1. Add zero_pages field in MultiFDPacket_t.
2. Implements the zero page detection and handling on the multifd
threads for non-compression, zlib and zstd compression backends.
3. Added a new value 'multifd' in ZeroPageDetection enumeration.
4. Adds zero page counters and updates multifd send/receive tracing
format to track the newly added counters.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240311180015.3359271-5-hao.xiang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
For the incoming mapped-ram migration we need to read the ramblock
headers, get the pages bitmap and send the host address of each
non-zero page to the multifd channel thread for writing.
Usage on HMP is:
(qemu) migrate_set_capability multifd on
(qemu) migrate_set_capability mapped-ram on
(qemu) migrate_incoming file:migfile
(the ram.h include needs to move because we've been previously relying
on it being included from migration.c. Now file.h will start including
multifd.h before migration.o is processed)
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229153017.2221-22-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Allow multifd to open file-backed channels. This will be used when
enabling the mapped-ram migration stream format which expects a
seekable transport.
The QIOChannel read and write methods will use the preadv/pwritev
versions which don't update the file offset at each call so we can
reuse the fd without re-opening for every channel.
Contrary to the socket migration, the file migration doesn't need an
asynchronous channel creation process, so expose
multifd_channel_connect() and call it directly.
Note that this is just setup code and multifd cannot yet make use of
the file channels.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229153017.2221-18-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
We'll need to access multifd_send_state->channels_created from outside
multifd.c, so introduce a helper for that.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229153017.2221-17-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Currently multifd does not need to have knowledge of pages on the
receiving side because all the information needed is within the
packets that come in the stream.
We're about to add support to mapped-ram migration, which cannot use
packets because it expects the ramblock section in the migration file
to contain only the guest pages data.
Add a data structure to transfer pages between the ram migration code
and the multifd receiving threads.
We don't want to reuse MultiFDPages_t for two reasons:
a) multifd threads don't really need to know about the data they're
receiving.
b) the receiving side has to be stopped to load the pages, which means
we can experiment with larger granularities than page size when
transferring data.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229153017.2221-16-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Next patches will abstract the type of data being received by the
channels, so do some cleanup now to remove references to pages and
dependency on 'normal_num'.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229153017.2221-14-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Use a more specific name for the compression data so we can use the
generic for the multifd core code.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229153017.2221-13-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
With a clear definition of p->c protocol, where we only set it up if the
channel is fully established (TLS or non-TLS), registered_yank boolean will
have equal meaning of "p->c != NULL".
Drop registered_yank by checking p->c instead.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222095301.171137-3-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Hide the error handling inside multifd_send_setup to make it cleaner
for the next patch to move the function around.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206215118.6171-4-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
We currently only need p->running to avoid calling qemu_thread_join()
on a non existent thread if the thread has never been created.
However, there are at least two bugs in this logic:
1) On the sending side, p->running is set too early and
qemu_thread_create() can be skipped due to an error during TLS
handshake, leaving the flag set and leading to a crash when
multifd_send_cleanup() calls qemu_thread_join().
2) During exit, the multifd thread clears the flag while holding the
channel lock. The counterpart at multifd_send_cleanup() reads the flag
outside of the lock and might free the mutex while the multifd thread
still has it locked.
Fix the first issue by setting the flag right before creating the
thread. Rename it from p->running to p->thread_created to clarify its
usage.
Fix the second issue by not clearing the flag at the multifd thread
exit. We don't have any use for that.
Note that these bugs are straight-forward logic issues and not race
conditions. There is still a gap for races to affect this code due to
multifd_send_cleanup() being allowed to run concurrently with the
thread creation loop. This issue is solved in the next patches.
Cc: qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Fixes: 2964714015 ("migration/tls: add support for multifd tls-handshake")
Reported-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: chenyuhui5@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206215118.6171-3-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
We're currently leaking the resources of the TLS thread by not joining
it and also overwriting the p->thread pointer altogether.
Fixes: a1af605bd5 ("migration/multifd: fix hangup with TLS-Multifd due to blocking handshake")
Cc: qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206215118.6171-2-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
When reviewing my attempt to refactor send_prepare(), Fabiano suggested we
try out with dropping the mutex in multifd code [1].
I thought about that before but I never tried to change the code. Now
maybe it's time to give it a stab. This only optimizes the sender side.
The trick here is multifd has a clear provider/consumer model, that the
migration main thread publishes requests (either pending_job/pending_sync),
while the multifd sender threads are consumers. Here we don't have a lot
of complicated data sharing, and the jobs can logically be submitted
lockless.
Arm the code with atomic weapons. Two things worth mentioning:
- For multifd_send_pages(): we can use qatomic_load_acquire() when trying
to find a free channel, but that's expensive if we attach one ACQUIRE per
channel. Instead, keep the qatomic_read() on reading the pending_job
flag as we do already, meanwhile use one smp_mb_acquire() after the loop
to guarantee the memory ordering.
- For pending_sync: it doesn't have any extra data required since now
p->flags are never touched, it should be safe to not use memory barrier.
That's different from pending_job.
Provide rich comments for all the lockless operations to state how they are
paired. With that, we can remove the mutex.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o7d1jlu5.fsf@suse.de
Suggested-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-24-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
As reported correctly by Fabiano [1] (while per Fabiano, it sourced back to
Elena's initial report in Oct 2023), MultiFDSendParams.packet_num is buggy
to be assigned and stored. Consider two consequent operations of: (1)
queue a job into multifd send thread X, then (2) queue another sync request
to the same send thread X. Then the MultiFDSendParams.packet_num will be
assigned twice, and the first assignment can get lost already.
To avoid that, we move the packet_num assignment from p->packet_num into
where the thread will fill in the packet. Use atomic operations to protect
the field, making sure there's no race.
Note that atomic fetch_add() may not be good for scaling purposes, however
multifd should be fine as number of threads should normally not go beyond
16 threads. Let's leave that concern for later but fix the issue first.
There's also a trick on how to make it always work even on 32 bit hosts for
uint64_t packet number. Switching to uintptr_t as of now to simply the
case. It will cause packet number to overflow easier on 32 bit, but that
shouldn't be a major concern for now as 32 bit systems is not the major
audience for any performance concerns like what multifd wants to address.
We also need to move multifd_send_state definition upper, so that
multifd_send_fill_packet() can reference it.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o7d1jlu5.fsf@suse.de
Reported-by: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-23-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Most of the multifd code uses send/recv to represent the two sides, but
some rare cases use save/load.
Since send/recv is the majority, replacing the save/load use cases to use
send/recv globally. Now we reach a consensus on the naming.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-22-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
This patch redefines the interfacing of ->send_prepare(). It further
simplifies multifd_send_thread() especially on zero copy.
Now with the new interface, we require the hook to do all the work for
preparing the IOVs to send. After it's completed, the IOVs should be ready
to be dumped into the specific multifd QIOChannel later.
So now the API looks like:
p->pages -----------> send_prepare() -------------> IOVs
This also prepares for the case where the input can be extended to even not
any p->pages. But that's for later.
This patch will achieve similar goal of what Fabiano used to propose here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240126221943.26628-1-farosas@suse.de
However the send() interface may not be necessary. I'm boldly attaching a
"Co-developed-by" for Fabiano.
Co-developed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-14-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Introduce a helper multifd_send_prepare_header() to setup the header packet
for multifd sender.
It's fine to setup the IOV[0] _before_ send_prepare() because the packet
buffer is already ready, even if the content is to be filled in.
With this helper, we can already slightly clean up the zero copy path.
Note that I explicitly put it into multifd.h, because I want it inlined
directly into multifd*.c where necessary later.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-13-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
This field, no matter whether on src or dest, is only used for debugging
purpose.
They can even be removed already, unless it still more or less provide some
accounting on "how many packets are sent/recved for this thread". The
other more important one is called packet_num, which is embeded in the
multifd packet headers (MultiFDPacket_t).
So let's keep them for now, but make them much easier to understand, by
doing below:
- Rename both of them to packets_sent / packets_recved, the old
name (num_packets) are waaay too confusing when we already have
MultiFDPacket_t.packets_num.
- Avoid worrying on the "initial packet": we know we will send it, that's
good enough. The accounting won't matter a great deal to start with 0 or
with 1.
- Move them to where we send/recv the packets. They're:
- multifd_send_fill_packet() for senders.
- multifd_recv_unfill_packet() for receivers.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-10-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Multifd provide a threaded model for processing jobs. On sender side,
there can be two kinds of job: (1) a list of pages to send, or (2) a sync
request.
The sync request is a very special kind of job. It never contains a page
array, but only a multifd packet telling the dest side to synchronize with
sent pages.
Before this patch, both requests use the pending_job field, no matter what
the request is, it will boost pending_job, while multifd sender thread will
decrement it after it finishes one job.
However this should be racy, because SYNC is special in that it needs to
set p->flags with MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC, showing that this is a sync request.
Consider a sequence of operations where:
- migration thread enqueue a job to send some pages, pending_job++ (0->1)
- [...before the selected multifd sender thread wakes up...]
- migration thread enqueue another job to sync, pending_job++ (1->2),
setup p->flags=MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC
- multifd sender thread wakes up, found pending_job==2
- send the 1st packet with MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC and list of pages
- send the 2nd packet with flags==0 and no pages
This is not expected, because MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC should hopefully be done
after all the pages are received. Meanwhile, the 2nd packet will be
completely useless, which contains zero information.
I didn't verify above, but I think this issue is still benign in that at
least on the recv side we always receive pages before handling
MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC. However that's not always guaranteed and just tricky.
One other reason I want to separate it is using p->flags to communicate
between the two threads is also not clearly defined, it's very hard to read
and understand why accessing p->flags is always safe; see the current impl
of multifd_send_thread() where we tried to cache only p->flags. It doesn't
need to be that complicated.
This patch introduces pending_sync, a separate flag just to show that the
requester needs a sync. Alongside, we remove the tricky caching of
p->flags now because after this patch p->flags should only be used by
multifd sender thread now, which will be crystal clear. So it is always
thread safe to access p->flags.
With that, we can also safely convert the pending_job into a boolean,
because we don't support >1 pending jobs anyway.
Always use atomic ops to access both flags to make sure no cache effect.
When at it, drop the initial setting of "pending_job = 0" because it's
always allocated using g_new0().
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-7-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
This array is redundant when p->pages exists. Now we extended the life of
p->pages to the whole period where pending_job is set, it should be safe to
always use p->pages->offset[] rather than p->normal[]. Drop the array.
Alongside, the normal_num is also redundant, which is the same to
p->pages->num.
This doesn't apply to recv side, because there's no extra buffering on recv
side, so p->normal[] array is still needed.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-6-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Multifd send side has two fields to indicate error quits:
- MultiFDSendParams.quit
- &multifd_send_state->exiting
Merge them into the global one. The replacement is done by changing all
p->quit checks into the global var check. The global check doesn't need
any lock.
A few more things done on top of this altogether:
- multifd_send_terminate_threads()
Moving the xchg() of &multifd_send_state->exiting upper, so as to cover
the tracepoint, migrate_set_error() and migrate_set_state().
- multifd_send_sync_main()
In the 2nd loop, add one more check over the global var to make sure we
don't keep the looping if QEMU already decided to quit.
- multifd_tls_outgoing_handshake()
Use multifd_send_terminate_threads() to set the error state. That has
a benefit of updating MigrationState.error to that error too, so we can
persist that 1st error we hit in that specific channel.
- multifd_new_send_channel_async()
Take similar approach like above, drop the migrate_set_error() because
multifd_send_terminate_threads() already covers that. Unwrap the helper
multifd_new_send_channel_cleanup() along the way; not really needed.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202102857.110210-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
This was introduced by commit 34c55a94b1 ("migration: Create multipage
support") and never used.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142144.9680-2-farosas@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
This will be used in the next commits to add colo support to multifd.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <88135197411df1a71d7832962b39abf60faf0021.1683572883.git.lukasstraub2@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Currently running migration_incoming_state_destroy() without first running
multifd_load_cleanup() will cause a yank error:
qemu-system-x86_64: ../util/yank.c:107: yank_unregister_instance:
Assertion `QLIST_EMPTY(&entry->yankfns)' failed.
(core dumped)
The above error happens in the target host, when multifd is being used
for precopy, and then postcopy is triggered and the migration finishes.
This will crash the VM in the target host.
To avoid that, move multifd_load_cleanup() inside
migration_incoming_state_destroy(), so that the load cleanup becomes part
of the incoming state destroying process.
Running multifd_load_cleanup() twice can become an issue, though, but the
only scenario it could be ran twice is on process_incoming_migration_bh().
So removing this extra call is necessary.
On the other hand, this multifd_load_cleanup() call happens way before the
migration_incoming_state_destroy() and having this happening before
dirty_bitmap_mig_before_vm_start() and vm_start() may be a need.
So introduce a new function multifd_load_shutdown() that will mainly stop
all multifd threads and close their QIOChannels. Then use this function
instead of multifd_load_cleanup() to make sure nothing else is received
before dirty_bitmap_mig_before_vm_start().
Fixes: b5eea99ec2 ("migration: Add yank feature")
Reported-by: Li Xiaohui <xiaohli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Since it's introduction in commit f986c3d256 ("migration: Create multifd
migration threads"), multifd_load_cleanup() never returned any value
different than 0, neither set up any error on errp.
Even though, on process_incoming_migration_bh() an if clause uses it's
return value to decide on setting autostart = false, which will never
happen.
In order to simplify the codebase, change multifd_load_cleanup() signature
to 'void multifd_load_cleanup(void)', and for every usage remove error
handling or decision made based on return value != 0.
Fixes: b5eea99ec2 ("migration: Add yank feature")
Reported-by: Li Xiaohui <xiaohli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Current logic assumes that channel connections on the destination side are
always established in the same order as the source and the first one will
always be the main channel followed by the multifid or post-copy
preemption channel. This may not be always true, as even if a channel has a
connection established on the source side it can be in the pending state on
the destination side and a newer connection can be established first.
Basically causing out of order mapping of channels on the destination side.
Currently, all channels except post-copy preempt send a magic number, this
patch uses that magic number to decide the type of channel. This logic is
applicable only for precopy(multifd) live migration, as mentioned, the
post-copy preempt channel does not send any magic number. Also, tls live
migrations already does tls handshake before creating other channels, so
this issue is not possible with tls, hence this logic is avoided for tls
live migrations. This patch uses read peek to check the magic number of
channels so that current data/control stream management remains
un-effected.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: manish.mishra <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
We were recalculating it left and right. We plan to change that
values on next patches.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
We were calling qemu_target_page_size() left and right.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reorder the structures so we can know if the fields are:
- Read only
- Their own locking (i.e. sems)
- Protected by 'mutex'
- Only for the multifd channel
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220531104318.7494-2-quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
dgilbert: Typo fixes from Chen Zhang
Implement zero copy send on nocomp_send_write(), by making use of QIOChannel
writev + flags & flush interface.
Change multifd_send_sync_main() so flush_zero_copy() can be called
after each iteration in order to make sure all dirty pages are sent before
a new iteration is started. It will also flush at the beginning and at the
end of migration.
Also make it return -1 if flush_zero_copy() fails, in order to cancel
the migration process, and avoid resuming the guest in the target host
without receiving all current RAM.
This will work fine on RAM migration because the RAM pages are not usually freed,
and there is no problem on changing the pages content between writev_zero_copy() and
the actual sending of the buffer, because this change will dirty the page and
cause it to be re-sent on a next iteration anyway.
A lot of locked memory may be needed in order to use multifd migration
with zero-copy enabled, so disabling the feature should be necessary for
low-privileged users trying to perform multifd migrations.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220513062836.965425-9-leobras@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Even though multifd_send_sync_main() currently emits error_reports, it's
callers don't really check it before continuing.
Change multifd_send_sync_main() to return -1 on error and 0 on success.
Also change all it's callers to make use of this change and possibly fail
earlier.
(This change is important to next patch on multifd zero copy
implementation, to make it sure an error in zero-copy flush does not go
unnoticed.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220513062836.965425-7-leobras@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
This variable, along with its helpers, is used to detect whether multiple
channel will be supported for migration. In follow up patches, there'll be
other capability that requires multi-channels. Hence move it outside multifd
specific code and make it public. Meanwhile rename it from "multifd" to
"multi_channels" to show its real meaning.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220331150857.74406-5-peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
The hostname is cached N times, N equals to the multifd channels.
Drop that cache because after previous patch we've got s->hostname
being alive for the whole lifecycle of migration procedure.
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220331150857.74406-3-peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
Rename num_normal_pages to total_normal_pages (peter)
We are only sending normal pages through multifd channels.
Later on this series, we are going to also send zero pages.
We are going to detect if a page is zero or non zero in the multifd
channel thread, not on the main thread.
So we receive an array of pages page->offset[N]
And we will end with:
p->normal[N - zero_pages]
p->zero[zero_pages].
In this patch, we just copy all the pages in offset to normal.
for (i = 0; i < pages->num; i++) {
p->narmal[p->normal_num] = pages->offset[i];
p->normal_num++:
}
Later in the series this becomes:
for (i = 0; i < pages->num; i++) {
if (buffer_is_zero(page->offset[i])) {
p->zerol[p->zero_num] = pages->offset[i];
p->zero_num++:
} else {
p->narmal[p->normal_num] = pages->offset[i];
p->normal_num++:
}
}
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
Improving comment (dave)
Renaming num_normal_pages to total_normal_pages (peter)
We will need to split it later in zero_num (number of zero pages) and
normal_num (number of normal pages). This name is better.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: <quintela@redhat.com>, <dgilbert@redhat.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
CC: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:05:51 +0800 (5 weeks, 4 days, 17 hours ago)
multifd with unsupported protocol will cause a segment fault.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0000563b4a93faf8 in socket_connect (addr=0x0, errp=0x7f7f02675410) at ../util/qemu-sockets.c:1190
#1 0x0000563b4a797a03 in qio_channel_socket_connect_sync
(ioc=0x563b4d16e8c0, addr=0x0, errp=0x7f7f02675410) at
../io/channel-socket.c:145
#2 0x0000563b4a797abf in qio_channel_socket_connect_worker (task=0x563b4cd86c30, opaque=0x0) at ../io/channel-socket.c:168
#3 0x0000563b4a792631 in qio_task_thread_worker (opaque=0x563b4cd86c30) at ../io/task.c:124
#4 0x0000563b4a91da69 in qemu_thread_start (args=0x563b4c44bb80) at ../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:541
#5 0x00007f7fe9b5b3f9 in ?? ()
#6 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
It's enough to check migrate_multifd_is_allowed() in multifd cleanup() and
multifd setup() though there are so many other places using migrate_use_multifd().
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela
<quintela@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Leonardo Bras Soares
Passos <lsoaresp@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:58:57 +0200 (1 week, 15 hours, 17 minutes ago)
[[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 35AB0B289C5DB258 created at 2021-09-01T17:58:57+0200 using RSA]]
When introducing yank functionality in the migration code I forgot
to cover the multifd send side.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
Tested-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Since multifd creation is async with migration_channel_connect, we should
pass the hostname from MigrationState to MultiFDSendParams.
Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan Jin <jinyan12@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <1600139042-104593-4-git-send-email-zhengchuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
It will be used later.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
No comp value needs to be zero.
