This returns a fixed but non-zero value for the chip id.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200121013302.43839-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This splits the common write callback into separate ast2400 and ast2500
implementations. This makes it clearer when implementing differing
behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200121013302.43839-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The device tree blob returned by load_device_tree is malloced.
We should free it after cpu_physical_memory_write().
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200218091154.21696-3-kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
We already detect if a device is being hot plugged before CAS to trigger
a CAS reboot and during migration to migrate the state of the associated
DRC. But hot unplugging a device is also an asynchronous operation that
requires the guest to take action. This means that if the guest is migrated
after the hot unplug event was sent but before it could release the device
with RTAS, the destination QEMU doesn't know about the pending unplug
operation and doesn't actually remove the device when the guest finally
releases it.
Similarly, if the unplug request is fired before CAS, the guest isn't
notified of the change, just like with hotplug. It ends up booting with
the device still present in the DT and configures it, just like it was
never removed. Even weirder, since the event is still queued, it will
be eventually processed when some other unrelated event is posted to
the guest.
Enhance spapr_drc_transient() to also return true if an unplug request is
pending. This fixes the issue at CAS with a CAS reboot request and
causes the DRC state to be migrated. Some extra care is still needed to
inform the destination that an unplug request is pending : migrate the
unplug_requested field of the DRC in an optional subsection. This might
break backwards migration, but this is still better than ending with
an inconsistent guest.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <158169248798.3465937.1108351365840514270.stgit@bahia.lan>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
We currently don't support hotplug of devices between boot and CAS. If
this happens a CAS reboot is triggered. We detect this during CAS using
the spapr_drc_needed() function which is essentially a VMStateDescription
.needed callback. Even if the condition for CAS reboot happens to be the
same as for DRC migration, it looks wrong to piggyback a migration helper
for this.
Introduce a helper with slightly more explicit name and use it in both CAS
and DRC migration code. Since a subsequent patch will enhance this helper
to cover the case of hot unplug, let's go for spapr_drc_transient(). While
here convert spapr_hotplugged_dev_before_cas() to the "transient" wording as
well.
This doesn't change any behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <158169248180.3465937.9531405453362718771.stgit@bahia.lan>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
'fdt' forgot to clean both e500 and pnv when we call 'system_reset' on ppc,
this patch fix it. The leak stacks are as follow:
Direct leak of 4194304 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fafe37dd970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
#1 0x7fafe2e3149d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
#2 0x561876f7f80d in create_device_tree /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/device_tree.c:40
#3 0x561876b7ac29 in ppce500_load_device_tree /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/ppc/e500.c:364
#4 0x561876b7f437 in ppce500_reset_device_tree /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/ppc/e500.c:617
#5 0x56187718b1ae in qemu_devices_reset /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/core/reset.c:69
#6 0x561876f6938d in qemu_system_reset /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/vl.c:1412
#7 0x561876f6a25b in main_loop_should_exit /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/vl.c:1645
#8 0x561876f6a398 in main_loop /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/vl.c:1679
#9 0x561876f7da8e in main /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/vl.c:4438
#10 0x7fafde16b812 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
#11 0x5618765c055d in _start (/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/build/ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64+0x2b1555d)
Direct leak of 1048576 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fc0a6f1b970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
#1 0x7fc0a656f49d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
#2 0x55eb05acd2ca in pnv_dt_create /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/ppc/pnv.c:507
#3 0x55eb05ace5bf in pnv_reset /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/hw/ppc/pnv.c:578
#4 0x55eb05f2f395 in qemu_system_reset /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/vl.c:1410
#5 0x55eb05f43850 in main /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/vl.c:4403
#6 0x7fc0a18a9812 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
#7 0x55eb0558655d in _start (/mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu/build/ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64+0x2b1555d)
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200214033206.4395-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This allows moving the kernel in the guest memory. The option is useful
for step debugging (as Linux is linked at 0x0); it also allows loading
grub which is normally linked to run at 0x20000.
This uses the existing kernel address by default.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Message-Id: <20200203032943.121178-6-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
We obviously don't want to print out an error message if addr points to
a valid register.
Reported-by: Coverity CID 1419391 Missing break in switch
Fixes: 9ae1329ee2 "ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER8 PHB3 PCIe Host bridge"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <158153365202.3229002.11521084761048102466.stgit@bahia.lan>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Obviously, we want to pass &local_err so that we can check it then
line below, not errp.
Reported-by: Coverity CID 1419395 'Constant' variable guards dead code
Fixes: 4f9924c4d4 "ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER9 PHB4 PCIe Host bridge"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <158153364605.3229002.2796177658957390343.stgit@bahia.lan>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
As reported by Coverity defect CID 1419397, the 'j' variable goes up to
63 and shouldn't be used to left shift a 32-bit integer.
The result of the operation goes to a 64-bit integer : use a 64-bit
constant.
Reported-by: Coverity CID 1419397 Bad bit shift operation
Fixes: 9ae1329ee2 "ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER8 PHB3 PCIe Host bridge"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <158153364010.3229002.8004283672455615950.stgit@bahia.lan>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This patch implements few of the necessary hcalls for the nvdimm support.
PAPR semantics is such that each NVDIMM device is comprising of multiple
SCM(Storage Class Memory) blocks. The guest requests the hypervisor to
bind each of the SCM blocks of the NVDIMM device using hcalls. There can
be SCM block unbind requests in case of driver errors or unplug(not
supported now) use cases. The NVDIMM label read/writes are done through
hcalls.
Since each virtual NVDIMM device is divided into multiple SCM blocks,
the bind, unbind, and queries using hcalls on those blocks can come
independently. This doesn't fit well into the qemu device semantics,
where the map/unmap are done at the (whole)device/object level granularity.
The patch doesnt actually bind/unbind on hcalls but let it happen at the
device_add/del phase itself instead.
The guest kernel makes bind/unbind requests for the virtual NVDIMM device
at the region level granularity. Without interleaving, each virtual NVDIMM
device is presented as a separate guest physical address range. So, there
is no way a partial bind/unbind request can come for the vNVDIMM in a
hcall for a subset of SCM blocks of a virtual NVDIMM. Hence it is safe to
do bind/unbind everything during the device_add/del.
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <158131059899.2897.11515211602702956854.stgit@lep8c.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Add support for NVDIMM devices for sPAPR. Piggyback on existing nvdimm
device interface in QEMU to support virtual NVDIMM devices for Power.
Create the required DT entries for the device (some entries have
dummy values right now).
The patch creates the required DT node and sends a hotplug
interrupt to the guest. Guest is expected to undertake the normal
DR resource add path in response and start issuing PAPR SCM hcalls.
The device support is verified based on the machine version unlike x86.
This is how it can be used ..
Ex :
For coldplug, the device to be added in qemu command line as shown below
-object memory-backend-file,id=memnvdimm0,prealloc=yes,mem-path=/tmp/nvdimm0,share=yes,size=1073872896
-device nvdimm,label-size=128k,uuid=75a3cdd7-6a2f-4791-8d15-fe0a920e8e9e,memdev=memnvdimm0,id=nvdimm0,slot=0
For hotplug, the device to be added from monitor as below
object_add memory-backend-file,id=memnvdimm0,prealloc=yes,mem-path=/tmp/nvdimm0,share=yes,size=1073872896
device_add nvdimm,label-size=128k,uuid=75a3cdd7-6a2f-4791-8d15-fe0a920e8e9e,memdev=memnvdimm0,id=nvdimm0,slot=0
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
[Early implementation]
Message-Id: <158131058078.2897.12767731856697459923.stgit@lep8c.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
For ppc64, PAPR requires the nvdimm device to have UUID property
set in the device tree. Add an option to get it from the user.
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <158131056931.2897.14057087440721445976.stgit@lep8c.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
nvdimm_device_list is required for parsing the list for devices
in subsequent patches. Move it to common utility area.
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <158131055857.2897.15658377276504711773.stgit@lep8c.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
We are going to add more init for the latest machine, so move the setup
to a function so we don't have to change the DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE macro
each time.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207064628.1196095-1-mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
When PHB4 bridge has been added, the dependencies to PCIE_PORT has been
added to XIVE_SPAPR and indirectly to PSERIES.
The build of the PowerNV machine is fine while we also build the PSERIES
machine.
If we disable the PSERIES machine, the PowerNV build fails because the
PCI Express files are not built:
/usr/bin/ld: hw/ppc/pnv.o: in function `pnv_chip_power8_pic_print_info':
.../hw/ppc/pnv.c:623: undefined reference to `pnv_phb3_msi_pic_print_info'
/usr/bin/ld: hw/ppc/pnv.o: in function `pnv_chip_power9_pic_print_info':
.../hw/ppc/pnv.c:639: undefined reference to `pnv_phb4_pic_print_info'
/usr/bin/ld: ../hw/usb/hcd-ehci-pci.o: in function `usb_ehci_pci_write_config':
.../hw/usb/hcd-ehci-pci.c:129: undefined reference to `pci_default_write_config'
/usr/bin/ld: ../hw/usb/hcd-ehci-pci.o: in function `usb_ehci_pci_realize':
.../hw/usb/hcd-ehci-pci.c:68: undefined reference to `pci_allocate_irq'
/usr/bin/ld: .../hw/usb/hcd-ehci-pci.c:72: undefined reference to `pci_register_bar'
/usr/bin/ld: ../hw/usb/hcd-ehci-pci.o:(.data.rel+0x50): undefined reference to `vmstate_pci_device'
This patch fixes the problem by adding needed dependencies to POWERNV.
Fixes: 4f9924c4d4 ("ppc/pnv: Add models for POWER9 PHB4 PCIe Host bridge")
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200205232016.588202-3-lvivier@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The "ibm,os-term" RTAS call has a single parameter which is a pointer to
a message from the guest kernel about the termination cause; this prints
it.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Message-Id: <20200203032044.118585-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Inspired-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Use an explicit boolean type.
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
The address_space_rw() function allows either reads or writes
depending on the is_write argument passed to it; this is useful
when the direction of the access is determined programmatically
(as for instance when handling the KVM_EXIT_MMIO exit reason).
Under the hood it just calls either address_space_write() or
address_space_read_full().
We also use it a lot with a constant is_write argument, though,
which has two issues:
* when reading "address_space_rw(..., 1)" this is less
immediately clear to the reader as being a write than
"address_space_write(...)"
* calling address_space_rw() bypasses the optimization
in address_space_read() that fast-paths reads of a
fixed length
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20200218112457.22712-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMD: Update macvm_set_cr0() reported by Laurent Vivier]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Since its introduction in commit ac1970fbe8, address_space_rw()
takes a boolean 'is_write' argument. Fix the codebase by using
an explicit boolean type.
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Inspired-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Suggested-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Two lines in hw/net/dp8393x.c that Coccinelle produced that
were over 80 characters were re-wrapped by hand.
Suggested-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
The NetReceive prototype gets a const buffer:
typedef ssize_t (NetReceive)(NetClientState *, const uint8_t *, size_t);
We already have the address_space_write() method to write a const
buffer to an address space. Use it to avoid:
hw/net/i82596.c: In function ‘i82596_receive’:
hw/net/i82596.c:644:54: error: passing argument 4 of ‘address_space_rw’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Since its introduction in commit d86a77f8ab, dma_memory_read()
always accepted void pointer argument. Remove the unnecessary
casts.
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
v4: Drop parenthesis when removing cast (Eric Blake)
all boards were switched to using memdev backend for main RAM,
so we can drop no longer used memory_region_allocate_system_memory()
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-73-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-72-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Patch moves ram size check into sun4m_hw_init() and drops
ram_init() moving remainder to sun4m_hw_init() as well,
as it was the only place that called it.
Also it rewrites impl. of RamDevice a little bit, which
could serve as an example of frontend device for RAM backend.
(Caveats are:
1. it doesn't check for memdev backend being mapped
since it's been usurped by generic machine to handle
majority of machines which don't have RAM frontend device
2. it still lacks 'addr' property and still has hardcoded
sysbus_mmio_map() in board init. If done right, board should
set 'addr' property and bus/machine plug handler should map
it during device realize time.
)
Further improvements were left as exercise for the future,
since frontends are out scope of RAM conversion to memdev.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-71-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-70-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-69-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-68-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-67-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported or sometimes
crash like this:
%QEMU -M bamboo -m 1
exec.c:1926: find_ram_offset: Assertion `size != 0' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
That also fixes crash issue, since wrongly calculated size
isn't used to allocate RAM
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-66-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
in ref405ep alias RAM into ram_memories[] to avoid re-factoring
its user ppc405ep_init(), which would be invasive and out of
scope this patch.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-65-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will ignore it
and continue running with fixed RAM size.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it
won't be possible for board to fix CLI.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
PS:
move fixed RAM size into mc->default_ram_size, so that
generic code will know how much to allocate.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-64-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-63-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Acked-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-62-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Acked-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-61-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-60-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
While at it, replace usage of global ram_size with
machine->ram_size
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-59-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-58-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-57-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-56-imammedo@redhat.com>
error out in case user asked for more RAM than board
supports.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-55-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-54-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-53-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-52-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-51-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-50-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-49-imammedo@redhat.com>
Switch to using generic main RAM allocation. To do this set
MachineClass::default_ram_id to m68k_mac.ram and use
MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-48-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-47-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-46-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-45-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-44-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-43-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-42-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-41-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-40-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-39-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-38-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-37-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-36-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-35-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away,
so replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion.
The later is initialized by generic code, so board only
needs to opt in to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and then map memory region provided by
MachineState::ram_memdev
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-34-imammedo@redhat.com>
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-33-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-32-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-31-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-30-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed IMX6Sabrelite
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-29-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-28-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-27-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-26-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-25-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-24-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-23-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed MCIMX7Sabre
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-22-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed MCIMX6ULEVK
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-21-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Chubb <peter.chubb@data61.csiro.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-20-imammedo@redhat.com>
If the user provided too large a RAM size, the code used to
complain and trim it to the max size. Now that RAM is allocated by
generic code, that's no longer possible, so generate an error and
exit instead.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Chubb <peter.chubb@data61.csiro.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-19-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-18-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-17-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-16-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-15-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed DigicBoardState
PS2:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-14-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
While at it, get rid of no longer needed CubieBoardState wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-13-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
- while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-12-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-11-imammedo@redhat.com>
It's supposed that SOC will check if "-m" provided
RAM size is valid by setting "ram-size" property and
then board would read back valid (possibly corrected
value) to map RAM MemoryReging with valid size.
It isn't doing so, since check is called only
indirectly from
aspeed_sdmc_reset()->asc->compute_conf()
or much later when guest writes to configuration
register.
So depending on "-m" value QEMU end-ups with a warning
and an invalid MemoryRegion size allocated and mapped.
(examples:
-M ast2500-evb -m 1M
0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container
0000000080000000-00000000800fffff (prio 0, ram): ram
0000000080100000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram
-M ast2500-evb -m 3G
0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container
0000000080000000-000000013fffffff (prio 0, ram): ram
[DETECTED OVERFLOW!] 0000000140000000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram
)
On top of that sdmc falls back and reports to guest
"default" size, it thinks machine should have.
This patch makes ram-size check actually work and
changes behavior from a warning later on during
machine reset to error_fatal at the moment SOC.ram-size
is set so user will have to fix RAM size on CLI
to start machine.
It also gets out of the way mutable ram-size logic,
so we could consolidate RAM allocation logic around
pre-allocated hostmem backend (supplied by user or
auto created by generic machine code depending on
supplied -m/mem-path/mem-prealloc options.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-10-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-9-imammedo@redhat.com>
In case of NUMA there are 2 cases to consider:
1. '-numa node,memdev', the only one that will be available
for 5.0 and newer machine types.
In this case reuse current behavior, with only difference
memdevs are put into MachineState::ram container +
a temporary glue to keep memory_region_allocate_system_memory()
working until all boards converted.
2. fake NUMA ("-numa node mem" and default RAM splitting)
the later has been deprecated and will be removed but the former
is going to stay available for compat reasons for 5.0 and
older machine types
it takes allocate_system_memory_nonnuma() path, like non-NUMA
case and falls under conversion to memdev. So extend non-NUMA
MachineState::ram initialization introduced in previous patch
to take care of fake NUMA case.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-6-imammedo@redhat.com>
the new field will be used by boards to get access to main
RAM memory region and will help to save boiler plate in
boards which often introduce a field or variable just for
this purpose.
Memory region will be equivalent to what currently used
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() is returning apart
from that it will come from hostmem backend.
Followup patches will incrementally switch boards to using
RAM from MachineState::ram.
Patch takes care of non-NUMA case and follow up patch will
initialize MachineState::ram for NUMA case.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-5-imammedo@redhat.com>
Property will contain link to memory backend that will be
used for backing initial RAM.
Follow up commit will alias -mem-path and -mem-prealloc
CLI options into memory backend options to make memory
handling consistent (using only hostmem backend family
for guest RAM allocation).
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-3-imammedo@redhat.com>
it has been deprecated since 4.0 by commit
cb79224b7 (deprecate -mem-path fallback to anonymous RAM)
Deprecation period ran out and it's time to remove it
so it won't get in a way of switching to using hostmem
backend for RAM.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-2-imammedo@redhat.com>
The device tree blob returned by load_device_tree is malloced.
We should free it after cpu_physical_memory_write().
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20200218091154.21696-4-kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
The device tree blob returned by load_device_tree is malloced.
We should free it after cpu_physical_memory_write().
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20200218091154.21696-2-kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Joel Stanley
Chen Qun
Greg Kurz
Pan Nengyuan
Alexey Kardashevskiy
Shivaprasad G Bhat
Michael S. Tsirkin
Laurent Vivier
Peter Maydell
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Igor Mammedov