Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Markus Armbruster
d2623129a7 qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends
The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with
the same name already exists.  Since our property names are all
hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to
handle it is passing &error_abort.

Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which
additionally fails when the child already has a parent.  Parentage is
also under program control, so this is a programming error, too.

We have a bit over 500 callers.  Almost half of them pass
&error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles
errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers.

The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring
programming errors is a bad idea.

Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API.
The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a
pointer to a variable containing NULL.  Passing an argument of the
latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the
first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second
call.  ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(),
sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize()
are wrong that way.

When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting
users pick the argument is a bad idea.

Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead.

There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming
error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and
undocumented) "automatic arrayification".  Don't drop @errp there.
Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(),
and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add().

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com>
[Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-05-15 07:07:58 +02:00
Like Xu
5cc8767d05 general: Replace global smp variables with smp machine properties
Basically, the context could get the MachineState reference via call
chains or unrecommended qdev_get_machine() in !CONFIG_USER_ONLY mode.

A local variable of the same name would be introduced in the declaration
phase out of less effort OR replace it on the spot if it's only used
once in the context. No semantic changes.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20190518205428.90532-4-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2019-07-05 17:07:36 -03:00
Markus Armbruster
0b8fa32f55 Include qemu/module.h where needed, drop it from qemu-common.h
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523143508.25387-4-armbru@redhat.com>
[Rebased with conflicts resolved automatically, except for
hw/usb/dev-hub.c hw/misc/exynos4210_rng.c hw/misc/bcm2835_rng.c
hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c hw/display/virtio-vga.c hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c;
ui/cocoa.m fixed up]
2019-06-12 13:18:33 +02:00
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
e9808d0969 hw: use "qemu/osdep.h" as first #include in source files
applied using ./scripts/clean-includes

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
2017-12-18 17:07:02 +03:00
Laurent Vivier
be2960baae cpu: don't allow negative core id
With pseries machine type a negative core-id is not managed properly:
-1 gives an inaccurate error message ("core -1 already populated"),
-2 crashes QEMU (core dump)

As it seems a negative value is invalid for any architecture,
instead of checking this in spapr_core_pre_plug() I think it's better
to check this in the generic part, core_prop_set_core_id()

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170802103259.25940-1-lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2017-08-02 18:30:13 -03:00
Thomas Huth
ba31cc7226 Introduce DEVICE_CATEGORY_CPU for CPU devices
Now that CPUs show up in the help text of "-device ?",
we should group them into an appropriate category.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1484917276-7107-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-01-27 18:07:31 +01:00
Bharata B Rao
f1020c2c26 cpu: Abstract CPU core type
Add an abstract CPU core type that could be used by machines that want
to define and hotplug CPUs in core granularity.

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
               [Integer core property]
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
[dwg: changed property names to 'core-id' and 'nr-threads']
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
2016-06-17 16:33:48 +10:00