Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marc-André Lureau
7849f0c2ec slirp: is not maintained by Kelly Price for a long time
slirp has been maintained by the QEMU maintainers and will be
maintained under an independent project soon.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelly Price <strredwolf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
2019-03-22 17:31:42 +01:00
Marc-André Lureau
772c712731 slirp: update COPYRIGHT to use full 3-Clause BSD License
According to commit 2f5f899631 ("Remove
the advertising clause from the slirp license"), Danny Gasparovski
gave permission to license slirp code under 3-clause BSD license:

    Subject: RE: Slirp license
    Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:51:00 +1100
    From: "Gasparovski, Daniel" <Daniel.Gasparovski@ato.gov.au>
    To: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com>

    I have no objection to having Slirp code in QEMU be licensed under
    the 3-clause BSD license.

slirp/COPYRIGHT's initial version in 2004 (commit 5fafdf24) listed
only 3 clauses BUT used the poisonous advertising clause for clause 3
which is the controversial clause of non-free 4-clause (that is, it
appears that the BSD-4 license was copied, and then the WRONG clause
was deleted, when creating COPYRIGHT.  Perhaps explained as an easy
mistake to make since 3-clause was created by removing clause 3 of the
4-clause, where you sometimes see the three-clause version with
clauses 1, 2, 4; but more commonly see a renumbered version with
clauses 1, 2, 3 to close the gap. If you pay attention only to clause
numbers instead of content, it can be easy to confuse which clause to
delete to go from 4-clause to 3-clause).

Commit 2f5f89963 removed the poisonous wrong clause on
the grounds of moving from 4-clause to 3-clause; but did not add the
missing clause, which makes it LOOK like the 2-clause version.  But I
think we have a decent enough trail showing the intent for 3-clause.

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
2019-03-22 17:23:58 +01:00
aliguori
2f5f899631 Remove the advertising clause from the slirp license
According to the FSF, the 4-clause BSD license, which slirp is covered under,
is not compatible with the GPL or LGPL[1].

[1] http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses

There are three declared copyright holders in slirp that use the 4-clause
BSD license, the Regents of UC Berkley, Danny Gasparovski, and Kelly Price.
Below are the appropriate permissions to remove the advertise clause from slirp
from each party.

Special thanks go to Richard Fontana from Red Hat for contacting all of the
necessary authors to resolve this issue!

Regents of UC Berkley:
From ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change

July 22, 1999

To All Licensees, Distributors of Any Version of BSD:

As you know, certain of the Berkeley Software Distribution ("BSD") source
code files require that further distributions of products containing all or
portions of the software, acknowledge within their advertising materials
that such products contain software developed by UC Berkeley and its
contributors.

Specifically, the provision reads:

"     * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
      *    must display the following acknowledgement:
      *    This product includes software developed by the University of
      *    California, Berkeley and its contributors."

Effective immediately, licensees and distributors are no longer required to
include the acknowledgement within advertising materials.  Accordingly, the
foregoing paragraph of those BSD Unix files containing it is hereby deleted
in its entirety.

William Hoskins
Director, Office of Technology Licensing
University of California, Berkeley

Danny Gasparovski:

Subject: RE: Slirp license
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:51:00 +1100
From: "Gasparovski, Daniel" <Daniel.Gasparovski@ato.gov.au>
To: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com>

Hi Richard,

I have no objection to having Slirp code in QEMU be licensed under the
3-clause BSD license.

Thanks for taking the effort to consult me about this.


Dan ...

Kelly Price:

Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:38:56 -0500
From: "Kelly Price" <strredwolf@gmail.com>
To: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Slirp license

Thanks for contacting me, Richard.  I'm glad you were able to find
Dan, as I've been "keeping the light on" for Slirp.  I have no use for
it now, and I have little time for it (now holding onto Keenspot's
Comic Genesis and having a regular US state government position). If
Dan would like to return to the project, I'd love to give it back to
him.

As for copyright, I don't own all of it.  Dan does, so I will defer to
him.  Any of my patches I will gladly license to the 3-part BSD
license.  My interest in re-licensing was because we didn't have ready
info to contact Dan.  If Dan would like to port Slirp back out of
QEMU, a lot of us 64-bit users would be grateful.

Feel free to share this email address with Dan.  I will be glad to
effect a transfer of the project to him and Mr. Bellard of the QEMU
project.

Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>


git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6451 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
2009-01-26 19:37:41 +00:00
ths
5fafdf24ef find -type f | xargs sed -i 's/[\t ]$//g' # on most files
git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@3173 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
2007-09-16 21:08:06 +00:00
bellard
25b42e9d53 added missing copyright file
git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@846 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
2004-05-22 18:30:22 +00:00