Since we already forbid other nbd-server commands when not
in the right state, it is unlikely that any caller was relying
on a second stop to behave as a silent no-op. Update iotest
223 to show the improved behavior.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190111194720.15671-3-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Testing success paths is important, but it's also nice to highlight
expected failure handling, to show that we don't crash, and so that
upcoming tests that change behavior can demonstrate the resulting
effects on error paths.
Add the following errors:
Attempting to export without a running server
Attempting to start a second server
Attempting to export a bad node name
Attempting to export a name that is already exported
Attempting to export an enabled bitmap
Attempting to remove an already removed export
Attempting to quit server a second time
All of these properly complain except for a second server-stop,
which will be fixed next.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190111194720.15671-2-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
It is interesting to know whether the shutdown cause was 'quit' or
'reset', especially when using "--no-reboot". In that case, a management
layer can now determine if the guest wanted a reboot or shutdown, and
can act accordingly.
Changes the output of the reason in the iotests from 'host-qmp' to
'host-qmp-quit'. This does not break compatibility because
the field was introduced in the same version.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Message-Id: <20181205110131.23049-4-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This makes it possible to determine what the exact reason was for
a RESET or a SHUTDOWN. A management layer might need the specific reason
of those events to determine which cleanups or other actions it needs to do.
This patch also updates the iotests to the new expected output that includes
the reason.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Message-Id: <20181205110131.23049-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Commit message tweaked]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Testing granularity at the same size as the cluster isn't quite
as fun as what happens when it is larger or smaller. This
enhancement also shows that qemu's nbd server can serve the
same disk over multiple exports simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Although this test is NOT a full test of image fleecing (as it
intentionally uses just a single block device directly exported
over NBD, rather than trying to set up a blockdev-backup job with
multiple BDS involved), it DOES prove that qemu as a server is
able to properly expose a dirty bitmap over NBD.
When coupled with image fleecing, it is then possible for a
third-party client to do an incremental backup by using
qemu-img map with the x-dirty-bitmap option to learn which parts
of the file are dirty (perhaps confusingly, they are the portions
mapped as "data":false - which is part of the reason this is
still in the x- experimental namespace), along with another
normal client (perhaps 'qemu-nbd -c' to expose the server over
/dev/nbd0 and then just use normal I/O on that block device) to
read the dirty sections.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20180702191458.28741-3-eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Eric Blake
Dominik Csapak