Since we already have bitmap_mutex to protect either the dirty bitmap or
the clear log bitmap, we don't need atomic operations to set/clear/test on
the clear log bitmap. Switching all ops from atomic to non-atomic
versions, meanwhile touch up the comments to show which lock is in charge.
Introduced non-atomic version of bitmap_test_and_clear_atomic(), mostly the
same as the atomic version but simplified a few places, e.g. dropped the
"old_bits" variable, and also the explicit memory barriers.
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
"exec/ramblock.h" requires "qemu/rcu.h" for the definition of
rcu_head, and "exec/ramlist.h" for the definition of RAMBlockNotifier.
Add them to avoid when when refactoring include/:
include/exec/ramblock.h:26:21: error: field has incomplete type 'struct rcu_head'
struct rcu_head rcu;
^
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220207082756.82600-6-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Resizing while migrating is dangerous and does not work as expected.
The whole migration code works with the usable_length of a ram block and
does not expect this value to change at random points in time.
In the case of postcopy, relying on used_length is racy as soon as the
guest is running. Also, when used_length changes we might leave the
uffd handler registered for some memory regions, reject valid pages
when migrating and fail when sending the recv bitmap to the source.
Resizing can be trigger *after* (but not during) a reset in
ACPI code by the guest
- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c:acpi_ram_update()
- hw/i386/acpi-build.c:acpi_ram_update()
Let's remember the original used_length in a separate variable and
use it in relevant postcopy code. Make sure to update it when we resize
during precopy, when synchronizing the RAM block sizes with the source.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210429112708.12291-9-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
We need some of the fields without having to poison everything else.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
