Instead of building the condition documentation from a list of string,
use the result generated from QAPISchemaIfCond.docgen().
This changes the generated documentation from:
- COND1, COND2... (where COND1, COND2 are Literal nodes, and ',' is Text)
to:
- COND1 and COND2 (the whole string as a Literal node)
This will allow us to generate more complex conditions in the following
patches, such as "(COND1 and COND2) or COND3".
Adding back the differentiated formatting is left to the wish list.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-6-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[TODO comment added]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Mechanical change, except for a new assertion in
QAPISchemaEntity.ifcond().
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210804083105.97531-3-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Rebased with obvious conflicts, commit message adjusted]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Rename QAPIError to QAPISourceError, and then create a new QAPIError
class that serves as the basis for all of our other custom exceptions,
without specifying any class properties.
This leaves QAPIError as a package-wide error class that's suitable for
any current or future errors.
(Right now, we don't have any errors that DON'T also want to specify a
Source location, but this MAY change. In these cases, a common abstract
ancestor would be desired.)
Add docstrings to explain the intended function of each error class.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210421192233.3542904-2-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
These sections need to be wrapped in a block-level element, such as
Paragraph in order for them to be rendered into Texinfo correctly.
Before (e.g.):
<section ids="qapidoc-713">
<title>If</title>
<literal>defined(CONFIG_REPLICATION)</literal>
</section>
became:
.SS If
\fBdefined(CONFIG_REPLICATION)\fP.SS \fBBlockdevOptionsReplication\fP (Object)
...
After:
<section ids="qapidoc-713">
<title>If</title>
<paragraph>
<literal>defined(CONFIG_REPLICATION)</literal>
</paragraph>
</section>
becomes:
.SS If
.sp
\fBdefined(CONFIG_REPLICATION)\fP
.SS \fBBlockdevOptionsReplication\fP (Object)
...
Reported-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210406141909.1992225-2-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In commit e2bbc4eaa7 we changed the QAPI modules to name the built-in
module "./builtin" rather than None, but forgot to update the Sphinx
plugin. The effect of this was that when the plugin generated a dependency
file it was including a bogus dependency on a non-existent file named
"builtin", which meant that ninja would run Sphinx and rebuild all
the documentation every time even if nothing had changed.
Update the plugin to use the new name of the builtin module.
Fixes: e2bbc4eaa7
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210212161311.28915-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This patch adds a new 'coroutine' flag to QMP command definitions that
tells the QMP dispatcher that the command handler is safe to be run in a
coroutine.
The documentation of the new flag pretends that this flag is already
used as intended, which it isn't yet after this patch. We'll implement
this in another patch in this series.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201005155855.256490-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Some of our documentation is auto-generated from documentation
comments in the JSON schema.
For Sphinx, rather than creating a file to include, the most natural
way to handle this is to have a small custom Sphinx extension which
processes the JSON file and inserts documentation into the rST
file being processed.
This is the same approach that kerneldoc and hxtool use.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200925162316.21205-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Comment and doc string formatting tweaked, unused method dropped,
a few line breaks tweaked to follow PEP 8 more closely, MAINTAINERS
section QAPI updated]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
