The handling for the XFS_IOC_DIOINFO ioctl is currently quite excessive:
This is not a "real" feature like the other features that we provide with
the "--enable-xxx" and "--disable-xxx" switches for the configure script,
since this does not influence lots of code (it's only about one call to
xfsctl() in file-posix.c), so people don't gain much with the ability to
disable this with "--disable-xfsctl".
It's also unfortunate that the ioctl will be disabled on Linux in case
the user did not install the right xfsprogs-devel package before running
configure. Thus let's simplify this by providing the ioctl definition
on our own, so we can completely get rid of the header dependency and
thus the related code in the configure script.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211215125824.250091-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This introduces three different parts of a job designed to run
on a custom runner managed by Red Hat. The goals include:
a) propose a model for other organizations that want to onboard
their own runners, with their specific platforms, build
configuration and tests.
b) bring awareness to the differences between upstream QEMU and the
version available under CentOS Stream, which is "A preview of
upcoming Red Hat Enterprise Linux minor and major releases".
c) because of b), it should be easier to identify and reduce the gap
between Red Hat's downstream and upstream QEMU.
The components of this custom job are:
I) OS build environment setup code:
- additions to the existing "build-environment.yml" playbook
that can be used to set up CentOS/EL 8 systems.
- a CentOS Stream 8 specific "build-environment.yml" playbook
that adds to the generic one.
II) QEMU build configuration: a script that will produce binaries with
features as similar as possible to the ones built and packaged on
CentOS stream 8.
III) Scripts that define the minimum amount of testing that the
binaries built with the given configuration (point II) under the
given OS build environment (point I) should be subjected to.
IV) Job definition: GitLab CI jobs that will dispatch the build/test
jobs (see points #II and #III) to the machine specifically
configured according to #I.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211111160501.862396-2-crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211115142915.3797652-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To have the jobs dispatched to custom runners, gitlab-runner must
be installed, active as a service and properly configured. The
variables file and playbook introduced here should help with those
steps.
The playbook introduced here covers the Linux distributions and
has been primarily tested on OS/machines that the QEMU project
has available to act as runners, namely:
* Ubuntu 20.04 on aarch64
* Ubuntu 18.04 on s390x
But, it should work on all other Linux distributions. Earlier
versions were tested on FreeBSD too, so chances of success are
high.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210630012619.115262-4-crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210709143005.1554-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To run basic jobs on custom runners, the environment needs to be
properly set up. The most common requirement is having the right
packages installed.
The playbook introduced here covers the QEMU's project s390x and
aarch64 machines. At the time this is being proposed, those machines
have already had this playbook applied to them.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willianr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210630012619.115262-3-crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210709143005.1554-3-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
This includes both input parameters (project id and commit) in the
message so to make it easier to debug returned API calls.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210222193240.921250-4-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When an HTTP GET request fails, it's useful to go beyond the "not
successful" message, and show the code returned by the server.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210222193240.921250-3-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This simply splits out the code that does an HTTP GET so that it
can be used for other API requests.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210222193240.921250-2-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Similarly to commit 8cdb2cef3f, move the gprof/gcov test to GitLab.
The coverage-summary.sh script is not Travis-CI specific, make it
generic.
[thuth: Add gcovr and bsdmainutils which are required for the
coverage-summary.sh script to the ubuntu docker file,
and use 'check' as test target]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201108204535.2319870-10-philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210211045455.456371-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210211122750.22645-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
This allows us to do:
./scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status -w -b HEAD -p 2961854
to check out own pipeline status of a recently pushed branch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201117173635.29101-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
When called in wait mode, this script will also wait for the pipeline
to be get to a "running" state. Because many more status may be seen
until a pipeline gets to "running", and those need to be handle too.
Reference: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/pipelines.html#list-project-pipelines
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-8-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
For two very different error conditions.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-7-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
So that exits based on user requests are handled more gracefully.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-6-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Out of the main function.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-5-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When waiting for a pipeline to run and finish, it's better to give
early feedback, and then sleep and wait, than the other wait around.
Specially for the first iteration, it's frustrating to see nothing
while the script is sleeping.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-4-crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The script has its own timeout, which is about how long the script
will wait (when called with --wait) for the pipeline to complete, and
not necessarily for the pipeline to complete.
Hopefully this new wording will be clearer.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-3-crosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
With the utility function `get_local_staging_branch_commit()`, the
name of the branch is hard coded (including in the function name).
For extensibility reasons, let's make that configurable.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200904164258.240278-2-crosa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This script is intended to be used right after a push to a branch.
By default, it will look for the pipeline associated with the commit
that is the HEAD of the *local* staging branch. It can be used as a
one time check, or with the `--wait` option to wait until the pipeline
completes.
If the pipeline is successful, then a merge of the staging branch into
the master branch should be the next step.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200709024657.2500558-2-crosa@redhat.com>
[thuth: Added the changes suggested by Erik Skultety]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
