All of the functions that currently take a BlockDriverState, BdrvChild
or BlockBackend as their first parameter expect the associated
AioContext to be locked when they are called. In the case of
no_co_wrappers, they are called from bottom halves directly in the main
loop, so no other caller can be expected to take the lock for them. This
can result in assertion failures because a lock that isn't taken is
released in nested event loops.
Looking at the first parameter is already done by co_wrappers to decide
where the coroutine should run, so doing the same in no_co_wrappers is
only consistent. Take the lock in the generated bottom halves to fix the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230525124713.401149-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Some functions must not be called from coroutine context. The common
pattern to use them anyway from a coroutine is running them in a BH and
letting the calling coroutine yield to be woken up when the BH is
completed.
Instead of manually writing such wrappers, add support for generating
them to block-coroutine-wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Just omit the various 'return' when the return type is void.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have two inclusion loops:
block/block.h
-> block/block-global-state.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
block/block.h
-> block/block-io.h
-> block/block-common.h
-> block/blockjob.h
-> block/block.h
I believe these go back to Emanuele's reorganization of the block API,
merged a few months ago in commit d7e2fe4aac.
Fortunately, breaking them is merely a matter of deleting unnecessary
includes from headers, and adding them back in places where they are
now missing.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221221133551.3967339-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Add co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock and co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock option to
the block-coroutine-wrapper.py script.
This "_bdrv_rdlock" option takes and releases the graph rdlock when a
coroutine function is created.
This means that when used together with "_mixed", the function marked
with co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock will support both coroutine and
non-coroutine case, and in the latter case it will create a coroutine
that takes and releases the rdlock. When called from a coroutine, the
caller must already hold the graph lock.
Example:
void co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock bdrv_f1();
Becomes
static void bdrv_co_enter_f1()
{
bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
bdrv_co_function();
bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock();
}
void bdrv_f1()
{
if (qemu_in_coroutine) {
assume_graph_lock();
bdrv_co_function();
} else {
qemu_co_enter(bdrv_co_enter_f1);
...
}
}
When used alone, the function will not work in coroutine context, and
when called in non-coroutine context it will create a new coroutine that
takes care of taking and releasing the rdlock automatically.
Example:
void co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock bdrv_f1();
Becomes
static void bdrv_co_enter_f1()
{
bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
bdrv_co_function();
bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock();
}
void bdrv_f1()
{
assert(!qemu_in_coroutine());
qemu_co_enter(bdrv_co_enter_f1);
...
}
About their usage:
- co_wrapper does not take the rdlock, so it can be used also outside
the block layer.
- co_wrapper_mixed will be used by many blk_* functions, since the
coroutine function needs to call blk_wait_while_drained() and
the rdlock *must* be taken afterwards, otherwise it's a deadlock.
In the future this annotation will go away, and blk_* will use
co_wrapper directly.
- co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock will be used by BlockDriver callbacks, ideally
by all of them in the future.
- co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock will be used by the remaining functions
that are still called by coroutine and non-coroutine context. In the
future this annotation will go away, as we will split such mixed
functions.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221207131838.239125-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Extend the regex to cover also return type, pointers included.
This implies that the value returned by the function cannot be
a simple "int" anymore, but the custom return type.
Therefore remove poll_state->ret and instead use a per-function
custom "ret" field.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-13-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Right now, we take the first parameter of the function to get the
BlockDriverState to pass to bdrv_poll_co(), that internally calls
functions that figure in which aiocontext the coroutine should run.
However, it is useless to pass a bs just to get its own AioContext,
so instead pass it directly, and default to the main loop if no
BlockDriverState is passed as parameter.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-12-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This new annotation starts just a function wrapper that creates
a new coroutine. It assumes the caller is not a coroutine.
It will be the default annotation to be used in the future.
This is much better as c_w_mixed, because it is clear if the caller
is a coroutine or not, and provides the advantage of automating
the code creation. In the future all c_w_mixed functions will be
substituted by co_wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-11-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
In preparation to the incoming new function specifiers,
rename g_c_w with a more meaningful name and document it.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-10-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20211006131718.214235-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We are going to reuse the script to generate a nbd_ function in
further commit. Prepare the script now.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210610100802.5888-28-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We have a very frequent pattern of creating a coroutine from a function
with several arguments:
- create a structure to pack parameters
- create _entry function to call original function taking parameters
from struct
- do different magic to handle completion: set ret to NOT_DONE or
EINPROGRESS or use separate bool field
- fill the struct and create coroutine from _entry function with this
struct as a parameter
- do coroutine enter and BDRV_POLL_WHILE loop
Let's reduce code duplication by generating coroutine wrappers.
This patch adds scripts/block-coroutine-wrapper.py together with some
friends, which will generate functions with declared prototypes marked
by the 'generated_co_wrapper' specifier.
The usage of new code generation is as follows:
1. define the coroutine function somewhere
int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_NAME(...) {...}
2. declare in some header file
int generated_co_wrapper bdrv_NAME(...);
with same list of parameters (generated_co_wrapper is
defined in "include/block/block.h").
3. Make sure the block_gen_c declaration in block/meson.build
mentions the file with your marker function.
Still, no function is now marked, this work is for the following
commit.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200924185414.28642-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
[Added encoding='utf-8' to open() calls as requested by Vladimir. Fixed
typo and grammar issues pointed out by Eric Blake. Removed clang-format
dependency that caused build test issues.
--Stefan]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
