Make address_space_rw take transaction attributes, rather
than always using the 'unspecified' attributes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Memory allocated with GLib needs to be freed with GLib. Freeing it
with free() instead of g_free() is a common error. Harmless when
g_free() is a trivial wrapper around free(), which is commonly the
case. But model the difference anyway.
In a local scan, this flags four ALLOC_FREE_MISMATCH. Requires
--enable ALLOC_FREE_MISMATCH, because the checker is still preview.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Without a model, Coverity can't know that the result of g_strdup()
needs to be fed to g_free().
One way to get such a model is to scan GLib, build a derived model
file with cov-collect-models, and use that when scanning QEMU.
Unfortunately, the Coverity Scan service we use doesn't support that.
Thus, we're stuck with the other way: write a user model. Doing that
for all of GLib is hardly practical. I'm doing it for the "String
Utility Functions" we actually use that return dynamically allocated
strings.
In a local scan, this flags 20 additional RESOURCE_LEAKs. The ones I
checked look genuine.
It also loses a NULL_RETURNS about ppce500_init() using
qemu_find_file() without error checking. I don't understand why.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In current versions of GLib, g_new() may expand into g_malloc_n().
When it does, Coverity can't see the memory allocation, because we
don't model g_malloc_n(). Similarly for g_new0(), g_renew(),
g_try_new(), g_try_new0(), g_try_renew().
Model g_malloc_n(), g_malloc0_n(), g_realloc_n(). Model
g_try_malloc_n(), g_try_malloc0_n(), g_try_realloc_n() by adding
indeterminate out of memory conditions on top.
To avoid undue duplication, replace the existing models for g_malloc()
& friends by trivial wrappers around g_malloc_n() & friends.
In a local scan, this flags four additional RESOURCE_LEAKs and one
NULL_RETURNS.
The NULL_RETURNS is a false positive: Coverity can now see that
g_try_malloc(l1_sz * sizeof(uint64_t)) in
qcow2_check_metadata_overlap() may return NULL, but is too stupid to
recognize that a loop executing l1_sz times won't be entered then.
Three out of the four RESOURCE_LEAKs appear genuine. The false
positive is in ppce500_prep_device_tree(): the pointer dies, but a
pointer to a struct member escapes, and we get the pointer back for
freeing with container_of(). Too funky for Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This is the model file that is being used for the QEMU project's scans
on scan.coverity.com. It fixed about 30 false positives (10% of the
total) and exposed about 60 new memory leaks.
The file is not automatically used; changes to it must be propagated
to the website manually by an admin (right now Markus, Peter and me
are admins).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Peter Maydell
Jan Kiszka
Markus Armbruster
Paolo Bonzini