU type ("m68040" or "any" for ColdFire)
according to the ELF header. If we can't, we
use by default the value used until now: "any".
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20180220173307.25125-4-laurent@vivier.eu>
Instead of a sequence of "#if ... #endif" move the
selection to a function in linux-user/*/target_elf.h
We can't add them in linux-user/*/target_cpu.h
because we will need to include "elf.h" to
use ELF flags with eflags, and including
"elf.h" in "target_cpu.h" introduces some
conflicts in elfload.c
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20180220173307.25125-2-laurent@vivier.eu>
With glibc 2.27 the openpty function prefers the TIOCGPTPEER ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <mvmbmhdosb9.fsf_-_@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
TARGET_NR_select can have three different implementations:
1- to always return -ENOSYS
microblaze, ppc, ppc64
-> TARGET_WANT_NI_OLD_SELECT
2- to take parameters from a structure pointed by arg1
(kernel sys_old_select)
i386, arm, m68k
-> TARGET_WANT_OLD_SYS_SELECT
3- to take parameters from arg[1-5]
(kernel sys_select)
x86_64, alpha, s390x,
cris, sparc, sparc64
Some (new) architectures don't define NR_select,
4- but only NR__newselect with sys_select:
mips, mips64, sh
5- don't define NR__newselect, and use pselect6 syscall:
aarch64, openrisc, tilegx, unicore32
Reported-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Reported-by: Allan Wirth <awirth@akamai.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
These headers all use TARGET_STRUCTS_H as header guard symbol. Reuse
of the same guard symbol in multiple headers is okay as long as they
cannot be included together.
Since we can avoid guard symbol reuse easily, do so: use guard symbol
$target_TARGET_STRUCTS_H for linux-user/$target/target_structs.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
These headers all use TARGET_SIGNAL_H as header guard symbol. Reuse
of the same guard symbol in multiple headers is okay as long as they
cannot be included together.
Since we can avoid guard symbol reuse easily, do so: use guard symbol
$target_TARGET_SIGNAL_H for linux-user/$target/target_signal.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
These headers all use TARGET_CPU_H as header guard symbol. Reuse of
the same guard symbol in multiple headers is okay as long as they
cannot be included together.
Since we can avoid guard symbol reuse easily, do so: use guard symbol
$target_TARGET_CPU_H for linux-user/$target/target_cpu.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Some of them use guard symbol TARGET_SYSCALL_H, but we also have
CRIS_SYSCALL_H, MICROBLAZE_SYSCALLS_H, TILEGX_SYSCALLS_H and
__UC32_SYSCALL_H__. They all upset scripts/clean-header-guards.pl.
Reuse of the same guard symbol TARGET_SYSCALL_H in multiple headers is
okay as long as they cannot be included together. The script can't
tell, so it warns.
The script dislikes the other guard symbols, too. They don't match
their file name (they should, to make guard collisions less likely),
and __UC32_SYSCALL_H__ is a reserved identifier.
Clean them all up: use guard symbol $target_TARGET_SYSCALL_H for
linux-user/$target/target_sycall.h.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Update the M68K main loop and sigreturn code:
* on TARGET_ERESTARTSYS, wind guest PC backwards to repeat syscall insn
* set all guest CPU state within signal.c code on sigreturn
* handle TARGET_QEMU_ESIGRETURN in the main loop as the indication
that the main loop should not touch any guest CPU state
Signed-off-by: Timothy Edward Baldwin <T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk>
Message-id: 1441497448-32489-32-git-send-email-T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: tweak commit message; drop TARGET_USE_ERESTARTSYS define]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
x86, m68k, ppc, sh4 and sparc failed to enable timerfd, because they
didn't have timerfd_create system call defined. Instead QEMU
defined timerfd syscall. Checking with kernel sources, it appears
kernel developers reused timerfd syscall number with timerfd_create,
presumably since no userspace called the old syscall number.
Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
This fixes double-definitions in linux-user builds when using the UST
tracing backend (which indirectly includes the system's "syscall.h").
Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova <vilanova@ac.upc.edu>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The argument to the mlockall system call is not necessarily the same on
all platforms and thus may require translation prior to passing to the
host.
For example, PowerPC 64 bit platforms define values for MCL_CURRENT
(0x2000) and MCL_FUTURE (0x4000) which are different from Intel platforms
(0x1 and 0x2, respectively)
Signed-off-by: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The ELF V2 ABI for PPC64 defines MINSIGSTKSZ as 4096 bytes whereas it was
2048 previously.
Signed-off-by: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Popular glibc based distributions[1] require minimum
2.6.32 as kernel version. For some targets 2.6.18
would be enough, but dropping so low would mean some
suboptimal system calls could get used.
Set the minimum kernel advertized to 2.6.32 for
all architectures but aarch64 to ensure working qemu
linux-user in case host kernel is older.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/921078
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Creating target_structs header in linux-user/$arch/ and making
target_ipc_perm and target_shmid_ds its first inhabitants.
The struct defintions may/should be further fine-tuned by arch maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
For m68k, per-thread data is a purely kernel construct with no
CPU level support. Implement it via a field in the TaskState structure,
used by cpu_set_tls() and the set_thread_area/get_thread_area
syscalls. This allows us to enable compilation with NPTL.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
The functions cpu_clone_regs() and cpu_set_tls() are not purely CPU
related -- they are specific to the TLS ABI for a a particular OS.
Move them into the linux-user/ tree where they belong.
target-lm32 had entirely unused implementations, since it has no
linux-user target; just drop them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Add syscall numbers for new syscall numbers; this brings us
into line with Linux 2.6.39.2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list.
The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something
like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input
and cope with it.
This reverts commit 99a0949b72.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
